From f002e9218df3afe45e97ab3642dc4d6105b7a398 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Bolte Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:42:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] datatypes: Fix outdated function names in the documentation --- src/datatypes.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/datatypes.c b/src/datatypes.c index b43a5719df..5197863094 100644 --- a/src/datatypes.c +++ b/src/datatypes.c @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ virUnrefInterface(virInterfacePtr iface) { * Lookup if the storage pool is already registered for that connection, * if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure, * and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to - * virFreeStoragePool() is needed to not leak data. + * virUnrefStoragePool() is needed to not leak data. * * Returns a pointer to the network, or NULL in case of failure */ @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ virUnrefStoragePool(virStoragePoolPtr pool) { * Lookup if the storage vol is already registered for that connection, * if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure, * and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to - * virFreeStorageVol() is needed to not leak data. + * virUnrefStorageVol() is needed to not leak data. * * Returns a pointer to the storage vol, or NULL in case of failure */ @@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ virUnrefStorageVol(virStorageVolPtr vol) { * Lookup if the device is already registered for that connection, * if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure, * and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to - * virFreeNodeDevice() is needed to not leak data. + * virUnrefNodeDevice() is needed to not leak data. * * Returns a pointer to the node device, or NULL in case of failure */ @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ virUnrefNodeDevice(virNodeDevicePtr dev) { * * Lookup if the secret is already registered for that connection, if so return * a pointer to it, otherwise allocate a new structure, and register it in the - * table. In any case a corresponding call to virFreeSecret() is needed to not + * table. In any case a corresponding call to virUnrefSecret() is needed to not * leak data. * * Returns a pointer to the secret, or NULL in case of failure