mirror of
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt.git
synced 2024-12-22 13:45:38 +00:00
qemu_domain.c: NUMA CPUs auto-fill for incomplete topologies
Libvirt allows the user to define an incomplete NUMA topology, where the sum of all CPUs in each cell is less than the total of VCPUs. What ends up happening is that QEMU allocates the non-enumerated CPUs in the first NUMA node. This behavior is being flagged as 'to be deprecated' at least since QEMU commit ec78f8114bc4 ("numa: use possible_cpus for not mapped CPUs check"). In [1], Maxiwell suggested that we forbid the user to define such topologies. In his review [2], Peter Krempa pointed out that we can't break existing guests, and suggested that Libvirt should emulate the QEMU behavior of putting the remaining vCPUs in the first NUMA node in these cases. This patch implements Peter Krempa's suggestion. Since we're going to most likely end up with disjointed NUMA configuration in node 0 after the auto-fill, we're making auto-fill dependent on QEMU_CAPS_NUMA. A following patch will update the documentation not just to inform about the auto-fill mechanic with incomplete NUMA topologies, but also to discourage the user to create such topologies in the future. This approach also makes Libvirt independent of whether QEMU changes its current behavior since we're either auto-filling the CPUs in node 0 or the user (hopefully) is aware that incomplete topologies, although supported in Libvirt, are to be avoided. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-June/msg00224.html [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-June/msg00263.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
711a868861
commit
baca59a538
@ -4963,6 +4963,50 @@ qemuDomainDefTsegPostParse(virDomainDefPtr def,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* qemuDomainDefNumaCPUsRectify:
|
||||
* @numa: pointer to numa definition
|
||||
* @maxCpus: number of CPUs this numa is supposed to have
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function emulates the (to be deprecated) behavior of filling
|
||||
* up in node0 with the remaining CPUs, in case of an incomplete NUMA
|
||||
* setup, up to getVcpusMax.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
qemuDomainDefNumaCPUsRectify(virDomainDefPtr def, virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int vcpusMax, numacpus;
|
||||
|
||||
/* QEMU_CAPS_NUMA tells us if QEMU is able to handle disjointed
|
||||
* NUMA CPU ranges. The filling process will create a disjointed
|
||||
* setup in node0 most of the time. Do not proceed if QEMU
|
||||
* can't handle it.*/
|
||||
if (virDomainNumaGetNodeCount(def->numa) == 0 ||
|
||||
!virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_NUMA))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
vcpusMax = virDomainDefGetVcpusMax(def);
|
||||
numacpus = virDomainNumaGetCPUCountTotal(def->numa);
|
||||
|
||||
if (numacpus < vcpusMax) {
|
||||
if (virDomainNumaFillCPUsInNode(def->numa, 0, vcpusMax) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
qemuDomainDefNumaCPUsPostParse(virDomainDefPtr def,
|
||||
virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return qemuDomainDefNumaCPUsRectify(def, qemuCaps);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
qemuDomainDefPostParseBasic(virDomainDefPtr def,
|
||||
void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
|
||||
@ -5049,6 +5093,9 @@ qemuDomainDefPostParse(virDomainDefPtr def,
|
||||
if (qemuDomainDefTsegPostParse(def, qemuCaps) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (qemuDomainDefNumaCPUsPostParse(def, qemuCaps) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1297,3 +1297,7 @@ qemuDomainInitializePflashStorageSource(virDomainObjPtr vm);
|
||||
bool
|
||||
qemuDomainDiskBlockJobIsSupported(virDomainObjPtr vm,
|
||||
virDomainDiskDefPtr disk);
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
qemuDomainDefNumaCPUsRectify(virDomainDefPtr def,
|
||||
virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps);
|
||||
|
@ -4994,11 +4994,13 @@ qemuDomainSetVcpusAgent(virDomainObjPtr vm,
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
qemuDomainSetVcpusMax(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
|
||||
virDomainObjPtr vm,
|
||||
virDomainDefPtr def,
|
||||
virDomainDefPtr persistentDef,
|
||||
unsigned int nvcpus)
|
||||
{
|
||||
g_autoptr(virQEMUDriverConfig) cfg = virQEMUDriverGetConfig(driver);
|
||||
qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = vm->privateData;
|
||||
unsigned int topologycpus;
|
||||
|
||||
if (def) {
|
||||
@ -5029,6 +5031,9 @@ qemuDomainSetVcpusMax(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
|
||||
if (virDomainDefSetVcpusMax(persistentDef, nvcpus, driver->xmlopt) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (qemuDomainDefNumaCPUsRectify(persistentDef, priv->qemuCaps) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (virDomainDefSave(persistentDef, driver->xmlopt, cfg->configDir) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5076,7 +5081,7 @@ qemuDomainSetVcpusFlags(virDomainPtr dom,
|
||||
if (useAgent)
|
||||
ret = qemuDomainSetVcpusAgent(vm, nvcpus);
|
||||
else if (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_MAXIMUM)
|
||||
ret = qemuDomainSetVcpusMax(driver, def, persistentDef, nvcpus);
|
||||
ret = qemuDomainSetVcpusMax(driver, vm, def, persistentDef, nvcpus);
|
||||
else
|
||||
ret = qemuDomainSetVcpusInternal(driver, vm, def, persistentDef,
|
||||
nvcpus, hotpluggable);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user