In 600462834f we've tried to remove Author(s): lines
from comments at the beginning of our source files. Well, in some
files while we removed the "Author" line we did not remove the
actual list of authors.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Require that all headers are guarded by a symbol named
LIBVIRT_$FILENAME
where $FILENAME is the uppercased filename, with all characters
outside a-z changed into '_'.
Note we do not use a leading __ because that is technically a
namespace reserved for the toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
This introduces a syntax-check script that validates header files use a
common layout:
/*
...copyright header...
*/
<one blank line>
#ifndef SYMBOL
# define SYMBOL
....content....
#endif /* SYMBOL */
For any file ending priv.h, before the #ifndef, we will require a
guard to prevent bogus imports:
#ifndef SYMBOL_ALLOW
# error ....
#endif /* SYMBOL_ALLOW */
<one blank line>
The many mistakes this script identifies are then fixed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
In many files there are header comments that contain an Author:
statement, supposedly reflecting who originally wrote the code.
In a large collaborative project like libvirt, any non-trivial
file will have been modified by a large number of different
contributors. IOW, the Author: comments are quickly out of date,
omitting people who have made significant contribitions.
In some places Author: lines have been added despite the person
merely being responsible for creating the file by moving existing
code out of another file. IOW, the Author: lines give an incorrect
record of authorship.
With this all in mind, the comments are useless as a means to identify
who to talk to about code in a particular file. Contributors will always
be better off using 'git log' and 'git blame' if they need to find the
author of a particular bit of code.
This commit thus deletes all Author: comments from the source and adds
a rule to prevent them reappearing.
The Copyright headers are similarly misleading and inaccurate, however,
we cannot delete these as they have legal meaning, despite being largely
inaccurate. In addition only the copyright holder is permitted to change
their respective copyright statement.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Since threadpool increments the current number of threads according to current
load, i.e. how many jobs are waiting in the queue. The count however, is
constrained by max and min limits of workers. The logic of this new API works
like this:
1) setting the minimum
a) When the limit is increased, depending on the current number of
threads, new threads are possibly spawned if the current number of
threads is less than the new minimum limit
b) Decreasing the minimum limit has no possible effect on the current
number of threads
2) setting the maximum
a) Icreasing the maximum limit has no immediate effect on the current
number of threads, it only allows the threadpool to spawn more
threads when new jobs, that would otherwise end up queued, arrive.
b) Decreasing the maximum limit may affect the current number of
threads, if the current number of threads is less than the new
maximum limit. Since there may be some ongoing time-consuming jobs
that would effectively block this API from killing any threads.
Therefore, this API is asynchronous with best-effort execution,
i.e. the necessary number of workers will be terminated once they
finish their previous job, unless other workers had already
terminated, decreasing the limit to the requested value.
3) setting priority workers
- both increase and decrease in count of these workers have an
immediate impact on the current number of workers, new ones will be
spawned or some of them get terminated respectively.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
In order for the client to see all thread counts and limits, current total
and free worker count getters need to be introduced. Client might also be
interested in the job queue length, so provide a getter for that too. As with
the other getters, preparing for the admin interface, mutual exclusion is used
within all getters.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Every thread created as a worker thread within a pool gets a name
according to virThreadPoolJobFunc name.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
