This patch introduces the first implementation of the virtio-iommu
device. This device emulates an IOMMU for the guest, which allows
special use cases like nesting passed through devices, or even using
IOVAs from the guest.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
In case some virtio devices are attached to the virtual IOMMU, their
vring addresses need to be translated from IOVA into GPA. Otherwise it
makes no sense to try to access them, and they would cause out of range
errors.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Adding virtio feature VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when explicitly asked by
the user. The need for this feature is to be able to attach the virtio
device to a virtual IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Adding virtio feature VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when explicitly asked by
the user. The need for this feature is to be able to attach the virtio
device to a virtual IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Adding virtio feature VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when explicitly asked by
the user. The need for this feature is to be able to attach the virtio
device to a virtual IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Adding virtio feature VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when explicitly asked by
the user. The need for this feature is to be able to attach the virtio
device to a virtual IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Adding virtio feature VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when explicitly asked by
the user. The need for this feature is to be able to attach the virtio
device to a virtual IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Adding virtio feature VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when explicitly asked by
the user. The need for this feature is to be able to attach the virtio
device to a virtual IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The virtio specification defines a device can be reset, which was not
supported by this vhost-user-fs implementation. The reason it is needed
is to support unbinding this device from the guest driver, and rebind it
to vfio-pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The virtio specification defines a device can be reset, which was not
supported by this vhost-user-net implementation. The reason it is needed
is to support unbinding this device from the guest driver, and rebind it
to vfio-pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The virtio specification defines a device can be reset, which was not
supported by this virtio-console implementation. The reason it is needed
is to support unbinding this device from the guest driver, and rebind it
to vfio-pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The virtio specification defines a device can be reset, which was not
supported by this virtio-vsock implementation. The reason it is needed
is to support unbinding this device from the guest driver, and rebind
it to vfio-pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The virtio specification defines a device can be reset, which was not
supported by this virtio-pmem implementation. The reason it is needed
is to support unbinding this device from the guest driver, and rebind
it to vfio-pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The virtio specification defines a device can be reset, which was not
supported by this virtio-rng implementation. The reason it is needed
is to support unbinding this device from the guest driver, and rebind
it to vfio-pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The virtio specification defines a device can be reset, which was not
supported by this virtio-net implementation. The reason it is needed is
to support unbinding this device from the guest driver, and rebind it to
vfio-pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
While implement vhost-user-net backend with Tap interface, it keeps
failed to enable the tx vring, since there is a checking in
slave_req_handler.rs to require acked_protocol_features to be setup
as a pre-requirement, which is filled by set_protocol_features call.
Add this call in vhost-user-net device implementation to address the issue.
Signed-off-by: Cathy Zhang <cathy.zhang@intel.com>
The purpose of this new crate is to provide a common library to all
vhost-user backend implementations. The more is handled by this library,
the less duplication will need to happen in each vhost-user daemon.
This crate relies a lot on vhost_rs, vm-memory and vm-virtio crates.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The vhost-user implementation was always passing the maximum size
supported by the virtqueues to the backend, but this is obviously wrong
as it must pass the size being set by the driver running in the guest.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The 32 or 64 bits type for the memory BAR was not set correctly. This
patch ensure the right type is applied to the BAR.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
If we expect the vhost-user-blk device to be used for booting a VMM
along with the firmware, then need the device to support being reset.
In the vhost-user context, this means the backend needs to be informed
the vrings are disabled and stopped, and the owner needs to be reset
too.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
In vhost-user-blk, only WCE value can be set back to device in
guest kernel like
echo "write through" > /sys/block/vda/cache_type
So write_config() will only set WCE value from guest kernel to
vhost user side.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Since config space in vhost-user-blk are mostly from backend
device, this change will get config space info from backend
by vhost-user protocol.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
vhost-user-blk has better performance than virtio-blk, so we need
add vhost-user-blk support with SPDK in Rust-based VMMs.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Now that virtio-bindings is a crate part of the rust-vmm project, we
want to rely on this one instead of the local one we had so far.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Currently all devices and guest memory share the same 64GiB
allocation. With guest memory working upwards and devices working
downwards. This creates issues if you want to either have a VM with a
large amount of memory or want to have devices with a large allocation
(e.g. virtio-pmem.)
As it is possible for the hypervisor to place devices anywhere in its
address range it is required for simplistic users like the firmware to
set up an identity page table mapping across the full range. Currently
the hypervisor sets up an identify mapping of 1GiB which the firmware
extends to 64GiB to match the current address space size of the
hypervisor.
