External/libvirt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt.git synced 2024-12-26 23:55:23 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
3c2b3a6f31
libvirt/tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/qemuxml2xmlout-pcie-expander-bus.xml

376 lines
16 KiB
XML
Raw Normal View History

conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
<domain type='qemu'>
<name>pcie-expander-bus-test</name>
<uuid>11dbdcdd-4c3b-482b-8903-9bdb8c0a2774</uuid>
<memory unit='KiB'>2097152</memory>
<currentMemory unit='KiB'>2097152</currentMemory>
<vcpu placement='static'>16</vcpu>
<os>
<type arch='x86_64' machine='q35'>hvm</type>
<boot dev='hd'/>
</os>
<cpu>
<topology sockets='2' cores='4' threads='2'/>
<numa>
<cell id='0' cpus='0-7' memory='109550' unit='KiB'/>
<cell id='1' cpus='8-15' memory='109550' unit='KiB'/>
</numa>
</cpu>
<clock offset='utc'/>
<on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff>
<on_reboot>restart</on_reboot>
<on_crash>destroy</on_crash>
<devices>
<emulator>/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm</emulator>
<disk type='block' device='disk'>
<source dev='/dev/HostVG/QEMUGuest1'/>
<target dev='sda' bus='sata'/>
<address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/>
</disk>
<controller type='pci' index='0' model='pcie-root'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<controller type='pci' index='1' model='pcie-expander-bus'>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
<model name='pxb-pcie'/>
<target busNr='254'>
<node>0</node>
</target>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/>
</controller>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<controller type='pci' index='2' model='pcie-root-port'>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
<model name='ioh3420'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='2' port='0x0' busNr='220'>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
<node>1</node>
</target>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<controller type='pci' index='3' model='pcie-switch-upstream-port'>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
<model name='x3130-upstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x02' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='4' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
<target chassis='4' port='0x0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='5' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
<target chassis='5' port='0x1'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x01' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='6' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='6' port='0x2'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='7' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='7' port='0x3'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='8' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='8' port='0x4'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='9' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='9' port='0x5'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x05' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='10' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='10' port='0x6'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x06' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='11' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='11' port='0x7'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x07' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='12' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='12' port='0x8'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x08' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='13' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='13' port='0x9'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x09' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='14' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='14' port='0xa'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x0a' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='15' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='15' port='0xb'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x0b' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='16' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='16' port='0xc'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x0c' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='17' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='17' port='0xd'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x0d' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='18' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='18' port='0xe'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x0e' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='19' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='19' port='0xf'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x0f' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='20' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='20' port='0x10'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x10' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='21' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='21' port='0x11'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x11' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='22' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='22' port='0x12'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x12' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='23' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='23' port='0x13'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x13' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='24' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='24' port='0x14'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x14' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='25' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='25' port='0x15'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x15' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='26' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='26' port='0x16'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x16' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='27' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='27' port='0x17'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x17' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='28' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='28' port='0x18'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x18' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='29' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='29' port='0x19'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x19' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='30' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='30' port='0x1a'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x1a' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='31' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='31' port='0x1b'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x1b' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='32' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='32' port='0x1c'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x1c' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='33' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='33' port='0x1d'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x1d' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='34' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='34' port='0x1e'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x1e' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='pci' index='35' model='pcie-switch-downstream-port'>
<model name='xio3130-downstream'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<target chassis='35' port='0x1f'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x1f' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</controller>
<controller type='sata' index='0'>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1f' function='0x2'/>
</controller>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:f1:95:51'/>
<model type='rtl8139'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x04' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:5c:c6:1a'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x05' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:39:97:ac'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x06' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:ee:b9:a8'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x07' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:a9:f7:17'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x08' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:df:2b:f3'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x09' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:78:94:b4'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x0a' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:6b:9b:06'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x0b' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:17:df:bc'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x0c' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:3b:d0:51'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x0d' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:8d:2d:17'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x0e' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:a7:66:af'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x0f' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:54:ab:d7'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x10' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:1f:99:90'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x11' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:c8:43:87'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x12' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:df:22:b2'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x13' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:d2:9a:47'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x14' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:86:05:e2'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x15' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:8c:1c:c2'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x16' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:48:58:92'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x17' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:99:e5:bf'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x18' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:b1:8c:25'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x19' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:60:e0:d0'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x1a' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:37:00:6a'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x1b' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:c7:c8:ad'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x1c' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:4e:a7:cf'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x1d' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:00:79:69'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x1e' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:47:00:6f'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x1f' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:2a:8c:8b'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x20' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:ec:d5:e3'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x21' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:7e:6e:c8'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x22' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:7e:6d:c9'/>
<model type='e1000'/>
tests: Reduce usage of legacy PCI controllers on PCIe machines Up until a while ago, libvirt would automatically add a legacy PCI controllers combo (dmi-to-pci-bridge + pci-bridge) to any PCIe machine type (x86_64/q35 and aarch64/virt). As a result, a number of input and output files in the test suite ended up containing the legacy PCI controllers, even though they are not needed or in any way relevant to the feature being tested. Get rid of most of the occurrences. Most of the time, this just means removing the controllers from the input file and regenerating the output files; in a few instances, some minor tweaking is performed on the input file, most notably removing the memory balloon: as memory balloon support was not the scope of the test being changed, there is no loss of test coverage from doing so. Several occurrences of the legacy PCI controllers remain in the test suite, both because removing their usage would have required even more tweaking, and because we still want to have coverage of this perfectly valid combination.
2017-02-21 13:30:39 +00:00
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x23' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
conf: new pci controller model pcie-expander-bus This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
2016-03-16 17:37:14 +00:00
</interface>
<input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/>
<input type='keyboard' bus='ps2'/>
<memballoon model='none'/>
</devices>
</domain>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink