If the user included loader.readonly=no in the domain XML, we
should not pick a firmware build that expects to work with
loader.readonly=yes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196178
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Most of these are just additional coverage, but a few demonstrate
bugs in libvirt:
* firmware-manual-efi-nvram-template-nonstandard sees the NVRAM
template path, which was explicitly provided in the XML,
being overridden by the firmware selection machinery;
* firmware-auto-efi-rw* and firmware-manual-efi-rw-legacy-paths
lose the loader.readonly=no setting and thus behave
differently than requested;
* firmware-manual-efi-loader-path-nonstandard fails because an
NVRAM path doesn't get generated.
We're going to address all these issues with upcoming changes.
Note that the firmware-auto-efi-nvram-template-nonstandard
failure is expected: firmware autoselection has been enabled, but
the NVRAM template points to a custom path that's not mentioned
in any of the firmware descriptors and so it can't succeed.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
