2022-04-05 11:58:56 +00:00
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
libvirt RPC infrastructure
|
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. contents::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
libvirt includes a basic protocol and code to implement an extensible, secure
|
|
|
|
client/server RPC service. This was originally designed for communication
|
|
|
|
between the libvirt client library and the libvirtd daemon, but the code is now
|
|
|
|
isolated to allow reuse in other areas of libvirt code. This document provides
|
|
|
|
an overview of the protocol and structure / operation of the internal RPC
|
|
|
|
library APIs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RPC protocol
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
libvirt uses a simple, variable length, packet based RPC protocol. All
|
|
|
|
structured data within packets is encoded using the `XDR
|
|
|
|
standard <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_Data_Representation>`__ as
|
|
|
|
currently defined by `RFC 4506 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4506>`__. On any
|
|
|
|
connection running the RPC protocol, there can be multiple programs active, each
|
|
|
|
supporting one or more versions. A program defines a set of procedures that it
|
|
|
|
supports. The procedures can support call+reply method invocation, asynchronous
|
|
|
|
events, and generic data streams. Method invocations can be overlapped, so
|
|
|
|
waiting for a reply to one will not block the receipt of the reply to another
|
|
|
|
outstanding method. The protocol was loosely inspired by the design of SunRPC.
|
|
|
|
The definition of the RPC protocol is in the file ``src/rpc/virnetprotocol.x``
|
|
|
|
in the libvirt source tree.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-31 13:07:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Packet framing
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2022-04-05 11:58:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the wire, there is no explicit packet framing marker. Instead each packet is
|
|
|
|
preceded by an unsigned 32-bit integer giving the total length of the packet in
|
|
|
|
bytes. This length includes the 4-bytes of the length word itself. Conceptually
|
|
|
|
the framing looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|~~~ Packet 1 ~~~|~~~ Packet 2 ~~~|~~~ Packet 3 ~~~|~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+-------+------------+-------+------------+-------+------------+...
|
|
|
|
| n=U32 | (n-4) * U8 | n=U32 | (n-4) * U8 | n=U32 | (n-4) * U8 |
|
|
|
|
+-------+------------+-------+------------+-------+------------+...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|~ Len ~|~ Data ~|~ Len ~|~ Data ~|~ Len ~|~ Data ~|~
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-31 13:07:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Packet data
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2022-04-05 11:58:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The data in each packet is split into two parts, a short fixed length header,
|
|
|
|
followed by a variable length payload. So a packet from the illustration above
|
|
|
|
is more correctly shown as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+-------+-------------+---------------....---+
|
|
|
|
| n=U32 | 6*U32 | (n-(7*4))*U8 |
|
|
|
|
+-------+-------------+---------------....---+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|~ Len ~|~ Header ~|~ Payload .... ~|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-31 13:07:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Packet header
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2022-04-05 11:58:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The header contains 6 fields, encoded as signed/unsigned 32-bit integers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
| program=U32 |
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
| version=U32 |
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
| procedure=S32 |
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
| type=S32 |
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
| serial=U32 |
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
| status=S32 |
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``program``
|
|
|
|
This is an arbitrarily chosen number that will uniquely identify the
|
|
|
|
"service" running over the stream.
|
|
|
|
``version``
|
|
|
|
This is the version number of the program, by convention starting from '1'.
|
|
|
|
When an incompatible change is made to a program, the version number is
|
|
|
|
incremented. Ideally both versions will then be supported on the wire in
|
|
|
|
parallel for backwards compatibility.
|
|
|
|
``procedure``
|
|
|
|
This is an arbitrarily chosen number that will uniquely identify the method
|
|
|
|
call, or event associated with the packet. By convention, procedure numbers
|
|
|
|
start from 1 and are assigned monotonically thereafter.
|
|
|
|
``type``
|
|
|
|
This can be one of the following enumeration values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. call: invocation of a method call
|
|
|
|
#. reply: completion of a method call
|
|
|
|
#. event: an asynchronous event
|
|
|
|
#. stream: control info or data from a stream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``serial``
|
|
|
|
This is a number that starts from 1 and increases each time a method call
|
|
|
|
packet is sent. A reply or stream packet will have a serial number matching
|
|
|
|
the original method call packet serial. Events always have the serial number
|
|
|
|
set to 0.
