External/libvirt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt.git synced 2024-11-04 20:31:13 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
d0819b9f02
libvirt/tests/domainbackupxml2xmlin/backup-pull.xml

23 lines
723 B
XML
Raw Normal View History

backup: Document new XML for backups Prepare for new backup APIs by describing the XML that will represent a backup. The XML resembles snapshots and checkpoints in being able to select actions for a set of disks, but has other differences. It can support both push model (the hypervisor does the backup directly into the destination file) and pull model (the hypervisor exposes an access port for a third party to grab what is necessary). Add testsuite coverage for some minimal uses of the XML. The <disk> element within <domainbackup> tries to model the same elements as a <disk> under <domain>, but sharing the RNG grammar proved to be hairy. That is in part because while <domain> use <source> to describe a host resource in use by the guest, a backup job is using a host resource that is not visible to the guest: a push backup action is instead describing a <target> (which ultimately could be a remote network resource, but for simplicity the RNG just validates a local file for now), and a pull backup action is instead describing a temporary local file <scratch> (which probably should not be a remote resource). A future refactoring may thus introduce some way to parameterize RNG to accept <disk type='FOO'>...</disk> so that the name of the subelement can be <source> for domain, or <target> or <scratch> as needed for backups. Future patches may improve this area of code. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
2019-08-22 01:42:41 +00:00
<domainbackup mode="pull">
<incremental>1525889631</incremental>
<server transport='tcp' name='localhost' port='10809'/>
<disks>
<disk name='vda' type='file'>
<scratch file='/path/to/file'/>
</disk>
<disk name='hda' backup='no'/>
backup: Allow configuring incremental backup per-disk individually The semantics of the backup operation don't strictly require that all disks being backed up are part of the same incremental part (when a disk was checkpointed/backed up separately or in a different VM), or even they may not have a previous checkpoint at all (e.g. when the disk was freshly hotplugged to the vm). In such cases we can still create a common checkpoint for all of them and backup differences according to configuration. This patch adds a per-disk configuration of the checkpoint to do the incremental backup from via the 'incremental' attribute and allows perform full backups via the 'backupmode' attribute. Note that no changes to the qemu driver are necessary to take advantage of this as we already obey the per-disk 'incremental' field. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829829 Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
2020-06-25 14:16:14 +00:00
<disk name='vdc' type='file' backupmode='full'>
<scratch file='/path/to/file'/>
</disk>
<disk name='vdd' type='file' backupmode='incremental'>
<scratch file='/path/to/file'/>
</disk>
<disk name='vde' type='file' backupmode='incremental' incremental='blah'>
<scratch file='/path/to/file'/>
</disk>
<disk name='vdf' type='file' incremental='bleh'>
<scratch file='/path/to/file'/>
</disk>
backup: Document new XML for backups Prepare for new backup APIs by describing the XML that will represent a backup. The XML resembles snapshots and checkpoints in being able to select actions for a set of disks, but has other differences. It can support both push model (the hypervisor does the backup directly into the destination file) and pull model (the hypervisor exposes an access port for a third party to grab what is necessary). Add testsuite coverage for some minimal uses of the XML. The <disk> element within <domainbackup> tries to model the same elements as a <disk> under <domain>, but sharing the RNG grammar proved to be hairy. That is in part because while <domain> use <source> to describe a host resource in use by the guest, a backup job is using a host resource that is not visible to the guest: a push backup action is instead describing a <target> (which ultimately could be a remote network resource, but for simplicity the RNG just validates a local file for now), and a pull backup action is instead describing a temporary local file <scratch> (which probably should not be a remote resource). A future refactoring may thus introduce some way to parameterize RNG to accept <disk type='FOO'>...</disk> so that the name of the subelement can be <source> for domain, or <target> or <scratch> as needed for backups. Future patches may improve this area of code. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
2019-08-22 01:42:41 +00:00
</disks>
</domainbackup>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink