The static CPU model expansion is designed to return only canonical
names of all CPU properties. To maintain backwards compatibility libvirt
is stuck with different spelling of some of the features, but we need to
use the full expansion to get the additional spellings. In addition to
returning all spelling variants for all properties the full expansion
will contain properties which are not guaranteed to be migration
compatible. Thus, we need to combine both expansions. First we need to
call the static expansion to limit the result to migratable properties.
Then we can use the result of the static expansion as an input to the
full expansion to get both canonical names and their aliases.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Our documentation of the domain capabilities XML says that the fallback
attribute of a CPU model is used to indicate whether the CPU model was
detected by libvirt itself (fallback="allow") or by asking the
hypervisor (fallback="forbid"). We need to properly set
fallback="forbid" when CPU model comes from QEMU to match the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
When qmp query-cpu-model-expansion is available probe Qemu for its view of the
host model. In kvm environments this can provide a more complete view of the
host model because features supported by Qemu and Kvm can be considered.
Signed-off-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tests domain capabilities on s390x using the Qemu 2.8 capabilities data.
Signed-off-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
QEMU 2.8.0 adds support for unavailable-features in
query-cpu-definitions reply. The unavailable-features array lists CPU
features which prevent a corresponding CPU model from being usable on
current host. It can only be used when all the unavailable features are
disabled. Empty array means the CPU model can be used without
modifications.
We can use unavailable-features for providing CPU model usability info
in domain capabilities XML:
<domainCapabilities>
...
<cpu>
<mode name='host-passthrough' supported='yes'/>
<mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
<model fallback='allow'>Skylake-Client</model>
...
</mode>
<mode name='custom' supported='yes'>
<model usable='yes'>qemu64</model>
<model usable='yes'>qemu32</model>
<model usable='no'>phenom</model>
<model usable='yes'>pentium3</model>
<model usable='yes'>pentium2</model>
<model usable='yes'>pentium</model>
<model usable='yes'>n270</model>
<model usable='yes'>kvm64</model>
<model usable='yes'>kvm32</model>
<model usable='yes'>coreduo</model>
<model usable='yes'>core2duo</model>
<model usable='no'>athlon</model>
<model usable='yes'>Westmere</model>
<model usable='yes'>Skylake-Client</model>
...
</mode>
</cpu>
...
</domainCapabilities>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
"host" CPU model is supported by a special host-passthrough CPU mode and
users is not allowed to specify this model directly with custom mode.
Thus we should not advertise "host" CPU model in domain capabilities.
This worked well on architectures for which libvirt provides a list of
supported CPU models in cpu_map.xml (since "host" is not in the list).
But we need to explicitly filter "host" model out for all other
architectures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
CPU models (and especially some additional details which we will start
probing for later) differ depending on the accelerator. Thus we need to
call query-cpu-definitions in both KVM and TCG mode to get all data we
want.
Tests in tests/domaincapstest.c are temporarily switched to TCG to avoid
having to squash even more stuff into this single patch. They will all
be switched back later in separate commits.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
We already have a "scsi" hostdev subsys type, which refers to a single
LUN that is passed through to a guest. But what of things where
multiple LUNs are passed through via a single SCSI HBA, such as with
the vhost-scsi target? Create a new hostdev subsys type that will
carry this.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch simplifies QEMU capabilities for QXL video device. QEMU
exposes this device as *qxl-vga* and *qxl* and they are both the same
device with the same set of parameters, the only difference is that
*qxl-vga* includes VGA compatibility.
Based on QEMU code they are tied together so it's safe to check only for
presence of only one of them.
This patch also removes an invalid test case "video-qxl-sec-nodevice"
where there is only *qxl-vga* device and *qxl* device is not present.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
The domain capabilities XML is capable of showing whether each guest CPU
mode is supported or not with a possibility to provide additional
details. This patch enhances host-model capability to advertise the
exact CPU model which will be used as a host-model:
<cpu>
...
<mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
<model fallback='allow'>Broadwell</model>
<vendor>Intel</vendor>
<feature policy='disable' name='aes'/>
<feature policy='require' name='vmx'/>
</mode>
...
</cpu>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
In case a hypervisor is able to tell us a list of supported CPU models
and whether each CPU models can be used on the current host, we can
propagate this to domain capabilities. This is a better alternative
to calling virConnectCompareCPU for each supported CPU model.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Listing all CPU models supported by QEMU in domain capabilities makes
little sense when libvirt will refuse any model it doesn't know about.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The patch adds <cpu> element to domain capabilities XML:
<cpu>
<mode name='host-passthrough' supported='yes'/>
<mode name='host-model' supported='yes'/>
<mode name='custom' supported='yes'>
<model>Broadwell</model>
<model>Broadwell-noTSX</model>
...
</mode>
</cpu>
Applications can use it to inspect what CPU configuration modes are
supported for a specific combination of domain type, emulator binary,
guest architecture and machine type.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Commit 2a58ed0b added support for creating guests with USB
hostdevs. Commit fc21d10 later added support for hotplut of
USB hostdevs. Advertise support for USB hostdevs in the
domcapabilities.
In addition add the appropriate caps for USB support on
domaincapstest when libvirt is built on a Xen with
LIBXL_HAVE_PVUSB. Otherwise domaincapstest would fail i.e.
testing the wrong domain capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Requires adding the plumbing for <device><video>
The value is <enum name='modelType'> to match the associated domain
XML of <video><model type='XXX'/>
Wire it up for qemu too
Well, even though users can pass the list of UEFI:NVRAM pairs at the
configure time, we may maintain the list of widely available UEFI
ourselves too. And as arm64 begin to rises, OVMF was ported there too.
With a slight name change - it's called AAVMF, with AAVMF_CODE.fd
being the UEFI firmware and AAVMF_VARS.fd being the NVRAM store file.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Check to see if the UEFI binary mentioned in qemu.conf actually
exists, and if so expose it in domcapabilities like
<loader ...>
<value>/path/to/ovmf</value>
</loader>
We introduce some generic domcaps infrastructure for handling
a dynamic list of string values, it may be of use for future bits.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
As of 542899168c we learned libvirt to use UEFI for domains.
However, management applications may firstly query if libvirt
supports it. And this is where virConnectGetDomainCapabilities()
API comes handy.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
So far only information on disks and host devices are exposed in the
capabilities XML. Well, at least something. Even a new test is
introduced. The qemu capabilities are stolen from already existing
qemucapabilities test. There's one tricky point though. Functions that
checks host's KVM and VFIO capabilities, are impossible to mock
currently. So in the test, we are setting the capabilities by hand.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
This new module holds and formats capabilities for emulator. If you
are about to create a new domain, you may want to know what is the
host or hypervisor capable of. To make sure we don't regress on the
XML, the formatting is not something left for each driver to
implement, rather there's general format function.
The domain capabilities is a lockable object (even though the locking
is not necessary yet) which uses reference counter.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
