Domain capabilities include information about support for various
devices and models.
Panic devices are not included in the output which means that management
applications need to include the logic for choosing the right device
model or request a default model and try defining such a domain.
Add reporting of panic device models into the domain capabilities based
on the logic in qemuValidateDomainDefPanic() and also report whether
panic devices are supported based on whether at least one model is
supported. That way consumers of the domain capability XML can
differentiate between libvirt not reporting the panic device models or
no model being supported.
Resolves: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-65187
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
When a CPU model is reported as usable='no' an additional
<blockers model='...'> element is added for that CPU model to show which
features are missing for the CPU model to become usable.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
If mgmt apps on top of libvirt want to make a decision on the
backend type for <interface type='user'/> (e.g. whether past is
supported) we currently offer them no way to learn this fact.
Domain capabilities were invented exactly for this reason. Report
supported net backend types there.
Now, because of backwards compatibility, specifying no backend
type (which translates to VIR_DOMAIN_NET_BACKEND_DEFAULT) means
"use hyperviosr's builtin SLIRP". That behaviour can not be
changed. But it may happen that the hypervisor has no support for
SLIRP. So we have to report it.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
In order to learn what types of <launchSecurity/> are supported
users can turn to domain capabilities and find <sev/> and
<s390-pv/> elements. While these may expose some additional info
on individual launchSecurity types, we are lacking clean
enumeration (like we do for say device models). And given that
SEV and SEV SNP share the same basis (info found under <sev/> is
applicable to SEV SNP too) we have no other way to report SEV SNP
support.
Therefore, report supported launchSecurity types in domain
capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Using check='none' when starting a domain with a CPU model marked as
usable is no longer needed as libvirt will do the right thing even with
check='partial'.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Our test driver lacks implementation for
virConnectGetDomainCapabilities(). Provide one, though a trivial
one. Mostly so that something else than VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT error
is returned.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Add async-teardown to the features list in domain capabilities allowing
high level management to introspect the availability of the asynchronous
teardown feature.
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
We already report the hosts physical address size in host capabilities,
but computing a baseline CPU definition is done from domain
capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Changes in this commit:
- docs: formatdomaincaps.rst
- conf: crypto related domain caps
- qemu: crypto related
- tests: crypto related test
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Now that we have qemuMonitorGetCPUModelExpansion() aware of
Hyper-V Enlightenments, we can start querying it. Two conditions
need to be met:
1) KVM is in use,
2) Arch is either x86 or arm.
It may look like modifying the first call to
qemuMonitorGetCPUModelExpansion() inside of
virQEMUCapsProbeQMPHostCPU() would be sufficient but it is not.
We really need to ask QEMU for full expansion and the first call
does not guarantee that.
For the test data, I've just copied whatever
'query-cpu-model-expansion' returned earlier, therefore there are
no hv-* props. But that's okay - the full expansion is not stored
in cache (and thus not formatted in
tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_*.replies files either). This is
purely runtime thing.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Extend hypervisor capabilities to include sgx feature. When available,
the hypervisor supports launching an VM with SGX on Intel platfrom.
The SGX feature tag privides additional details like section size and
sgx1 or sgx2.
Signed-off-by: Haibin Huang <haibin.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
As qemu becomes more modularized, it is important for libvirt to advertise
availability of the modularized functionality through capabilities. This
change adds channel devices to domain capabilities, allowing clients such
as virt-install to avoid using spicevmc channel devices when not supported
by the target qemu.
Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
As qemu becomes more modularized, it is important for libvirt to advertise
availability of the modularized functionality through capabilities. This
change adds USB redirect devices to domain capabilities, allowing clients
such as virt-install to avoid using redirdev devices when not supported
by the target qemu.
Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Even though several CPU models from various vendors are reported as
usable on a given host, user may still want to use only those that match
the host vendor. Currently the only place where users can check the
vendor of each CPU model is our CPU map, which is considered internal
and users should not really be using it directly. So to allow for such
filtering we now advertise the vendor of each CPU model in domain
capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
We accept TPM version in the domain XML. However, supported
version depends on the host (swtpm_setup binary) and thus it may
be tricky for users (or mgmt applications) chose a version.
Introduce machinery for reporting supported version in domain
capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Surprisingly, we don't document TPM part of domain capabilities.
Fortunately, the information exposed is pretty much self
explanatory, but we should document it regardless.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
While the links work they'd trip up the link validator script which will
be added later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
