libvirt/src/util/virkeycode.c

127 lines
3.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2011 Lai Jiangshan
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library. If not, see
* <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
*/
#include <config.h>
#include "virkeycode.h"
#include <string.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#define VIRT_KEY_INTERNAL
#include "virkeymaps.h"
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
static const char **virKeymapNames[] = {
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_LINUX] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
virKeymapNames_linux,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_XT] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
NULL,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_ATSET1] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
NULL,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_ATSET2] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
NULL,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_ATSET3] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
NULL,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_OSX] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
virKeymapNames_os_x,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_XT_KBD] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
NULL,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_USB] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
NULL,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_WIN32] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
virKeymapNames_win32,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_RFB] =
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
NULL,
};
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
verify(ARRAY_CARDINALITY(virKeymapNames) == VIR_KEYCODE_SET_LAST);
static unsigned short *virKeymapValues[] = {
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_LINUX] =
virKeymapValues_linux,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_XT] =
virKeymapValues_xt,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_ATSET1] =
virKeymapValues_atset1,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_ATSET2] =
virKeymapValues_atset2,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_ATSET3] =
virKeymapValues_atset3,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_OSX] =
virKeymapValues_os_x,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_XT_KBD] =
virKeymapValues_xt_kbd,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_USB] =
virKeymapValues_usb,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_WIN32] =
virKeymapValues_win32,
[VIR_KEYCODE_SET_RFB] =
virKeymapValues_rfb,
};
verify(ARRAY_CARDINALITY(virKeymapValues) == VIR_KEYCODE_SET_LAST);
VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virKeycodeSet, VIR_KEYCODE_SET_LAST,
"linux",
"xt",
"atset1",
"atset2",
"atset3",
"os_x",
"xt_kbd",
"usb",
"win32",
"rfb",
);
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
int virKeycodeValueFromString(virKeycodeSet codeset,
const char *keyname)
{
int i;
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < VIR_KEYMAP_ENTRY_MAX; i++) {
if (!virKeymapNames[codeset] ||
!virKeymapValues[codeset])
continue;
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
const char *name = virKeymapNames[codeset][i];
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
if (name && STREQ_NULLABLE(name, keyname))
return virKeymapValues[codeset][i];
}
return -1;
}
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
int virKeycodeValueTranslate(virKeycodeSet from_codeset,
virKeycodeSet to_codeset,
int key_value)
{
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
int i;
if (key_value <= 0)
return -1;
Rewrite keycode map to avoid a struct Playing games with field offsets in a struct causes all sorts of alignment warnings on ARM platforms util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueFromString': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:91:28: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' const char *name = getfield(virKeycodes + i, const char *, name_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:94:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, code_offset); ^ util/virkeycode.c: In function '__virKeycodeValueTranslate': util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:127:13: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' if (getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, from_offset) == key_value) ^ util/virkeycode.c:26:7: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align] (*(typeof(field_type) *)((char *)(object) + field_offset)) ^ util/virkeycode.c:128:20: note: in expansion of macro 'getfield' return getfield(virKeycodes + i, unsigned short, to_offset); There is no compelling reason to use a struct for the keycode tables. It can easily just use an array of arrays instead, avoiding all alignment problems Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2013-04-03 12:51:56 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < VIR_KEYMAP_ENTRY_MAX; i++) {
if (virKeymapValues[from_codeset][i] == key_value)
return virKeymapValues[to_codeset][i];
}
return -1;
}