|
|
|
|
``status``
|
|
|
|
This can one of the following enumeration values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. ok: a normal packet. this is always set for method calls or events. For
|
|
|
|
replies it indicates successful completion of the method. For streams it
|
|
|
|
indicates confirmation of the end of file on the stream.
|
|
|
|
#. error: for replies this indicates that the method call failed and error
|
|
|
|
information is being returned. For streams this indicates that not all
|
|
|
|
data was sent and the stream has aborted
|
|
|
|
#. continue: for streams this indicates that further data packets will be
|
|
|
|
following
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-31 13:07:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Packet payload
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2022-04-05 11:58:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The payload of a packet will vary depending on the ``type`` and ``status``
|
|
|
|
fields from the header.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- type=call: the in parameters for the method call, XDR encoded
|
|
|
|
- type=call-with-fds: number of file handles, then the in parameters for the
|
|
|
|
method call, XDR encoded, followed by the file handles
|
|
|
|
- type=reply+status=ok: the return value and/or out parameters for the method
|
|
|
|
call, XDR encoded
|
|
|
|
- type=reply+status=error: the error information for the method, a virErrorPtr
|
|
|
|
XDR encoded
|
|
|
|
- type=reply-with-fds+status=ok: number of file handles, the return value
|
|
|
|
and/or out parameters for the method call, XDR encoded, followed by the file
|
|
|
|
handles
|
|
|
|
- type=reply-with-fds+status=error: number of file handles, the error
|
|
|
|
information for the method, a virErrorPtr XDR encoded, followed by the file
|
|
|
|
handles
|
|
|
|
- type=event: the parameters for the event, XDR encoded
|
|
|
|
- type=stream+status=ok: no payload
|
|
|
|
- type=stream+status=error: the error information for the method, a virErrorPtr
|
|
|
|
XDR encoded
|
|
|
|
- type=stream+status=continue: the raw bytes of data for the stream. No XDR
|
|
|
|
encoding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the two packet types that support passing file descriptors, in between the
|
|
|
|
header and the payload there will be a 4-byte integer specifying the number of
|
|
|
|
file descriptors which are being sent. The actual file handles are sent after
|
|
|
|
the payload has been sent. Each file handle has a single dummy byte transmitted
|
|
|
|
as a carrier for the out of band file descriptor. While the sender should always
|
|
|
|
send '\0' as the dummy byte value, the receiver ought to ignore the value for
|
|
|
|
the sake of robustness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the exact payload information for each procedure, consult the XDR protocol
|
|
|
|
definition for the program+version in question
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wire examples
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following diagrams illustrate some example packet exchanges between a client
|
|
|
|
and server
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method call
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A single method call and successful reply, for a program=8, version=1,
|
|
|
|
procedure=3, which 10 bytes worth of input args, and 4 bytes worth of return
|
|
|
|
values. The overall input packet length is 4 + 24 + 10 == 38, and output packet
|
|
|
|
length 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method call with error
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An unsuccessful method call will instead return an error object
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------------------------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |48| 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo.o.oOo.o.oOo.o.oOo | <-- S (error)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method call with upload stream
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A method call which also involves uploading some data over a stream will result
|
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |24| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | --> S (stream finish)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |24| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | <-- S (stream finish)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method call bidirectional stream
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A method call which also involves a bi-directional stream will result in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | <-- S (stream data down)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | <-- S (stream data down)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | <-- S (stream data down)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | <-- S (stream data down)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | .o.oOo.o.oOo....o.oOo. | --> S (stream data up)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-------------....-------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |24| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | --> S (stream finish)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |24| 8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | <-- S (stream finish)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method calls overlapping
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call 1)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call 2)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply 2)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call 3)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply 3)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |38| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | .o.oOo.o. | --> S (call 4)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply 1)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply 4)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method call with passed FD
