This mode will enable all enlightenments known to the hypervisor. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851249
Example:
<features>
<hyperv mode='passthrough'/>
...
</features>
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Currently, this attribute may either have a value of "custom", or be absent
(which defaults to "custom"), for backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Allow for an optional attribute "mode", set to the string "custom".
Later patches will introduce different modes. Omitting this attribute
will default to "custom" for backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
This does not change the schema, but will make upcoming changes
easier.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Use two variables with automatic cleanup instead of reusing one.
Remove the pointless cleanup label.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reduce the scope of the variable to avoid mixing automatic and manual
cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Use g_auto for dnsmasq context and remove the cmd variable.
It was unused since its introduction in:
commit 8b32c80df0
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Use g_auto and get rid of the cleanup label, as well as the ret
variable.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Use g_auto where possible, reduce scope of some variables and remove
pointless ret and rc variables.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
On QEMU command line it's represented by the dirty-ring-size
attribute of KVM accelerator.
Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Dirty ring feature was introduced in qemu-6.1.0, this patch
add the corresponding feature named 'dirty-ring', which enable
dirty ring feature when starting VM.
To enable the feature, the following XML needs to be added to
the guest's domain description:
<features>
<kvm>
<dirty-ring state='on' size='xxx'>
</kvm>
</features>
If property "state=on", property "size" must be specified, which
should be power of 2 and range in [1024, 65526].
Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
In future commits we will need to store not just an array of
VIR_TRISTATE_SWITCH_* but also an additional integer. Follow the
example of TCG and introduce a structure where both the array an
integer can live.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
There is no longer anything to initialize at binary startup time.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Since the currentBackend (direct vs. firewalld) setting is no longer
used for anything, we don't need to set it (either explicitly from
tests, or implicitly during init), and can completely remove it.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
It's unclear exactly why this check exists; possibly a parallel to a
long-removed check for the firewall-cmd binary (added to viriptables.c
with the initial support for firewalld in commit bf156385a0 in 2012,
and long since removed), or possibly because virFirewallOnceInit() was
intended to be called at daemon startup, and it seemed like a good
idea to just log this error once when trying to determine whether to
use firewalld, or direct iptables commands, and then not waste time
building commands that could never be executed. The odd thing is that
it would sometimes result in logging an error when it couldn't find a
binary that wasn't needed anyway (e.g., if all the rules were iptables
rules, but ebtables and/or ip6tables weren't also installed).
If we just remove this check, then virCommandRun() will end up logging
an error and failing if the needed binary isn't found when we try to
execute it, which seems like it should just as good (or at least good
enough, especially since we eventually want to get rid of iptables
completely).
So let's remove it!
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
This function doesn't have anything to do with manipulating
virFirewall objects, but rather should be called in response to dbus
events about the firewalld service. Move this function into
virfirewalld.c, and rename it to virFirewallDSynchronize().
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
This function doesn't need to check for a backend - synchronization
with firewalld should always be done whenever firewalld is registered
and available, not just when the firewalld backend is selected.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Since commit b19863640 both useful cases of the switch statement in
this function have made the same call (and the other/default case is
just an error that can never happen). Eliminate the switch to help
eliminate use of currentBackend.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
It isn't intuitive (to me) that a test just converting xml text into
iptables commands should need to call dbus, so rather than forcing the
next person to look through the commit logs and/or run the test under
gdb to understand why this is needed, just add a short comment in the
source.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Several functions were simplified to remove the only cleanup code at
the cleanup label, making it unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
When libvirt added support for firewalld, all iptables/ebtables rules
were added via the firewalld "passthrough" API when firewalld was
enabled (the "firewalld backend"), or run directly by libvirt when
firewalld was disabled (the so-called "direct
backend"). virfirewalltest.c dutifully ran each test twice, once with
the each backend enabled.
But commit b19863640d changed the code to *always* directly run
iptables/ebtables commands, and never use the firewalld passthrough
API, effectively making the direct and firewalld backends identical,
except that when libvirt receives notice that firewalld has restarted
or reloaded its rules, the firewalld backend sends an extra "iptables
-V" command via firewalld's passthrough API (and waits for a response)
prior to running all the rest of the iptables commands directly; this
assures that a newly-restarted firewalld has finished its work on the
filter tables before libvirt starts messing with it. (Because this
code is only executed in response to an event from dbus, it isn't
tested in the unit tests).
In spite of this, we still go through all the virfirewall tests twice
though - once for the direct backend, and once for the firewalld
backend, even though these take the same codepath.
In commit b19863640d I had left this double-testing in thinking that
someday we might go back to actually doing something useful with the
firewalld backend in the course of adding support for native nftables,
but I've now realized that for the case of nftables we will be *even
more* divorced from firewalld, so there is really no point in keeping
this code around any longer. (It's likely/probable that the tests will
be done twice again in the future, but it will be enough different
that it is better to remove this code and re-implement from scratch
when adding the nftables backend, rather than trying to directly
modify the existing code and end up with something even more
confusing).
This patch eliminates all the test duplication in virfirewalltest.c,
including mocking dbus, which is unnecessary since none of the tests
use dbus (for now we ensure that by explicitly setting the virfirewall
backend to DIRECT before any of the tests have run. Eventually the
concept of a "firewalld backend" will disappear completely, but that's
for another patch.)
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Rather than calling these "ADD" and "REMOVE", which could be confused
with some other random items with the same names, make them more
specific by prepending "VIR_NETFILTER_" (because they will also be
used by the nftables backend) and rename them to match the
iptables/nftables operators they signify, i.e. INSERT and DELETE, just
to eliminate confusion (in particular, in case someone ever decides
that we need to also use the nftables "add" operator, which appends a
rule to a chain rather than inserting it at the beginning of the
chain).
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
This function formats an address + prefix as, e.g. 192.168.122.0/24,
which is useful in places other than iptables. Move it to
virsocketaddr.c and make it public so that others can use it. While
moving, the bit that masks off the host bits of the address is made
optional, so that the function is more generally useful.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
The network driver has put all its rules into private chains (created
by libvirt) since commit 7431b3eb9a, which was included in
libvirt-5.1.0. When the conversion was made, code was included that
would attempt to delete existing rules in the default chains, to make
it possible to upgrade libvirt without restarting the host OS.
Almost 3 years has passed, and it is doubtful that anyone will be
attempting to upgrade directly from a pre-5.1.0 libvirt to something
as new as 8.0.0 (possibly with the exception of upgrading the entire
OS to a new release, which would include also rebooting), so it is now
safe to remove this code.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
