It is permissable for the driver to program fewer queues than offered by
the device. Filter the queues so that only the ready ones are included
and check that they have valid addresses configured.
Fixes: #2136
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Rather than having to give and return the ioeventfd used for a device
clone them each time. This will make it simpler when we start handling
the driver enabling fewer queues than advertised by the device.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Sometimes when running under the CI tests fail due to a barrier not
being released and the guest blocks on an MMIO write. Add further
debugging to try and identify the issue.
See: #2118
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
On the CI we are seeing issues with the activation barriers not being released:
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452434193s: INFO:vmm/src/vm.rs:413 -- Waiting for barrier
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452499794s: INFO:virtio-devices/src/block.rs:382 -- Changing cache mode to writeback
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452605195s: INFO:vmm/src/vm.rs:413 -- Waiting for barrier
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452684596s: INFO:virtio-devices/src/transport/pci_device.rs:671 -- Waiting for barrier
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452708196s: INFO:virtio-devices/src/transport/pci_device.rs:673 -- Barrier released
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452717596s: INFO:vmm/src/vm.rs:415 -- Barrier released
Add some debugging to try and identify the vause of this issue.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
When a device is ready to be activated signal to the VMM thread via an
EventFd that there is a device to be activated. When the VMM receives a
notification on the EventFd that there is a device to be activated
notify the device manager to attempt to activate any devices that have
not been activated.
As a side effect the VMM thread will create the virtio device threads.
Fixes: #1863
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
We need to be able to return the barrier from the code that prepares to
activate the virtio device. This triggered by a write to the
configuration fields stored in the PCI BAR. Since bars can be accessed
by both memory mapping and through PCI config I/O several prototypes
must be changed.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
This can be uses to indicate to the caller that it should wait on the
barrier before returning as there is some asynchronous activity
triggered by the write which requires the KVM exit to block until it's
completed.
This is useful for having vCPU thread wait for the VMM thread to proceed
to activate the virtio devices.
See #1863
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
When a total ordering between multiple atomic variables is not required
then use Ordering::Acquire with atomic loads and Ordering::Release with
atomic stores.
This will improve performance as this does not require a memory fence
on x86_64 which Ordering::SeqCst will use.
Add a comment to the code in the vCPU handling code where it operates on
multiple atomics to explain why Ordering::SeqCst is required.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
This removes the dependency of the pci crate on the devices crate which
now only contains the device implementations themselves.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
There will be some cases where the implementation of the snapshot()
function from the Snapshottable trait will require to modify some
internal data, therefore we make this possible by updating the trait
definition with snapshot(&mut self).
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
In this commit we saved the BDF of a PCI device and set it to "devid"
in GSI routing entry, because this field is mandatory for GICv3-ITS.
Signed-off-by: Michael Zhao <michael.zhao@arm.com>
Split the generic virtio code (queues and device type) from the
VirtioDevice trait, transport and device implementations.
This also simplifies the feature handling in vhost_user_backend as the
vm-virtio crate is no longer has any features.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
