qemu: Resolve Coverity DEADCODE.

reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-November/msg00327.html

I could have just remove bool supportMaxOptions variable, but
if I had do this, we could not check anymore if the nparams variable is
superior to QEMU_NB_BLOCK_IO_TUNE_PARAM_MAX.

v2: change following this proposal:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-November/msg00379.html
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Gatto 2014-11-12 16:53:01 +01:00 committed by John Ferlan
parent 5fb007b035
commit 6c1347ec06

View File

@ -17003,14 +17003,16 @@ qemuDomainGetBlockIoTune(virDomainPtr dom,
&persistentDef) < 0)
goto endjob;
if (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE) {
/* If the VM is running, we can check if the current VM can use
* optional parameters or not. We didn't made this check sooner
* because we need vm->privateData which need
* virDomainLiveConfigHelperMethod to do so. */
priv = vm->privateData;
supportMaxOptions = virQEMUCapsGet(priv->qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DRIVE_IOTUNE_MAX);
}
if ((*nparams) == 0) {
if (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE) {
priv = vm->privateData;
/* If the VM is running, we can check if the current VM can use
* optional parameters or not. We didn't made this check sooner
* because we need the VM data to do so. */
supportMaxOptions = virQEMUCapsGet(priv->qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DRIVE_IOTUNE_MAX);
}
*nparams = supportMaxOptions ?
QEMU_NB_BLOCK_IO_TUNE_PARAM_MAX : QEMU_NB_BLOCK_IO_TUNE_PARAM;
ret = 0;
@ -17023,7 +17025,6 @@ qemuDomainGetBlockIoTune(virDomainPtr dom,
}
if (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE) {
priv = vm->privateData;
qemuDomainObjEnterMonitor(driver, vm);
ret = qemuMonitorGetBlockIoThrottle(priv->mon, device, &reply, supportMaxOptions);
qemuDomainObjExitMonitor(driver, vm);