Since commit d399a728f4 placed the restore in the right scope the
restore can get removed in virDomainSEVDefParseXML.
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
We just found <qemu:commandline> is ignored in our xml. Further debug
shows that ctxt's node pointer isn't restored in virDomainSecDefParseXML(),
which leads to parsing of remaining elements failed.
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Adding availability of s390-pv in domain capabilities and adjust tests.
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Add launch security type 's390-pv' as well as some tests.
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Adding virDomainSecDef for general launch security data
and moving virDomainSEVDef as an element for SEV data.
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Make use of virDomainLaunchSecurity enum.
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Having multiple addresses having same hostname is a common config either
to have IPv4 and IPv6 address for the same hostname or even for DNS
round robin. The validation in the network update code didn't allow
adding such entries despite the fact that it is possible to define a
network with them.
Don't check hostname duplicity when adding a DNS entry.
The update of the test case adds another entry for the 'pudding'
hostname which is added in one of the networkxml2xmlupdate test cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
We need to report via domcapabilities if specifying shared memory
is supported without hugepages or numa config in order to find
out if domain has suitable setup to make virtiofs work.
The solution is to report source types of memory backing to
determine if memfd is a valid option.
Signed-off-by: Kristina Hanicova <khanicov@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
When users register the threshold event for the top level image with an
explicit index (e.g. vda[3]) they are clearly expecting the index in the
event.
This flag will help avoiding emission of the second event without the
index when the client clearly requested one with the index.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Tell whether a port definition is an ovs managed virtual port
Signed-off-by: Jinsheng Zhang <zhangjl02@inspur.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
It is possible to define/edit(in shut off state) a domain XML with
same hostdev device repeated more than once, as shown below. This
behavior is not expected. So, this patch fixes it.
vser1:
<domain type='kvm'>
[...]
<devices>
[...]
<hostdev mode='subsystem' type='mdev' managed='no' model='vfio-ccw'>
<source>
<address uuid='8e782fea-e5f4-45fa-a0f9-024cf66e5009'/>
</source>
<address type='ccw' cssid='0xfe' ssid='0x0' devno='0x0005'/>
</hostdev>
<hostdev mode='subsystem' type='mdev' managed='no' model='vfio-ccw'>
<source>
<address uuid='8e782fea-e5f4-45fa-a0f9-024cf66e5009'/>
</source>
<address type='ccw' cssid='0xfe' ssid='0x0' devno='0x0006'/>
</hostdev>
[...]
</devices>
</domain>
$ virsh define vser1
Domain 'vser1' defined from vser1
Signed-off-by: Shalini Chellathurai Saroja <shalini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Iterating over all child elements of a node does not require xpath.
By doing away with xpath for this code, the code can be simplified.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Cleanup to follow. This removes the last re-use of `nodes` in this function,
eliminating two VIR_FREEs.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Iterating over all child elements of a node does not require xpath.
By doing away with xpath for this code, the code can be simplified.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
`feature` is always one of the values listed in the switch,
ensured by `virDomainKVMTypeFromString` above.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Iterating over all child elements of a node does not require xpath.
By doing away with xpath for this code, the code can be simplified.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Iterating over all child elements of a node does not require xpath.
By doing away with xpath for this code, the code can be simplified.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Iterating over all child elements of a node does not require xpath.
By doing away with xpath for this code, the code can be inlined and
simplified. This also removes the re-use of `nodes`, elimininating
two VIR_FREEs.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
'file' is too generic to know what's going on. Rename it to
'memorysnapshotfile'.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
When adding support for externally launched virtiofsd,
I was too liberal and did not require a target.
But the target is required, because it's passed to the
QEMU device, not to virtiofsd.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1969232
Fixes: 12967c3e1333a6e106110f449ccb1e96279b9527
Fixes: 56dcdec1ac8104f94371c210585bab91eb36395d
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Links between NUMA nodes can have different latencies and
bandwidths. This info is newly defined in ACPI 6.2 under
Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table (HMAT) table. Linux kernel
learned how to report these values under sysfs and thus we can
expose them in our capabilities XML. The sysfs interface is
documented in kernel's Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst.
Long story short, two nodes can be in initiator-target
relationship. A node can be initiator if it has a CPU or a device
that's capable of initiating memory transfer. Therefore a node
that has just memory can only be target. An initiator-target link
can then have any combination of {bandwidth, latency} - {access,
read, write} attribute (6 in total). However, the standard says
access is applicable iff read and write values are the same.
Therefore, we really have just four combinations of attributes:
bandwidth-read, bandwidth-write, latency-read, latency-write.
This is the combination that kernel reports anyway.
Then, under /sys/system/devices/node/nodeX/acccessN/initiators we
find values for those 4 attributes and also symlinks named
"nodeN" which then represent initiators to nodeX. For instance:
/sys/system/node/node1/access1/initiators/node0 -> ../../node0
/sys/system/node/node1/access1/initiators/read_bandwidth
/sys/system/node/node1/access1/initiators/read_latency
/sys/system/node/node1/access1/initiators/write_bandwidth
/sys/system/node/node1/access1/initiators/write_latency
This means that node0 is initiator and node1 is target and values
of the interconnect can be read.
In theory, there can be separate links to memory side caches too
(e.g. one link from node X to node Y's main memory, another from
node X to node Y's L1 cache, another one to L2 cache and so on).
But sysfs does not express this relationship just yet.
The "accessN" means either "access0" or "access1". The difference
is that while the former expresses the best interconnect between
two nodes including CPUS and I/O devices (such as GPUs and NICs),
the latter includes only CPUs and thus is what we need.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786309
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Expose virNumaInterconnect XML formatter so that it can be
re-used by other parts of the code.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
There's nothing domain specific about NUMA interconnects. Rename
the virDomainNumaInterconnect* structures and enums to
virNumaInterconnect*.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
