mirror of
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt.git
synced 2025-03-07 17:28:15 +00:00
conf: fix populating of fake NUMA in multi-node hosts
If the host OS doesn't have NUMA present, we fallback to populating fake NUMA info and the code thus assumes only a single NUMA node. Unfortunately we also fallback to fake NUMA if numactl-devel was not present, and in this case we can still have multiple NUMA nodes. In this case we create all CPUs, but only the CPUs in the first node have any data filled in, resulting in capabilities like: <topology> <cells num='1'> <cell id='0'> <memory unit='KiB'>15977572</memory> <cpus num='48'> <cpu id='0' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='0'/> <cpu id='1' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='1'/> <cpu id='2' socket_id='0' core_id='1' siblings='2'/> <cpu id='3' socket_id='0' core_id='1' siblings='3'/> <cpu id='4' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='4'/> <cpu id='5' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='5'/> <cpu id='6' socket_id='0' core_id='3' siblings='6'/> <cpu id='7' socket_id='0' core_id='3' siblings='7'/> <cpu id='8' socket_id='0' core_id='4' siblings='8'/> <cpu id='9' socket_id='0' core_id='4' siblings='9'/> <cpu id='10' socket_id='0' core_id='5' siblings='10'/> <cpu id='11' socket_id='0' core_id='5' siblings='11'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> <cpu id='0'/> </cpus> </cell> </cells> </topology> With this new code we get something slightly less broken <topology> <cells num='4'> <cell id='0'> <memory unit='KiB'>15977572</memory> <cpus num='12'> <cpu id='0' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='0-1'/> <cpu id='1' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='0-1'/> <cpu id='2' socket_id='0' core_id='1' siblings='2-3'/> <cpu id='3' socket_id='0' core_id='1' siblings='2-3'/> <cpu id='4' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='4-5'/> <cpu id='5' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='4-5'/> <cpu id='6' socket_id='0' core_id='3' siblings='6-7'/> <cpu id='7' socket_id='0' core_id='3' siblings='6-7'/> <cpu id='8' socket_id='0' core_id='4' siblings='8-9'/> <cpu id='9' socket_id='0' core_id='4' siblings='8-9'/> <cpu id='10' socket_id='0' core_id='5' siblings='10-11'/> <cpu id='11' socket_id='0' core_id='5' siblings='10-11'/> </cpus> </cell> <cell id='0'> <memory unit='KiB'>15977572</memory> <cpus num='12'> <cpu id='12' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='12-13'/> <cpu id='13' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='12-13'/> <cpu id='14' socket_id='0' core_id='1' siblings='14-15'/> <cpu id='15' socket_id='0' core_id='1' siblings='14-15'/> <cpu id='16' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='16-17'/> <cpu id='17' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='16-17'/> <cpu id='18' socket_id='0' core_id='3' siblings='18-19'/> <cpu id='19' socket_id='0' core_id='3' siblings='18-19'/> <cpu id='20' socket_id='0' core_id='4' siblings='20-21'/> <cpu id='21' socket_id='0' core_id='4' siblings='20-21'/> <cpu id='22' socket_id='0' core_id='5' siblings='22-23'/> <cpu id='23' socket_id='0' core_id='5' siblings='22-23'/> </cpus> </cell> </cells> </topology> The topology at least now reflects what 'virsh nodeinfo' reports. The main bug is that the CPU "id" values won't match what the Linux host actually uses. Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fb5aaf3d05
commit
e67ccd3cf8
@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ virCapabilitiesHostNUMAInitFake(virCapsHostNUMAPtr caps)
|
||||
virNodeInfo nodeinfo;
|
||||
virCapsHostNUMACellCPUPtr cpus;
|
||||
int ncpus;
|
||||
int s, c, t;
|
||||
int n, s, c, t;
|
||||
int id, cid;
|
||||
int onlinecpus G_GNUC_UNUSED;
|
||||
bool tmp;
|
||||
@ -1605,47 +1605,52 @@ virCapabilitiesHostNUMAInitFake(virCapsHostNUMAPtr caps)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
ncpus = VIR_NODEINFO_MAXCPUS(nodeinfo);
|
||||
onlinecpus = nodeinfo.cpus;
|
||||
|
||||
if (VIR_ALLOC_N(cpus, ncpus) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
id = cid = 0;
|
||||
for (s = 0; s < nodeinfo.sockets; s++) {
|
||||
for (c = 0; c < nodeinfo.cores; c++) {
|
||||
for (t = 0; t < nodeinfo.threads; t++) {
|
||||
if (virHostCPUGetOnline(id, &tmp) < 0)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
if (tmp) {
|
||||
cpus[cid].id = id;
|
||||
cpus[cid].socket_id = s;
|
||||
cpus[cid].core_id = c;
|
||||
if (!(cpus[cid].siblings = virBitmapNew(ncpus)))
|
||||
id = 0;
|
||||
for (n = 0; n < nodeinfo.nodes; n++) {
|
||||
int nodecpus = nodeinfo.sockets * nodeinfo.cores * nodeinfo.threads;
|
||||
cid = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (VIR_ALLOC_N(cpus, nodecpus) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
for (s = 0; s < nodeinfo.sockets; s++) {
|
||||
for (c = 0; c < nodeinfo.cores; c++) {
|
||||
g_autoptr(virBitmap) siblings = virBitmapNew(ncpus);
|
||||
for (t = 0; t < nodeinfo.threads; t++)
|
||||
ignore_value(virBitmapSetBit(siblings, id + t));
|
||||
|
||||
for (t = 0; t < nodeinfo.threads; t++) {
|
||||
if (virHostCPUGetOnline(id, &tmp) < 0)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
ignore_value(virBitmapSetBit(cpus[cid].siblings, id));
|
||||
cid++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (tmp) {
|
||||
cpus[cid].id = id;
|
||||
cpus[cid].socket_id = s;
|
||||
cpus[cid].core_id = c;
|
||||
if (!(cpus[cid].siblings = virBitmapNew(ncpus)))
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
virBitmapCopy(cpus[cid].siblings, siblings);
|
||||
cid++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
id++;
|
||||
id++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virCapabilitiesHostNUMAAddCell(caps, 0,
|
||||
nodeinfo.memory,
|
||||
#ifdef __linux__
|
||||
onlinecpus, cpus,
|
||||
#else
|
||||
ncpus, cpus,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
0, NULL,
|
||||
0, NULL);
|
||||
virCapabilitiesHostNUMAAddCell(caps, 0,
|
||||
nodeinfo.memory,
|
||||
cid, cpus,
|
||||
0, NULL,
|
||||
0, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
error:
|
||||
for (; id >= 0; id--)
|
||||
virBitmapFree(cpus[id].siblings);
|
||||
for (; cid >= 0; cid--)
|
||||
virBitmapFree(cpus[cid].siblings);
|
||||
VIR_FREE(cpus);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user