These were the result of the conversion to RST by commit
97f21a82b2.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
We don't need to go to the trouble of telling users about existance of
insecure SASL mechanisms only to then say that they shouldn't be used.
We should only tell people about the GSSAPI mechanism for TCP sockets.
For the SCRAM mechanism we should be telling people about the SHA256
variant only, and also warning that the password database stores the
passwords in clear text.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
