libvirt/src/network/bridge_driver_linux.c

783 lines
26 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* bridge_driver_linux.c: Linux implementation of bridge driver
*
* Copyright (C) 2006-2013 Red Hat, Inc.
* Copyright (C) 2006 Daniel P. Berrange
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library. If not, see
* <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include <config.h>
#include "viralloc.h"
#include "virfile.h"
#include "viriptables.h"
#include "virstring.h"
#include "virlog.h"
#include "virfirewall.h"
network: set firewalld zone of bridges to "libvirt" zone when appropriate This patch restores broken guest network connectivity after a host firewalld is switched to using an nftables backend. It does this by adding libvirt networks' bridge interfaces to the new "libvirt" zone in firewalld. After this patch, the bridge interface of any network created by libvirt (when firewalld is active) will be added to the firewalld zone called "libvirt" if it exists (regardless of the firewalld backend setting). This behavior does *not* depend on whether or not libvirt has installed the libvirt zone file (set with "--with[out]-firewalld-zone" during the configure phase of the package build). If the libvirt zone doesn't exist (either because the package was configured to not install it, or possibly it was installed, but firewalld doesn't support rule priorities, resulting in a parse error), the bridge will remain in firewalld's default zone, which could be innocuous (in the case that the firewalld backend is iptables, guest networking will still function properly with the bridge in the default zone), or it could be disastrous (if the firewalld backend is nftables, we can be assured that guest networking will fail). In order to be unobtrusive in the former case, and informative in the latter, when the libvirt zone doesn't exist we then check the firewalld version to see if it's new enough to support the nftables backend, and then if the backend is actually set to nftables, before logging an error (and failing the net-start operation, since the network couldn't possibly work anyway). When the libvirt zone is used, network behavior is *slightly* different from behavior of previous libvirt. In the past, libvirt network behavior would be affected by the configuration of firewalld's default zone (usually "public"), but now it is affected only by the "libvirt" zone), and thus almost surely warrants a release note for any distro upgrading to libvirt 5.1 or above. Although it's unfortunate that we have to deal with a mandatory behavior change, the architecture of multiple hooks makes it impossible to *not* change behavior in some way, and the new behavior is arguably better (since it will now be possible to manage access to the host from virtual machines vs from public interfaces separately). Creates-and-Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1650320 Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1638342 Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@laine.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
2018-10-16 00:31:02 +00:00
#include "virfirewalld.h"
#define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE
VIR_LOG_INIT("network.bridge_driver_linux");
#define PROC_NET_ROUTE "/proc/net/route"
util: move virtual network firwall rules into private chains The previous commit created new chains to hold the firewall rules. This commit changes the code that creates rules to place them in the new private chains instead of the builtin top level chains. With two networks running, the rules in the filter table now look like -N LIBVIRT_FWI -N LIBVIRT_FWO -N LIBVIRT_FWX -N LIBVIRT_INP -N LIBVIRT_OUT -A INPUT -j LIBVIRT_INP -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWX -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWI -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWO -A OUTPUT -j LIBVIRT_OUT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.0.0/24 -o virbr0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.1.0/24 -o virbr1 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.0.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.1.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT While in the nat table: -N LIBVIRT_PRT -A POSTROUTING -j LIBVIRT_PRT -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/24 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 255.255.255.255/32 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/24 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 255.255.255.255/32 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE And finally the mangle table: -N LIBVIRT_PRT -A POSTROUTING -j LIBVIRT_PRT -A LIBVIRT_PRT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill -A LIBVIRT_PRT -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
2018-12-05 15:53:55 +00:00
int networkPreReloadFirewallRules(bool startup)
{
util: create private chains for virtual network firewall rules Historically firewall rules for virtual networks were added straight into the base chains. This works but has a number of bugs and design limitations: - It is inflexible for admins wanting to add extra rules ahead of libvirt's rules, via hook scripts. - It is not clear to the admin that the rules were created by libvirt - Each rule must be deleted by libvirt individually since they are all directly in the builtin chains - The ordering of rules in the forward chain is incorrect when multiple networks are created, allowing traffic to mistakenly flow between networks in one direction. To address all of these problems, libvirt needs to move to creating rules in its own private chains. In the top level builtin chains, libvirt will add links to its own private top level chains. Addressing the traffic ordering bug requires some extra steps. With everything going into the FORWARD chain there was interleaving of rules for outbound traffic and inbound traffic for each network: -A FORWARD -d 192.168.3.0/24 -o virbr1 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -s 192.168.3.