Introduce virCPUarmData to virCPUData and related
structs to cpu_arm.c for ARM cpus.
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Zheng <zheng.zhenyu@outlook.com>
Message-Id: <TY2PR01MB31130D12A95144FF88C1E32499BF0@TY2PR01MB3113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The structure is not specific to x86 and thus its cleanup function
should be defined in cpu.h and be available to all users.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
CPU models defined in the cpu_map can use signature/@stepping attribute
to match a limited set of stepping numbers. The value is a bitmap for
bits 0..15 each corresponding to a single stepping value. For example,
stepping='4-6,9' will match 4, 5, 6, and 9. Omitting the attribute is
equivalent to stepping='0-15'.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Thanks to glib allocation functions which abort on OOM the function
cannot ever return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The CPU models in our cpu_map define their signatures using separate
family and model numbers. Let's store the signatures in the same way in
our runtime representation of the cpu_map.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
It can be used for separating family, model, and stepping numbers from a
single 32b integer as reported by CPUID.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The function will be used for freeing virCPUx86Signatures structure
introduced later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Later in this series the function will work on a newly introduced
virCPUx86Signatures structure. Let's move it to the place where all
related functions will be added and rename the function as
virCPUx86SignaturesFormat for easier review of the virCPUx86Signatures
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Later in this series the function will work on a newly introduced
virCPUx86Signatures structure. Let's move it to the place were all
related functions will be added and rename the function as
virCPUx86SignaturesMatch for easier review of the virCPUx86Signatures
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Later in this series the function will work on a newly introduced
virCPUx86Signatures structure. Let's move it to the place were all
related functions will be added and rename the function as
virCPUx86SignaturesCopy for easier review of the virCPUx86Signatures
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The hint was introduced a long time ago when broken TSX implementation
was found in Haswell and Broadwell CPUs. Since then many more CPUs with
TSX were introduced and and disabled due to TAA vulnerability.
Thus the hint is not very useful and I think removing it is a better
choice then updating it to cover all current noTSX models.
This partially reverts:
commit 7f127ded65
cpu: Rework cpuCompare* APIs
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The element specifies whether a particular CPU model can be used when
creating a CPU definition from raw CPUID/MSR data. The @host attribute
determines whether the CPU model can be used (host='on') for creating
CPU definition for host capabilities. Usability of the model for domain
capabilities and host-model CPU definitions is controlled by the @guest
attribute.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
The check attribute was completely ignored for host-passthrough CPUs
even if they explicitly requested some features to be enabled. For
example, a domain with the following CPU definition
<cpu mode='host-passthrough' check='full'>
<feature policy='require' name='svm'/>
</cpu>
would happily start even when 'svm' cannot be enabled.
Let's call virCPUArchUpdateLive for host-passthrough CPUs with
VIR_CPU_CHECK_FULL to make sure the architecture specific code can
validate the provided virtual CPU against the desired definition.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515677
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Adding more checks into the existing if statements would turn them into
an unreadable mess.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The updateLive CPU sub-driver function is supposed to be called only for
a subset of CPU definitions. Let's make it more obvious by turning a
negative test and return into a positive check.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Whenever there is a guest CPU configured in domain XML, we will call
some CPU driver APIs to validate the CPU definition and check its
compatibility with the hypervisor. Thus domains with guest CPU
specification can only be started if the guest architecture is supported
by the CPU driver. But we would add a default CPU to any domain as long
as QEMU reports it causing failures to start any domain on affected
architectures.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805755
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Always trim the full specified suffix.
All of the callers outside of tests were passing either
strlen or the actual length of the string.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
The virCapabilitiesGetNodeInfo() function has the usual return
value semantics for integeres: a negative value means an error,
zero or a positive value means success. However, the function
call done in virCPUProbeHost() doesn't check for the return value
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Recently CPU hardware vendors have started to support a new structure
inside the CPU package topology known as a "die". Thus the hierarchy
is now:
sockets > dies > cores > threads
This adds support for "dies" in the XML parser, with the value
defaulting to 1 if not specified for backwards compatibility.
For example a system with 64 logical CPUs might report
<topology sockets="4" dies="2" cores="4" threads="2"/>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
bhyveargv2xmlmock calls virBhyveCapsBuild which in turn
calls virCPUProbeHost, probing the real host CPU. This
causes a test failure if the host CPU happens to contain
the 'arch-capabilities' feature as it triggers a call
to virHostCPUGetMSR() which fails on FreeBSD.
Fortunately we already have convenient code for mocking
the host CPU probing.
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>