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A single method call with 2 passed file descriptors and successful reply, for a
|
|
|
|
program=8, version=1, procedure=3, which 10 bytes worth of input args, and 4
|
|
|
|
bytes worth of return values. The number of file descriptors is encoded as a
|
|
|
|
32-bit int. Each file descriptor then has a 1 byte dummy payload. The overall
|
|
|
|
input packet length is 4 + 24 + 4 + 2 + 10 == 44, and output packet length 32.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+---------------+-------+
|
|
|
|
C --> |44| 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | .o.oOo.o. | 0 | 0 | --> S (call)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+---------------+-------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
C <-- |32| 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .o.oOo | <-- S (reply)
|
|
|
|
+--+-----------------------+--------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RPC security
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are various things to consider to ensure an implementation of the RPC
|
|
|
|
protocol can be satisfactorily secured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authentication/encryption
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The basic RPC protocol does not define or require any specific
|
|
|
|
authentication/encryption capabilities. A generic solution to providing
|
|
|
|
encryption for the protocol is to run the protocol over a TLS encrypted data
|
|
|
|
stream. x509 certificate checks can be done to form a crude authentication
|
|
|
|
mechanism. It is also possible for an RPC program to negotiate an encryption /
|
|
|
|
authentication capability, such as SASL, which may then also provide per-packet
|
|
|
|
data encryption. Finally the protocol data stream can of course be tunnelled
|
|
|
|
over transports such as SSH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data limits
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although the protocol itself defines many arbitrary sized data values in the
|
|
|
|
payloads, to avoid denial of service attack there are a number of size limit
|
|
|
|
checks prior to encoding or decoding data. There is a limit on the maximum size
|
|
|
|
of a single RPC message, limit on the maximum string length, and limits on any
|
|
|
|
other parameter which uses a variable length array. These limits can be raised,
|
|
|
|
subject to agreement between client/server, without otherwise breaking
|
|
|
|
compatibility of the RPC data on the wire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data validation
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is important that all data be fully validated before performing any actions
|
|
|
|
based on the data. When reading an RPC packet, the first four bytes must be read
|
|
|
|
and the max packet size limit validated, before any attempt is made to read the
|
|
|
|
variable length packet data. After a complete packet has been read, the header
|
|
|
|
must be decoded and all 6 fields fully validated, before attempting to dispatch
|
|
|
|
the payload. Once dispatched, the payload can be decoded and passed on to the
|
|
|
|
appropriate API for execution. The RPC code must not take any action based on
|
|
|
|
the payload, since it has no way to validate the semantics of the payload data.
|
|
|
|
It must delegate this to the execution API (e.g. corresponding libvirt public
|
|
|
|
API).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RPC internal APIs
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The generic internal RPC library code lives in the ``src/rpc/`` directory of the
|
|
|
|
libvirt source tree. Unless otherwise noted, the objects are all threadsafe. The
|
|
|
|
core object types and their purposes are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of RPC objects
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a high level overview of the role of each of the main RPC
|
|
|
|
objects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``virNetSASLContext *`` (virnetsaslcontext.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetSASLContext APIs maintain SASL state for a network service (server
|
|
|
|
or client). This is primarily used on the server to provide an access control
|
|
|
|
list of SASL usernames permitted as clients.
|
|
|
|
``virNetSASLSession *`` (virnetsaslcontext.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetSASLSession APIs maintain SASL state for a single network
|
|
|
|
connection (socket). This is used to perform the multi-step SASL handshake
|
|
|
|
and perform encryption/decryption of data once authenticated, via integration
|
|
|
|
with virNetSocket.
|
|
|
|
``virNetTLSContext *`` (virnettlscontext.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetTLSContext APIs maintain TLS state for a network service (server or
|
|
|
|
client). This is primarily used on the server to provide an access control
|
|
|
|
list of x509 distinguished names, as well as diffie-hellman keys. It can also
|
|
|
|
do validation of x509 certificates prior to initiating a connection, in order
|
|
|
|
to improve detection of configuration errors.
|
|
|
|
``virNetTLSSession *`` (virnettlscontext.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetTLSSession APIs maintain TLS state for a single network connection
|
|
|
|
(socket). This is used to perform the multi-step TLS handshake and perform
|
|
|
|
encryption/decryption of data once authenticated, via integration with
|
|
|
|
virNetSocket.
