2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
QEMU event handlers
|
|
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
This is a short description of how an example qemu event can be used
|
|
|
|
to trigger handler code that is called from the context of a worker
|
|
|
|
thread, rather than directly from the event thread (which should
|
|
|
|
itself never block, and can't do things like send qemu monitor
|
|
|
|
commands, etc).
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
In this case (the ``NIC_RX_FILTER_CHANGED`` event) the event is handled by
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
calling a qemu monitor command to get the current RX filter state,
|
|
|
|
then executing ioctls/sending netlink messages on the host in response
|
|
|
|
to changes in that filter state. This event is *not* propagated to the
|
|
|
|
libvirt API (but if someone wants to add details of how to handle that
|
|
|
|
to the end of this document, please do!).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully this narration will be helpful when adding handlers for
|
|
|
|
other qemu events in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
QEMU monitor events
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any event emitted by qemu is received by
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
``qemu_monitor_json.c:qemuMonitorJSONIOProcessEvent()``. It looks up the
|
|
|
|
event by name in the table ``eventHandlers`` (in the same file), which
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
should have an entry like this for each event that libvirt
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
understands::
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{ "NIC_RX_FILTER_CHANGED", qemuMonitorJSONHandleNicRxFilterChanged, },
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
NB: This table is searched with bsearch, so it *must* be alphabetically sorted.
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
``qemuMonitorJSONIOProcessEvent`` calls the function listed in
|
|
|
|
``eventHandlers``, e.g.::
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qemu_monitor_json.c:qemuMonitorJSONHandleNicRxFilterChanged()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which extracts any required data from the JSON ("name" in this case),
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
and calls::
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qemu_monitor.c:qemuMonitorEmitNicRxFilterChanged()
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
which uses ``QEMU_MONITOR_CALLBACK()`` to call
|
|
|
|
``mon->cb->domainNicRxFilterChanged()``. ``domainNicRxFilterChanged`` is one
|
|
|
|
in a list of function pointers in ``qemu_process.c:monitorCallbacks``. For
|
|
|
|
our example, it has been set to::
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qemuProcessHandleNicRxFilterChanged()
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
This function allocates a ``qemuProcessEvent`` object, and queues an event
|
|
|
|
named ``QEMU_PROCESS_EVENT_NIC_RX_FILTER_CHANGED`` (you'll want to add an
|
|
|
|
enum to ``qemu_domain.h:qemuProcessEventType`` for your event) for a
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
worker thread to handle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Everything up to this point has happened in the context of the thread
|
|
|
|
that is reading events from qemu, so it should do as little as
|
|
|
|
possible, never block, and never call back into the qemu
|
|
|
|
monitor. Everything after this is handled in the context of a worker
|
|
|
|
thread, so it has more freedom to make qemu monitor calls and blocking
|
|
|
|
system calls on the host.)
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
When the worker thread gets the event, it calls::
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qemuProcessEventHandler()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which switches on the eventType (in our example,
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
``QEMU_PROCESS_EVENT_NIC_RX_FILTER_CHANGED``) and decides to call::
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
processNicRxFilterChangedEvent()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and *that* is where the actual work will be done (and any
|
2022-05-13 11:13:02 +00:00
|
|
|
event-specific memory allocated during ``qemuProcessHandleXXX()`` will be
|
2014-10-02 15:46:30 +00:00
|
|
|
freed). Note that this function must do proper refcounting of the
|
|
|
|
domain object, and assure that the domain is still active prior to
|
|
|
|
performing any operations - it is possible that the domain could have
|
|
|
|
been destroyed between the time the event was received and the time
|
|
|
|
that it is processed, and it is also possible that the domain could be
|
|
|
|
destroyed *during* the event processing if it doesn't get properly
|
|
|
|
referenced by the handler.
|