qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
LC_ALL=C \
|
|
|
|
|
PATH=/bin \
|
2019-03-06 12:29:01 +00:00
|
|
|
HOME=/tmp/lib/domain--1-q35-test \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
USER=test \
|
|
|
|
|
LOGNAME=test \
|
2019-03-08 11:15:07 +00:00
|
|
|
XDG_DATA_HOME=/tmp/lib/domain--1-q35-test/.local/share \
|
|
|
|
|
XDG_CACHE_HOME=/tmp/lib/domain--1-q35-test/.cache \
|
|
|
|
|
XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/tmp/lib/domain--1-q35-test/.config \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none \
|
2017-04-06 16:19:48 +00:00
|
|
|
/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 \
|
2021-08-10 14:39:38 +00:00
|
|
|
-name guest=q35-test,debug-threads=on \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-S \
|
2021-09-21 15:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
-object secret,id=masterKey0,format=raw,file=/tmp/lib/domain--1-q35-test/master-key.aes \
|
2021-11-05 08:38:10 +00:00
|
|
|
-machine q35,usb=off,dump-guest-core=off \
|
|
|
|
|
-accel tcg \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-m 2048 \
|
2022-02-10 11:57:26 +00:00
|
|
|
-overcommit mem-lock=off \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 \
|
|
|
|
|
-uuid 11dbdcdd-4c3b-482b-8903-9bdb8c0a2774 \
|
2018-03-29 10:51:55 +00:00
|
|
|
-display none \
|
2018-03-29 10:51:55 +00:00
|
|
|
-no-user-config \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-nodefaults \
|
2022-02-03 12:31:28 +00:00
|
|
|
-chardev socket,id=charmonitor,fd=1729,server=on,wait=off \
|
2018-03-28 22:04:58 +00:00
|
|
|
-mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control \
|
2018-03-29 10:51:55 +00:00
|
|
|
-rtc base=utc \
|
2018-03-29 10:51:55 +00:00
|
|
|
-no-shutdown \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-no-acpi \
|
2021-09-20 14:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
-boot strict=on \
|
2021-10-04 21:07:44 +00:00
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=16,chassis=1,id=pci.1,bus=pcie.0,multifunction=on,addr=0x2 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=17,chassis=2,id=pci.2,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x1 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=18,chassis=3,id=pci.3,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x2 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=19,chassis=4,id=pci.4,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x3 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=20,chassis=5,id=pci.5,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x4 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=21,chassis=6,id=pci.6,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x5 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=22,chassis=7,id=pci.7,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x6 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=23,chassis=8,id=pci.8,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x7 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=24,chassis=9,id=pci.9,bus=pcie.0,multifunction=on,addr=0x3 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=25,chassis=10,id=pci.10,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x3.0x1 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=26,chassis=11,id=pci.11,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x3.0x2 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=27,chassis=12,id=pci.12,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x3.0x3 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=28,chassis=13,id=pci.13,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x3.0x4 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device ioh3420,port=29,chassis=14,id=pci.14,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x3.0x5 \
|
2016-09-19 21:11:20 +00:00
|
|
|
-device nec-usb-xhci,id=usb,bus=pci.6,addr=0x0 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi0,bus=pci.5,addr=0x0 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device virtio-serial-pci,id=virtio-serial0,bus=pci.4,addr=0x0 \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-drive file=/dev/HostVG/QEMUGuest1,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk1 \
|
2021-03-31 08:46:36 +00:00
|
|
|
-device virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.7,addr=0x0,drive=drive-virtio-disk1,id=virtio-disk1,bootindex=1 \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-fsdev local,security_model=passthrough,id=fsdev-fs0,path=/export/to/guest \
|
2021-03-31 08:46:36 +00:00
|
|
|
-device virtio-9p-pci,id=fs0,fsdev=fsdev-fs0,mount_tag=/import/from/host,bus=pci.1,addr=0x0 \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-netdev user,id=hostnet0 \
|
2021-03-31 08:46:36 +00:00
|
|
|
-device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55,bus=pci.2,addr=0x0 \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-netdev user,id=hostnet1 \
|
2021-03-31 08:46:36 +00:00
|
|
|
-device e1000e,netdev=hostnet1,id=net1,mac=00:11:22:33:44:66,bus=pci.3,addr=0x0 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device virtio-input-host-pci,id=input0,evdev=/dev/input/event1234,bus=pci.10,addr=0x0 \
|
2016-09-19 21:11:20 +00:00
|
|
|
-device virtio-mouse-pci,id=input1,bus=pci.11,addr=0x0 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device virtio-keyboard-pci,id=input2,bus=pci.12,addr=0x0 \
|
|
|
|
|
-device virtio-tablet-pci,id=input3,bus=pci.13,addr=0x0 \
|
2022-01-18 15:19:03 +00:00
|
|
|
-device virtio-gpu-pci,id=video0,max_outputs=1,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x1 \
|
2016-09-19 21:11:20 +00:00
|
|
|
-device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.8,addr=0x0 \
|
qemu: auto-add pcie-root-port/dmi-to-pci-bridge controllers as needed
Previously libvirt would only add pci-bridge devices automatically
when an address was requested for a device that required a legacy PCI
slot and none was available. This patch expands that support to
dmi-to-pci-bridge (which is needed in order to add a pci-bridge on a
machine with a pcie-root), and pcie-root-port (which is needed to add
a hotpluggable PCIe device). It does *not* automatically add
pcie-switch-upstream-ports or pcie-switch-downstream-ports (and
currently there are no plans for that).
Given the existing code to auto-add pci-bridge devices, automatically
adding pcie-root-ports is fairly straightforward. The
dmi-to-pci-bridge support is a bit tricky though, for a few reasons:
1) Although the only reason to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge is so that
there is a reasonable place to plug in a pci-bridge controller,
most of the time it's not the presence of a pci-bridge *in the
config* that triggers the requirement to add a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Rather, it is the presence of a legacy-PCI device in the config,
which triggers auto-add of a pci-bridge, which triggers auto-add of
a dmi-to-pci-bridge (this is handled in
virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow() - if there's a request to add a
pci-bridge we'll check if there is a suitable bus to plug it into;
if not, we first add a dmi-to-pci-bridge).
2) Once there is already a single dmi-to-pci-bridge on the system,
there won't be a need for any more, even if it's full, as long as
there is a pci-bridge with an open slot - you can also plug
pci-bridges into existing pci-bridges. So we have to make sure we
don't add a dmi-to-pci-bridge unless there aren't any
dmi-to-pci-bridges *or* any pci-bridges.
3) Although it is strongly discouraged, it is legal for a pci-bridge
to be directly plugged into pcie-root, and we don't want to
auto-add a dmi-to-pci-bridge if there is already a pci-bridge
that's been forced directly into pcie-root.
Although libvirt will now automatically create a dmi-to-pci-bridge
when it's needed, the code still remains for now that forces a
dmi-to-pci-bridge on all domains with pcie-root (in
qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices()). That will be removed in a future
patch.
For now, the pcie-root-ports are added one to a slot, which is a bit
wasteful and means it will fail after 31 total PCIe devices (30 if
there are also some PCI devices), but helps keep the changeset down
for this patch. A future patch will have 8 pcie-root-ports sharing the
functions on a single slot.
2016-09-19 18:38:47 +00:00
|
|
|
-object rng-random,id=objrng0,filename=/dev/urandom \
|
2021-08-10 15:07:10 +00:00
|
|
|
-device virtio-rng-pci,rng=objrng0,id=rng0,max-bytes=123,period=1234,bus=pci.9,addr=0x0 \
|
|
|
|
|
-msg timestamp=on
|