|
|
|
|
``virNetSocket *`` (virnetsocket.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetSocket APIs provide a higher level wrapper around the raw BSD
|
|
|
|
sockets and getaddrinfo APIs. They allow for creation of both server and
|
|
|
|
client sockets. Data transports supported are TCP, UNIX, SSH tunnel or
|
|
|
|
external command tunnel. Internally the TCP socket impl uses the getaddrinfo
|
|
|
|
info APIs to ensure correct protocol-independent behaviour, thus supporting
|
|
|
|
both IPv4 and IPv6. The socket APIs can be associated with a
|
|
|
|
virNetSASLSession \*or virNetTLSSession \*object to allow seamless
|
|
|
|
encryption/decryption of all writes and reads. For UNIX sockets it is
|
|
|
|
possible to obtain the remote client user ID and process ID. Integration with
|
|
|
|
the libvirt event loop also allows use of callbacks for notification of
|
|
|
|
various I/O conditions
|
|
|
|
``virNetMessage *`` (virnetmessage.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetMessage APIs provide a wrapper around the libxdr API calls, to
|
|
|
|
facilitate processing and creation of RPC packets. There are convenience APIs
|
|
|
|
for encoding/encoding the packet headers, encoding/decoding the payload using
|
|
|
|
an XDR filter, encoding/decoding a raw payload (for streams), and encoding a
|
|
|
|
virErrorPtr object. There is also a means to add to/serve from a linked-list
|
|
|
|
queue of messages.
|
|
|
|
``virNetClient *`` (virnetclient.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetClient APIs provide a way to connect to a remote server and run one
|
|
|
|
or more RPC protocols over the connection. Connections can be made over TCP,
|
|
|
|
UNIX sockets, SSH tunnels, or external command tunnels. There is support for
|
|
|
|
both TLS and SASL session encryption. The client also supports management of
|
|
|
|
multiple data streams over each connection. Each client object can be used
|
|
|
|
from multiple threads concurrently, with method calls/replies being
|
|
|
|
interleaved on the wire as required.
|
|
|
|
``virNetClientProgram *`` (virnetclientprogram.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetClientProgram APIs are used to register a program+version with the
|
|
|
|
connection. This then enables invocation of method calls, receipt of
|
|
|
|
asynchronous events and use of data streams, within that program+version.
|
|
|
|
When created a set of callbacks must be supplied to take care of dispatching
|
|
|
|
any incoming asynchronous events.
|
|
|
|
``virNetClientStream *`` (virnetclientstream.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetClientStream APIs are used to control transmission and receipt of
|
|
|
|
data over a stream active on a client. Streams provide a low latency,
|
|
|
|
unlimited length, bi-directional raw data exchange mechanism layered over the
|
|
|
|
RPC connection
|
|
|
|
``virNetServer *`` (virnetserver.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetServer APIs are used to manage a network server. A server exposed
|
|
|
|
one or more programs, over one or more services. It manages multiple client
|
|
|
|
connections invoking multiple RPC calls in parallel, with dispatch across
|
|
|
|
multiple worker threads.
|
|
|
|
``virNetDaemon *`` (virnetdaemon.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetDaemon APIs are used to manage a daemon process. A daemon is a
|
|
|
|
process that might expose one or more servers. It handles most
|
|
|
|
process-related details, network-related should be part of the underlying
|
|
|
|
server.
|
|
|
|
``virNetServerClient *`` (virnetserverclient.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetServerClient APIs are used to manage I/O related to a single client
|
|
|
|
network connection. It handles initial validation and routing of incoming RPC
|
|
|
|
packets, and transmission of outgoing packets.
|
|
|
|
``virNetServerProgram *`` (virnetserverprogram.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetServerProgram APIs are used to provide the implementation of a
|
|
|
|
single program/version set. Primarily this includes a set of callbacks used
|
|
|
|
to actually invoke the APIs corresponding to program procedure numbers. It is
|
|
|
|
responsible for all the serialization of payloads to/from XDR.