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -i virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -d 192.168.2.0/24 -o virbr0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -s 192.168.2.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable The rule allowing outbound traffic from virbr1 would mistakenly allow packets from virbr1 to virbr0, before the rule denying input to virbr0 gets a chance to run. What we really need todo is group the forwarding rules into three distinct sets: * Cross rules - LIBVIRT_FWX -A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT * Incoming rules - LIBVIRT_FWI -A FORWARD -d 192.168.3.0/24 -o virbr1 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -d 192.168.2.0/24 -o virbr0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable * Outgoing rules - LIBVIRT_FWO -A FORWARD -s 192.168.3.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -s 192.168.2.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable There is thus no risk of outgoing rules for one network mistakenly allowing incoming traffic for another network, as all incoming rules are evalated first. With this in mind, we'll thus need three distinct chains linked from the FORWARD chain, so we end up with: INPUT --> LIBVIRT_INP (filter) OUTPUT --> LIBVIRT_OUT (filter) FORWARD +-> LIBVIRT_FWX (filter) +-> LIBVIRT_FWO \-> LIBVIRT_FWI POSTROUTING --> LIBVIRT_PRT (nat & mangle) Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
2018-10-31 19:33:21 +00:00
int ret = iptablesSetupPrivateChains();
if (ret < 0)
return -1;
util: move virtual network firwall rules into private chains The previous commit created new chains to hold the firewall rules. This commit changes the code that creates rules to place them in the new private chains instead of the builtin top level chains. With two networks running, the rules in the filter table now look like -N LIBVIRT_FWI -N LIBVIRT_FWO -N LIBVIRT_FWX -N LIBVIRT_INP -N LIBVIRT_OUT -A INPUT -j LIBVIRT_INP -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWX -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWI -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWO -A OUTPUT -j LIBVIRT_OUT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.0.0/24 -o virbr0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.1.0/24 -o virbr1 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.0.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.1.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT While in the nat table: -N LIBVIRT_PRT -A POSTROUTING -j LIBVIRT_PRT -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/24 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 255.255.255.255/32 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/24 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 255.255.255.255/32 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE And finally the mangle table: -N LIBVIRT_PRT -A POSTROUTING -j LIBVIRT_PRT -A LIBVIRT_PRT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill -A LIBVIRT_PRT -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
2018-12-05 15:53:55 +00:00
/*
* If this is initial startup, and we just created the
* top level private chains we either
*
* - upgraded from old libvirt
* - freshly booted from clean state
*
* In the first case we must delete the old rules from
* the built-in chains, instead of our new private chains.
* In the second case it doesn't matter, since no existing
* rules will be present. Thus we can safely just tell it
* to always delete from the builin chain
*/
if (startup && ret == 1)
iptablesSetDeletePrivate(false);
return 0;
}
void networkPostReloadFirewallRules(bool startup ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
util: move virtual network firwall rules into private chains The previous commit created new chains to hold the firewall rules. This commit changes the code that creates rules to place them in the new private chains instead of the builtin top level chains. With two networks running, the rules in the filter table now look like -N LIBVIRT_FWI -N LIBVIRT_FWO -N LIBVIRT_FWX -N LIBVIRT_INP -N LIBVIRT_OUT -A INPUT -j LIBVIRT_INP -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWX -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWI -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWO -A OUTPUT -j LIBVIRT_OUT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.0.0/24 -o virbr0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.1.0/24 -o virbr1 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.0.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.1.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT While in the nat table: -N LIBVIRT_PRT -A POSTROUTING -j LIBVIRT_PRT -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/24 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 255.255.255.255/32 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.0.0/24 ! -d 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 224.0.0.0/24 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 255.255.255.255/32 -j RETURN -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A LIBVIRT_PRT -s 192.168.1.0/24 ! -d 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE And finally the mangle table: -N LIBVIRT_PRT -A POSTROUTING -j LIBVIRT_PRT -A LIBVIRT_PRT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill -A LIBVIRT_PRT -o virbr1 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
2018-12-05 15:53:55 +00:00
iptablesSetDeletePrivate(true);
}
/* XXX: This function can be a lot more exhaustive, there are certainly
* other scenarios where we can ruin host network connectivity.
