There is alignment support for AddressAllocator but there are occations
that the alignment is known only when we call allocate(). One example
is PCI BAR which is natually aligned, means for which we have to align
the base address to its size.
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
This is only for allocating the port IO address range.
If a platform does not have PIO devices at all, the address
range will simply be unused.
So, simplify the vm-allocator data structure by making both
MMIO and PIO mandatory.
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
The IO memory alignment should be set as byte alignment instead of 0x400
which is copied from crosvm.
Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@linux.intel.com>
We can only free ranges that exactly map an already allocated one, i.e.
this is not a range resizing.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Add the BSD and Apache license.
Make all crosvm references point to the BSD license.
Add the right copyrights and identifier to our VMM code.
Add Intel copyright to the vm-virtio and pci crates.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This is based on the crosvm resource allocator from commit 107edb3e.
We only have PIO and MMIO address space to handle, and don't have a GPU
specific path and space.
Also, we support allocating a range at a specified address. This is
mostly useful for PIO, but might be also necessary for MMIO.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
