error: field assignment outside of initializer for an instance created with Default::default()
--> virtio-devices/src/mem.rs:496:9
|
496 | resp.resp_type = resp_type;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: consider initializing the variable with `mem::VirtioMemResp { resp_type: resp_type, ..Default::default() }` and removing relevant reassignments
--> virtio-devices/src/mem.rs:495:9
|
495 | let mut resp = VirtioMemResp::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#field_reassign_with_default
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
We must explicitly mark these values as u8 as the function that consumes
them takes a T and needs to use the specific width.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
error: field assignment outside of initializer for an instance created with Default::default()
--> hypervisor/src/kvm/mod.rs:318:9
|
318 | cap.cap = KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D clippy::field-reassign-with-default` implied by `-D warnings`
note: consider initializing the variable with `kvm_bindings::kvm_enable_cap { cap: KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP, ..Default::default() }` and removing relevant reassignments
--> hypervisor/src/kvm/mod.rs:317:9
|
317 | let mut cap: kvm_enable_cap = Default::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#field_reassign_with_default
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
error: this returns a `Result<_, ()>
--> net_util/src/mac.rs:68:5
|
68 | pub fn from_bytes(src: &[u8]) -> Result<MacAddr, ()> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D clippy::result-unit-err` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: use a custom Error type instead
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#result_unit_err
Replace with std::io::Error like other locations in the same file.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
With Rust 1.49 using attributes on a function parameter is not allowed.
The recommended workaround is to put it in a new block.
error[E0658]: attributes on expressions are experimental
--> vmm/src/memory_manager.rs:698:17
|
698 | #[cfg(target_arch = "x86_64")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #15701 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701> for more information
error: removing an expression is not supported in this position
--> vmm/src/memory_manager.rs:698:17
|
698 | #[cfg(target_arch = "x86_64")]
|
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
The boot time for direct kernel boot based tests is significantly
quicker than booting via the firmware and stock kernel as it triggers a
reboot during the boot process due to the initrd handling.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
When doing a direct kernel boot only have console=ttyS0 in the command
line if we are explicitly testing the serial output. The default
behaviour is `--serial null` so this output will not be visible but will
trigger a KVM exit for every byte which is very costly when running
under nested virtualization.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
On the CI we are seeing issues with the activation barriers not being released:
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452434193s: INFO:vmm/src/vm.rs:413 -- Waiting for barrier
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452499794s: INFO:virtio-devices/src/block.rs:382 -- Changing cache mode to writeback
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452605195s: INFO:vmm/src/vm.rs:413 -- Waiting for barrier
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452684596s: INFO:virtio-devices/src/transport/pci_device.rs:671 -- Waiting for barrier
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452708196s: INFO:virtio-devices/src/transport/pci_device.rs:673 -- Barrier released
cloud-hypervisor: 12.452717596s: INFO:vmm/src/vm.rs:415 -- Barrier released
Add some debugging to try and identify the vause of this issue.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Now that we can support supplying an fd to the TAP device we can support
the MACVTAP and MACVLAN use cases.
Fixes: #872
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Add an "fd=" parameter to allow specifying a TAP fd to use. Currently
only one fd for one queue pair is supported.
Fixes: #2052
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Add support for creating virtio-net device from existing TAP fd.
Currently only a single fd and thus no-more than 2 queues (one pair) is
suppored.
Fixes: #2052
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Ultimately this will allow the creation of a virtio-net device that is
backed by a file descriptor.
This function ensures that the TAP device is correctly setup with
offloading and non-blocking.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
And fix related warnings: op_kind and op_register are being deprecated
as they might panic.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Starting the virtio device threads from the VMM thread has slowed down
the start of the VM when running on a highly contested system like the
CI.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
When a device is ready to be activated signal to the VMM thread via an
EventFd that there is a device to be activated. When the VMM receives a
notification on the EventFd that there is a device to be activated
notify the device manager to attempt to activate any devices that have
not been activated.
As a side effect the VMM thread will create the virtio device threads.
Fixes: #1863
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
We need to be able to return the barrier from the code that prepares to
activate the virtio device. This triggered by a write to the
configuration fields stored in the PCI BAR. Since bars can be accessed
by both memory mapping and through PCI config I/O several prototypes
must be changed.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
This can be uses to indicate to the caller that it should wait on the
barrier before returning as there is some asynchronous activity
triggered by the write which requires the KVM exit to block until it's
completed.
This is useful for having vCPU thread wait for the VMM thread to proceed
to activate the virtio devices.
See #1863
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
Currently these two macros(msr, msr_data) reside both on kvm and mshv
module. Definition is same for both module. Moving them to arch/x86
module eliminates redundancy and makes more sense.
Signed-off-by: Muminul Islam <muislam@microsoft.com>
On the CI we are seeing that sometimes the epoll is receiving these
errors which do not indicate a failure but that we should retry.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