* XXX: Using a proper library is preferred over parsing /proc
*/
int networkCheckRouteCollision(virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
int ret = 0, len;
char *cur, *buf = NULL;
/* allow for up to 100000 routes (each line is 128 bytes) */
enum {MAX_ROUTE_SIZE = 128*100000};
/* Read whole routing table into memory */
if ((len = virFileReadAll(PROC_NET_ROUTE, MAX_ROUTE_SIZE, &buf)) < 0)
goto out;
/* Dropping the last character shouldn't hurt */
if (len > 0)
buf[len-1] = '\0';
VIR_DEBUG("%s output:\n%s", PROC_NET_ROUTE, buf);
if (!STRPREFIX(buf, "Iface"))
goto out;
/* First line is just headings, skip it */
cur = strchr(buf, '\n');
if (cur)
cur++;
while (cur) {
char iface[17], dest[128], mask[128];
unsigned int addr_val, mask_val;
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef;
virNetDevIPRoutePtr routedef;
int num;
size_t i;
/* NUL-terminate the line, so sscanf doesn't go beyond a newline. */
char *nl = strchr(cur, '\n');
if (nl)
*nl++ = '\0';
num = sscanf(cur, "%16s %127s %*s %*s %*s %*s %*s %127s",
iface, dest, mask);
cur = nl;
if (num != 3) {
VIR_DEBUG("Failed to parse %s", PROC_NET_ROUTE);
continue;
}
if (virStrToLong_ui(dest, NULL, 16, &addr_val) < 0) {
VIR_DEBUG("Failed to convert network address %s to uint", dest);
continue;
}
if (virStrToLong_ui(mask, NULL, 16, &mask_val) < 0) {
VIR_DEBUG("Failed to convert network mask %s to uint", mask);
continue;
}
addr_val &= mask_val;
for (i = 0;
(ipdef = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET, i));
i++) {
unsigned int net_dest;
virSocketAddr netmask;
if (virNetworkIPDefNetmask(ipdef, &netmask) < 0) {
VIR_WARN("Failed to get netmask of '%s'",
def->bridge);
continue;
}
net_dest = (ipdef->address.data.inet4.sin_addr.s_addr &
netmask.data.inet4.sin_addr.s_addr);
if ((net_dest == addr_val) &&
(netmask.data.inet4.sin_addr.s_addr == mask_val)) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
_("Network is already in use by interface %s"),
iface);
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
}
for (i = 0;
(routedef = virNetworkDefGetRouteByIndex(def, AF_INET, i));
i++) {
virSocketAddr r_mask, r_addr;
virSocketAddrPtr tmp_addr = virNetDevIPRouteGetAddress(routedef);
int r_prefix = virNetDevIPRouteGetPrefix(routedef);
if (!tmp_addr ||
virSocketAddrMaskByPrefix(tmp_addr, r_prefix, &r_addr) < 0 ||
virSocketAddrPrefixToNetmask(r_prefix, &r_mask, AF_INET) < 0)
continue;
if ((r_addr.data.inet4.sin_addr.s_addr == addr_val) &&
(r_mask.data.inet4.sin_addr.s_addr == mask_val)) {
char *addr_str = virSocketAddrFormat(&r_addr);
if (!addr_str)
virResetLastError();
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
_("Route address '%s' conflicts "
"with IP address for '%s'"),
NULLSTR(addr_str), iface);
VIR_FREE(addr_str);
ret = -1;
goto out;
}
}
}
out:
VIR_FREE(buf);
return ret;
}
static const char networkLocalMulticast[] = "224.0.0.0/24";
static const char networkLocalBroadcast[] = "255.255.255.255/32";
static int
networkAddMasqueradingFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def,
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef)
{
int prefix = virNetworkIPDefPrefix(ipdef);
const char *forwardIf = virNetworkDefForwardIf(def, 0);
if (prefix < 0) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
_("Invalid prefix or netmask for '%s'"),
def->bridge);
return -1;
}
/* allow forwarding packets from the bridge interface */
if (iptablesAddForwardAllowOut(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
/* allow forwarding packets to the bridge interface if they are
* part of an existing connection
*/
if (iptablesAddForwardAllowRelatedIn(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
/*
* Enable masquerading.