|
|
|
|
``virNetServerService *`` (virnetserverservice.h)
|
|
|
|
The virNetServerService APIs are used to connect the server to one or more
|
|
|
|
network protocols. A single service may involve multiple sockets (ie both
|
|
|
|
IPv4 and IPv6). A service also has an associated authentication policy for
|
|
|
|
incoming clients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client RPC dispatch
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The client RPC code must allow for multiple overlapping RPC method calls to be
|
|
|
|
invoked, transmission and receipt of data for multiple streams and receipt of
|
|
|
|
asynchronous events. Understandably this involves coordination of multiple
|
|
|
|
threads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The core requirement in the client dispatch code is that only one thread is
|
|
|
|
allowed to be performing I/O on the socket at any time. This thread is said to
|
|
|
|
be "holding the buck". When any other thread comes along and needs to do I/O it
|
|
|
|
must place its packets on a queue and delegate processing of them to the thread
|
|
|
|
that has the buck. This thread will send out the method call, and if it sees a
|
|
|
|
reply will pass it back to the waiting thread. If the other thread's reply
|
|
|
|
hasn't arrived, by the time the main thread has got its own reply, then it will
|
|
|
|
transfer responsibility for I/O to the thread that has been waiting the longest.
|
|
|
|
It is said to be "passing the buck" for I/O.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When no thread is performing any RPC method call, or sending stream data there
|
|
|
|
is still a need to monitor the socket for incoming I/O related to asynchronous
|
|
|
|
events, or stream data receipt. For this task, a watch is registered with the
|
|
|
|
event loop which triggers whenever the socket is readable. This watch is
|
|
|
|
automatically disabled whenever any other thread grabs the buck, and re-enabled
|
|
|
|
when the buck is released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example with buck passing
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first example, a second thread issues an API call while the first thread
|
|
|
|
holds the buck. The reply to the first call arrives first, so the buck is passed
|
|
|
|
to the second thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Call API1()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Grab Buck
|
|
|
|
| Thread-2
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Send method1 V
|
|
|
|
| Call API2()
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O V
|
|
|
|
|<--------Queue method2
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Send method2 V
|
|
|
|
| Wait for buck
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Recv reply1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Pass the buck----->|
|
|
|
|
| V
|
|
|
|
V Wait I/O
|
|
|
|
Return API1() |
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Recv reply2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Release the buck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Return API2()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example without buck passing
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this second example, a second thread issues an API call which is sent and
|
|
|
|
replied to, before the first thread's API call has completed. The first thread
|
|
|
|
thus notifies the second that its reply is ready, and there is no need to pass
|
|
|
|
the buck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Call API1()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Grab Buck
|
|
|
|
| Thread-2
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Send method1 V
|
|
|
|
| Call API2()
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O V
|
|
|
|
|<--------Queue method2
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Send method2 V
|
|
|
|
| Wait for buck
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Recv reply2 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Notify reply2------>|
|
|
|
|
| V
|
|
|
|
V Return API2()
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Recv reply1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Release the buck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Return API1()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example with async events
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this example, only one thread is present and it has to deal with some async
|
|
|
|
events arriving. The events are actually dispatched to the application from the
|
|
|
|
event loop thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Call API1()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Grab Buck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Send method1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O
|
|
|
|
| Event thread
|
|
|
|
V ...
|
|
|
|
Recv event1 |
|
|
|
|
| V
|
|
|
|
V Wait for timer/fd
|
|
|
|
Queue event1 |
|
|
|
|
| V
|
|
|
|
V Timer fires
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O |
|
|
|
|
| V
|
|
|
|
V Emit event1
|
|
|
|
Recv reply1 |
|
|
|
|
| V
|
|
|
|
V Wait for timer/fd
|
|
|
|
Return API1() |
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Server RPC dispatch
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The RPC server code must support receipt of incoming RPC requests from multiple
|
|
|
|
client connections, and parallel processing of all RPC requests, even many from
|
|
|
|
a single client. This goal is achieved through a combination of event driven
|
|
|
|
I/O, and multiple processing threads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main libvirt event loop thread is responsible for performing all socket I/O.
|
|
|
|
It will read incoming packets from clients and will transmit outgoing packets to
|
|
|
|
clients. It will handle the I/O to/from streams associated with client API
|
|
|
|
calls. When doing client I/O it will also pass the data through any applicable
|
|
|
|
encryption layer (through use of the virNetSocket / virNetTLSSession and
|
|
|
|
virNetSASLSession integration). What is paramount is that the event loop thread
|
|
|
|
never do any task that can take a non-trivial amount of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When reading packets, the event loop will first read the 4 byte length word.
