From 1732c1c62997b9f5ce39e5eb4d1ef2f842af73e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix parsing of SELinux ranges without a category Normally libvirtd should run with a SELinux label system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 If a user manually runs libvirtd though, it is sometimes possible to get into a situation where it is running system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 The SELinux security driver isn't expecting this and can't parse the security label since it lacks the ':c0.c1023' part causing it to complain internal error Cannot parse sensitivity level in s0 This updates the parser to cope with this, so if no category is present, libvirtd will hardcode the equivalent of c0.c1023. Now this won't work if SELinux is in Enforcing mode, but that's not an issue, because the user can only get into this problem if in Permissive mode. This means they can now start VMs in Permissive mode without hitting that parsing error Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange --- src/security/security_selinux.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- tests/securityselinuxtest.c | 12 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c index 2d534a759f..e775544013 100644 --- a/src/security/security_selinux.c +++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c @@ -159,6 +159,20 @@ virSecuritySELinuxMCSFind(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr, return mcs; } + +/* + * This needs to cope with several styles of range + * + * system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0 + * system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0 + * system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 + * + * In the first two cases, we'll assume c0.c1023 for + * the category part, since that's what we're really + * interested in. This won't work in Enforcing mode, + * but will prevent libvirtd breaking in Permissive + * mode when run with a wierd process label. + */ static int virSecuritySELinuxMCSGetProcessRange(char **sens, int *catMin, @@ -166,7 +180,8 @@ virSecuritySELinuxMCSGetProcessRange(char **sens, { security_context_t ourSecContext = NULL; context_t ourContext = NULL; - char *cat, *tmp; + char *cat = NULL; + char *tmp; int ret = -1; if (getcon_raw(&ourSecContext) < 0) { @@ -186,20 +201,25 @@ virSecuritySELinuxMCSGetProcessRange(char **sens, goto cleanup; } - /* Find and blank out the category part */ - if (!(tmp = strchr(*sens, ':'))) { - virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, - _("Cannot parse sensitivity level in %s"), - *sens); - goto cleanup; + /* Find and blank out the category part (if any) */ + tmp = strchr(*sens, ':'); + if (tmp) { + *tmp = '\0'; + cat = tmp + 1; } - *tmp = '\0'; - cat = tmp + 1; /* Find and blank out the sensitivity upper bound */ if ((tmp = strchr(*sens, '-'))) *tmp = '\0'; /* sens now just contains the sensitivity lower bound */ + /* If there was no category part, just assume c0.c1024 */ + if (!cat) { + *catMin = 0; + *catMax = 1024; + ret = 0; + goto cleanup; + } + /* Find & extract category min */ tmp = cat; if (tmp[0] != 'c') { diff --git a/tests/securityselinuxtest.c b/tests/securityselinuxtest.c index ba00010490..da8a12f3d7 100644 --- a/tests/securityselinuxtest.c +++ b/tests/securityselinuxtest.c @@ -296,6 +296,18 @@ mymain(void) ret = -1; \ } while (0) + DO_TEST_GEN_LABEL("dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023", + "unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0", + true, NULL, NULL, + "unconfined_u", "unconfined_r", "object_r", + "svirt_t", "svirt_image_t", + 0, 0, 0, 1023); + DO_TEST_GEN_LABEL("dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023", + "unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0", + true, NULL, NULL, + "unconfined_u", "unconfined_r", "object_r", + "svirt_t", "svirt_image_t", + 0, 0, 0, 1023); DO_TEST_GEN_LABEL("dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023", "unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023", true, NULL, NULL,