*
* We need to end up with 5 rules in the table in this order
*
* 1. do not masquerade packets targeting 224.0.0.0/24
* 2. do not masquerade packets targeting 255.255.255.255/32
* 3. masquerade protocol=tcp with sport mapping restriction
* 4. masquerade protocol=udp with sport mapping restriction
* 5. generic, masquerade any protocol
*
* 224.0.0.0/24 is the local network multicast range. Packets are not
* forwarded outside.
*
* 255.255.255.255/32 is the broadcast address of any local network. Again,
* such packets are never forwarded, but strict DHCP clients don't accept
* DHCP replies with changed source ports.
*
* The sport mappings are required, because default IPtables
* MASQUERADE maintain port numbers unchanged where possible.
*
* NFS can be configured to only "trust" port numbers < 1023.
*
* Guests using NAT thus need to be prevented from having port
* numbers < 1023, otherwise they can bypass the NFS "security"
* check on the source port number.
*
* Since we use '--insert' to add rules to the header of the
* chain, we actually need to add them in the reverse of the
* order just mentioned !
*/
/* First the generic masquerade rule for other protocols */
if (iptablesAddForwardMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
&def->forward.addr,
&def->forward.port,
NULL) < 0)
return -1;
/* UDP with a source port restriction */
if (iptablesAddForwardMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
&def->forward.addr,
&def->forward.port,
"udp") < 0)
return -1;
/* TCP with a source port restriction */
if (iptablesAddForwardMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
&def->forward.addr,
&def->forward.port,
"tcp") < 0)
return -1;
/* exempt local network broadcast address as destination */
if (iptablesAddDontMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
networkLocalBroadcast) < 0)
return -1;
/* exempt local multicast range as destination */
if (iptablesAddDontMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
networkLocalMulticast) < 0)
return -1;
return 0;
}
static int
networkRemoveMasqueradingFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def,
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef)
{
int prefix = virNetworkIPDefPrefix(ipdef);
const char *forwardIf = virNetworkDefForwardIf(def, 0);
if (prefix < 0)
return 0;
if (iptablesRemoveDontMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
networkLocalMulticast) < 0)
return -1;
if (iptablesRemoveDontMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
networkLocalBroadcast) < 0)
return -1;
if (iptablesRemoveForwardMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
&def->forward.addr,
&def->forward.port,
"tcp") < 0)
return -1;
if (iptablesRemoveForwardMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
&def->forward.addr,
&def->forward.port,
"udp") < 0)
return -1;
if (iptablesRemoveForwardMasquerade(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
forwardIf,
&def->forward.addr,
&def->forward.port,
NULL) < 0)
return -1;
if (iptablesRemoveForwardAllowRelatedIn(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
if (iptablesRemoveForwardAllowOut(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
return 0;
}
static int
networkAddRoutingFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def,
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef)
{
int prefix = virNetworkIPDefPrefix(ipdef);
const char *forwardIf = virNetworkDefForwardIf(def, 0);
if (prefix < 0) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
_("Invalid prefix or netmask for '%s'"),
def->bridge);
return -1;
}
/* allow routing packets from the bridge interface */
if (iptablesAddForwardAllowOut(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
/* allow routing packets to the bridge interface */
if (iptablesAddForwardAllowIn(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
return 0;
}
static int
networkRemoveRoutingFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def,
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef)
{
int prefix = virNetworkIPDefPrefix(ipdef);
const char *forwardIf = virNetworkDefForwardIf(def, 0);
if (prefix < 0)
return 0;
if (iptablesRemoveForwardAllowIn(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
if (iptablesRemoveForwardAllowOut(fw,
&ipdef->address,
prefix,
def->bridge,
forwardIf) < 0)
return -1;
return 0;
}
static void
networkAddGeneralIPv4FirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
size_t i;
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipv4def;
/* First look for first IPv4 address that has dhcp or tftpboot defined. */
/* We support dhcp config on 1 IPv4 interface only. */
for (i = 0;
(ipv4def = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET, i));
i++) {
if (ipv4def->nranges || ipv4def->nhosts || ipv4def->tftproot)
break;
}
/* allow DHCP requests through to dnsmasq */
iptablesAddTcpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 67);
iptablesAddUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 67);
iptablesAddUdpOutput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 68);
/* allow DNS requests through to dnsmasq */
iptablesAddTcpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 53);
iptablesAddUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 53);
/* allow TFTP requests through to dnsmasq if necessary */
if (ipv4def && ipv4def->tftproot)
iptablesAddUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 69);
/* Catch all rules to block forwarding to/from bridges */
iptablesAddForwardRejectOut(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge);
iptablesAddForwardRejectIn(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge);
/* Allow traffic between guests on the same bridge */
iptablesAddForwardAllowCross(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge);
}
static void
networkRemoveGeneralIPv4FirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
size_t i;
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipv4def;
for (i = 0;
(ipv4def = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET, i));
i++) {
if (ipv4def->nranges || ipv4def->nhosts || ipv4def->tftproot)
break;
}
iptablesRemoveForwardAllowCross(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge);
iptablesRemoveForwardRejectIn(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge);
iptablesRemoveForwardRejectOut(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge);
if (ipv4def && ipv4def->tftproot)
iptablesRemoveUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 69);
iptablesRemoveUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 53);
iptablesRemoveTcpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 53);
iptablesRemoveUdpOutput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 68);
iptablesRemoveUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 67);
iptablesRemoveTcpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV4, def->bridge, 67);
}
/* Add all once/network rules required for IPv6.
* If no IPv6 addresses are defined and <network ipv6='yes'> is
* specified, then allow IPv6 communications between virtual systems.
* If any IPv6 addresses are defined, then add the rules for regular operation.
*/
static void
networkAddGeneralIPv6FirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
if (!virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET6, 0) &&
!def->ipv6nogw) {
return;
}
/* Catch all rules to block forwarding to/from bridges */
iptablesAddForwardRejectOut(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge);
iptablesAddForwardRejectIn(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge);
/* Allow traffic between guests on the same bridge */
iptablesAddForwardAllowCross(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge);
if (virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET6, 0)) {
/* allow DNS over IPv6 */
iptablesAddTcpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge, 53);
iptablesAddUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge, 53);
iptablesAddUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge, 547);
}
}
static void
networkRemoveGeneralIPv6FirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
if (!virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET6, 0) &&
!def->ipv6nogw) {
return;
}
if (virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET6, 0)) {
iptablesRemoveUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge, 547);
iptablesRemoveUdpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge, 53);
iptablesRemoveTcpInput(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge, 53);
}
/* the following rules are there if no IPv6 address has been defined
* but def->ipv6nogw == true
*/
iptablesRemoveForwardAllowCross(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge);
iptablesRemoveForwardRejectIn(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge);
iptablesRemoveForwardRejectOut(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_LAYER_IPV6, def->bridge);
}
static void
networkAddGeneralFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
networkAddGeneralIPv4FirewallRules(fw, def);
networkAddGeneralIPv6FirewallRules(fw, def);
}
static void
networkRemoveGeneralFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
networkRemoveGeneralIPv4FirewallRules(fw, def);
networkRemoveGeneralIPv6FirewallRules(fw, def);
}
static void
networkAddChecksumFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
size_t i;
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipv4def;
/* First look for first IPv4 address that has dhcp or tftpboot defined. */
/* We support dhcp config on 1 IPv4 interface only. */
for (i = 0;
(ipv4def = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET, i));
i++) {
if (ipv4def->nranges || ipv4def->nhosts)
break;
}
/* If we are doing local DHCP service on this network, attempt to
* add a rule that will fixup the checksum of DHCP response
* packets back to the guests (but report failure without
* aborting, since not all iptables implementations support it).