|
|
|
|
This is validated to make sure it does not exceed the maximum permissible packet
|
|
|
|
size, and the client is set to allow receipt of the rest of the packet data.
|
|
|
|
Once a complete packet has been received, the next step is to decode the RPC
|
|
|
|
header. The header is validated to ensure the request is sensible, ie the server
|
|
|
|
should not receive a method reply from a client. If the client has not yet
|
|
|
|
authenticated, an access control list check is also performed to make sure the
|
|
|
|
procedure is one of those allowed prior to auth. If the packet is a method call,
|
|
|
|
it will be placed on a global processing queue. The event loop thread is now
|
|
|
|
done with the packet for the time being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The server has a pool of worker threads, which wait for method call packets to
|
|
|
|
be queued. One of them will grab the new method call off the queue for
|
|
|
|
processing. The first step is to decode the payload of the packet to extract the
|
|
|
|
method call arguments. The worker does not attempt to do any semantic validation
|
|
|
|
of the arguments, except to make sure the size of any variable length fields is
|
|
|
|
below defined limits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The worker now invokes the libvirt API call that corresponds to the procedure
|
|
|
|
number in the packet header. The worker is thus kept busy until the API call
|
|
|
|
completes. The implementation of the API call is responsible for doing semantic
|
|
|
|
validation of parameters and any MAC security checks on the objects affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the API call has completed, the worker thread will take the return value
|
|
|
|
and output parameters, or error object and encode them into a reply packet.
|
|
|
|
Again it does not attempt to do any semantic validation of output data, aside
|
|
|
|
from variable length field limit checks. The worker thread puts the reply packet
|
|
|
|
on the transmission queue for the client. The worker is now finished and goes
|
|
|
|
back to wait for another incoming method call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main event loop is back in charge and when the client socket becomes
|
|
|
|
writable, it will start sending the method reply packet back to the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At any time the libvirt connection object can emit asynchronous events. These
|
|
|
|
are handled by callbacks in the main event thread. The callback will simply
|
|
|
|
encode the event parameters into a new data packet and place the packet on the
|
|
|
|
client transmission queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incoming and outgoing stream packets are also directly handled by the main event
|
|
|
|
thread. When an incoming stream packet is received, instead of placing it in the
|
|
|
|
global dispatch queue for the worker threads, it is sidetracked into a
|
|
|
|
per-stream processing queue. When the stream becomes writable, queued incoming
|
|
|
|
stream packets will be processed, passing their data payload on the stream.
|
|
|
|
Conversely when the stream becomes readable, chunks of data will be read from
|
|
|
|
it, encoded into new outgoing packets, and placed on the client's transmit
|
|
|
|
queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example with overlapping methods
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This example illustrates processing of two incoming methods with overlapping
|
|
|
|
execution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event thread Worker 1 Worker 2
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
V V V
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O Wait Job Wait Job
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
V | |
|
|
|
|
Recv method1 | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
V | |
|
|
|
|
Queue method1 V |
|
|
|
|
| Serve method1 |
|
|
|
|
V | |
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O V |
|
|
|
|
| Call API1() |
|
|
|
|
V | |
|
|
|
|
Recv method2 | |
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
V | |
|
|
|
|
Queue method2 | V
|
|
|
|
| | Serve method2
|
|
|
|
V V |
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O Return API1() V
|
|
|
|
| | Call API2()
|
|
|
|
| V |
|
|
|
|
V Queue reply1 |
|
|
|
|
Send reply1 | |
|
|
|
|
| V V
|
|
|
|
V Wait Job Return API2()
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O | |
|
|
|
|
| ... V
|
|
|
|
V Queue reply2
|
|
|
|
Send reply2 |
|
|
|
|
| V
|
|
|
|
V Wait Job
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O |
|
|
|
|
| ...
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example with stream data
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This example illustrates processing of stream data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Recv stream1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Queue stream1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Recv stream2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Queue stream2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Write stream1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Write stream2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
Wait I/O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...
|