From 6730e6352f6264ecbcadba8d778d8fd87f79bb9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Blake Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:02:02 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] spec: prefer canonical name of util-linux I noticed that in two places, we require util-linux, and in a third, we require util-linux-ng. On Fedora (I tested F15 through rawhide), util-linux-ng is obsoleted by util-linux; on RHEL 6, util-linux is obsoleted by util-linux-ng. That is, on either platform, either name will get you the correct package installed (where the preferred name on fedora is util-linux, and on RHEL 6 is util-linux-ng). But on RHEL 5, there is no util-linux-ng * libvirt.spec.in (Requires): Use util-linux, not util-linux-ng. (cherry picked from commit a9087ad16dc23fc57de16017e05e85e26cf9813d) --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 11e31991df..e3d0a2d48a 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ Requires: PolicyKit >= 0.6 %if %{with_storage_fs} Requires: nfs-utils # For mkfs -Requires: util-linux-ng +Requires: util-linux # For pool-build probing for existing pools BuildRequires: libblkid-devel >= 2.17 # For glusterfs