*/
if (ipv4def)
iptablesAddOutputFixUdpChecksum(fw, def->bridge, 68);
}
static void
networkRemoveChecksumFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
size_t i;
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipv4def;
/* First look for first IPv4 address that has dhcp or tftpboot defined. */
/* We support dhcp config on 1 IPv4 interface only. */
for (i = 0;
(ipv4def = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_INET, i));
i++) {
if (ipv4def->nranges || ipv4def->nhosts)
break;
}
if (ipv4def)
iptablesRemoveOutputFixUdpChecksum(fw, def->bridge, 68);
}
static int
networkAddIPSpecificFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def,
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef)
{
/* NB: in the case of IPv6, routing rules are added when the
* forward mode is NAT. This is because IPv6 has no NAT.
*/
if (def->forward.type == VIR_NETWORK_FORWARD_NAT) {
if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_IS_FAMILY(&ipdef->address, AF_INET))
return networkAddMasqueradingFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef);
else if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_IS_FAMILY(&ipdef->address, AF_INET6))
return networkAddRoutingFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef);
} else if (def->forward.type == VIR_NETWORK_FORWARD_ROUTE) {
return networkAddRoutingFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef);
}
return 0;
}
static int
networkRemoveIPSpecificFirewallRules(virFirewallPtr fw,
virNetworkDefPtr def,
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef)
{
if (def->forward.type == VIR_NETWORK_FORWARD_NAT) {
if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_IS_FAMILY(&ipdef->address, AF_INET))
return networkRemoveMasqueradingFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef);
else if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_IS_FAMILY(&ipdef->address, AF_INET6))
return networkRemoveRoutingFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef);
} else if (def->forward.type == VIR_NETWORK_FORWARD_ROUTE) {
return networkRemoveRoutingFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef);
}
return 0;
}
/* Add all rules for all ip addresses (and general rules) on a network */
int networkAddFirewallRules(virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
size_t i;
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef;
virFirewallPtr fw = NULL;
int ret = -1;
network: set firewalld zone of bridges to "libvirt" zone when appropriate This patch restores broken guest network connectivity after a host firewalld is switched to using an nftables backend. It does this by adding libvirt networks' bridge interfaces to the new "libvirt" zone in firewalld. After this patch, the bridge interface of any network created by libvirt (when firewalld is active) will be added to the firewalld zone called "libvirt" if it exists (regardless of the firewalld backend setting). This behavior does *not* depend on whether or not libvirt has installed the libvirt zone file (set with "--with[out]-firewalld-zone" during the configure phase of the package build). If the libvirt zone doesn't exist (either because the package was configured to not install it, or possibly it was installed, but firewalld doesn't support rule priorities, resulting in a parse error), the bridge will remain in firewalld's default zone, which could be innocuous (in the case that the firewalld backend is iptables, guest networking will still function properly with the bridge in the default zone), or it could be disastrous (if the firewalld backend is nftables, we can be assured that guest networking will fail). In order to be unobtrusive in the former case, and informative in the latter, when the libvirt zone doesn't exist we then check the firewalld version to see if it's new enough to support the nftables backend, and then if the backend is actually set to nftables, before logging an error (and failing the net-start operation, since the network couldn't possibly work anyway). When the libvirt zone is used, network behavior