A simpler solution is to place the device needed for booting with the
firmware (virtio-block) inside the 32-bit memory hole. This allows the
firmware to easily access the block device and paves the way for
increasing the address space beyond the current 64GiB limit.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Derived from the crosvm code at 5656c124af2bb956dba19e409a269ca588c685e3
and adapted to work within cloud-hypervisor:
Main differences:
* Interrupt handling is done via a VirtioInterrupt turned into a
devices::Interrupt
* GuestMemory -> GuestMemoryMmap
* Differences in read/write for BusDevice
* Different crates for EventFd and GuestAddress
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
This unit testing porting effort is based off of Firecracker commit
1e1cb6f8f8003e0bdce11d265f0feb23249a03f6
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
This is the last step connecting the dots between the virtio-vsock
device and the bulk of the logic hosted in the unix and csm modules.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
This commit relies on the new vsock::unix module to create the backend
that will be used from the virtio-vsock device.
The concept of backend is interesting here as it would allow for a vhost
kernel backend to be plugged if that was needed someday.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
This code porting is based off of Firecracker commit
1e1cb6f8f8003e0bdce11d265f0feb23249a03f6
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
This code porting is based off of Firecracker commit
1e1cb6f8f8003e0bdce11d265f0feb23249a03f6
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
There is a lot of code related to this virtio-vsock hybrid
implementation, that's why it's better to keep it under its
own module.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
This is the first commit introducing the support for virtio-vsock.
This is based off of Firecracker commit
1e1cb6f8f8003e0bdce11d265f0feb23249a03f6
Fixes#102
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Regarding vhost-user-net, there are features in avail_features
and acked_features, like VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC which is required by
driver and device to transfer mac address through config space,
but not needed by backend, like ovs+dpdk, so it's necessary to
adjust backend_features based on acked_features before calling
set_features() API.
This fix is to record backend_features in vhost-user-net to avoid
requesting it twice.
Signed-off-by: Cathy Zhang <cathy.zhang@intel.com>
New event is added in VhostUserEpollHandler for vhost-user fs,
but the total event count is not update accordingly. Fix the
issue and refactor the event data setting for new event
expansion in the future.
Signed-off-by: Cathy Zhang <cathy.zhang@intel.com>
At this point in the code, the acked features have been provided by the
guest and they can be set back to the backend. There's no need to
retrieve one more time the backend features for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
As mentioned in the vhost-user specification, each ring is initialized
in a stopped state. This means each ring should be enabled only after
it has been correctly initialized.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The available features are masked with the backend features, therefore
the available features should be the one used when calling into
set_features() API.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
In order to factorize the code between vhost-user-net and virtio-fs one
step further, this patch extends the vhost-user handler implementation
to support slave requests.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
This patch factorizes the existing virtio-fs code by relying onto the
common code part of the vhost_user module in the vm-virtio crate.
In details, it factorizes the vhost-user setup, and reuses the error
types defined by the module instead of defining its own types.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
vhost-user-net introduced a new module vhost_user inside the vm-virtio
crate. Because virtio-fs is actually vhost-user-fs, it belongs to this
new module and needs to be moved there.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
vhost-user framwork could provide good performance in data intensive
scenario due to the memory sharing mechanism. Implement vhost-user-net
device to get the benefit for Rust-based VMMs network.
Signed-off-by: Cathy Zhang <cathy.zhang@intel.com>
By making the registration functions immutable, this patch prevents from
self borrowing issues with the RwLock on self.mem.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Following the refactoring of the code allowing multiple threads to
access the same instance of the guest memory, this patch goes one step
further by adding RwLock to it. This anticipates the future need for
being able to modify the content of the guest memory at runtime.
The reasons for adding regions to an existing guest memory could be:
- Add virtio-pmem and virtio-fs regions after the guest memory was
created.
- Support future hotplug of devices, memory, or anything that would
require more memory at runtime.
Because most of the time, the lock will be taken as read only, using
RwLock instead of Mutex is the right approach.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The VMM guest memory was cloned (copied) everywhere the code needed to
have ownership of it. In order to clean the code, and in anticipation
for future support of modifying this guest memory instance at runtime,
it is important that every part of the code share the same instance.
Because VirtioDevice implementations need to have access to it from
different threads, that's why Arc must be used in this case.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