is *slightly* different from behavior of previous libvirt. In the past, libvirt network behavior would be affected by the configuration of firewalld's default zone (usually "public"), but now it is affected only by the "libvirt" zone), and thus almost surely warrants a release note for any distro upgrading to libvirt 5.1 or above. Although it's unfortunate that we have to deal with a mandatory behavior change, the architecture of multiple hooks makes it impossible to *not* change behavior in some way, and the new behavior is arguably better (since it will now be possible to manage access to the host from virtual machines vs from public interfaces separately). Creates-and-Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1650320 Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1638342 Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@laine.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
2018-10-16 00:31:02 +00:00
/* if firewalld is active, try to set the "libvirt" zone. This is
* desirable (for consistency) if firewalld is using the iptables
* backend, but is necessary (for basic network connectivity) if
* firewalld is using the nftables backend
*/
if (virFirewallDIsRegistered() == 0) {
/* if the "libvirt" zone exists, then set it. If not, and
* if firewalld is using the nftables backend, then we
* need to log an error because the combination of
* nftables + default zone means that traffic cannot be
* forwarded (and even DHCP and DNS from guest to host
* will probably no be permitted by the default zone
*/
if (virFirewallDZoneExists("libvirt")) {
if (virFirewallDInterfaceSetZone(def->bridge, "libvirt") < 0)
goto cleanup;
} else {
unsigned long version;
int vresult = virFirewallDGetVersion(&version);
if (vresult < 0)
goto cleanup;
/* Support for nftables backend was added in firewalld
* 0.6.0. Support for rule priorities (required by the
* 'libvirt' zone, which should be installed by a
* libvirt package, *not* by firewalld) was not added
* until firewalld 0.7.0 (unless it was backported).
*/
if (version >= 6000 &&
virFirewallDGetBackend() == VIR_FIREWALLD_BACKEND_NFTABLES) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
_("firewalld is set to use the nftables "
"backend, but the required firewalld "
"'libvirt' zone is missing. Either set "
"the firewalld backend to 'iptables', or "
"ensure that firewalld has a 'libvirt' "
"zone by upgrading firewalld to a "
"version supporting rule priorities "
"(0.7.0+) and/or rebuilding "
"libvirt with --with-firewalld-zone"));
goto cleanup;
}
}
}
fw = virFirewallNew();
virFirewallStartTransaction(fw, 0);
networkAddGeneralFirewallRules(fw, def);
for (i = 0;
(ipdef = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_UNSPEC, i));
i++) {
if (networkAddIPSpecificFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
virFirewallStartRollback(fw, 0);
for (i = 0;
(ipdef = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_UNSPEC, i));
i++) {
if (networkRemoveIPSpecificFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
networkRemoveGeneralFirewallRules(fw, def);
virFirewallStartTransaction(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_TRANSACTION_IGNORE_ERRORS);
networkAddChecksumFirewallRules(fw, def);
if (virFirewallApply(fw) < 0)
goto cleanup;
ret = 0;
cleanup:
virFirewallFree(fw);
return ret;
}
/* Remove all rules for all ip addresses (and general rules) on a network */
void networkRemoveFirewallRules(virNetworkDefPtr def)
{
size_t i;
virNetworkIPDefPtr ipdef;
virFirewallPtr fw = NULL;
fw = virFirewallNew();
virFirewallStartTransaction(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_TRANSACTION_IGNORE_ERRORS);
networkRemoveChecksumFirewallRules(fw, def);
virFirewallStartTransaction(fw, VIR_FIREWALL_TRANSACTION_IGNORE_ERRORS);
for (i = 0;
(ipdef = virNetworkDefGetIPByIndex(def, AF_UNSPEC, i));
i++) {
if (networkRemoveIPSpecificFirewallRules(fw, def, ipdef) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
networkRemoveGeneralFirewallRules(fw, def);
virFirewallApply(fw);
cleanup:
virFirewallFree(fw);
}