The use case VIR_ALLOC_VAR deals with is very unlikely. We had just 2
legitimate uses, which were reimplemented locally using g_malloc0 and
sizeof instead as they used a static number of members of the trailing
array.
Remove VIR_ALLOC_VAR since in most cases the direct implementation is
shorter and clearer and there are no users of it currently.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
In this case we need a 'struct ethtool_gfeatures' followed by two
'struct ethtool_get_features_block' so there's no risk of overflow.
Use g_malloc0 and sizeof() to allocate the memory instead of
VIR_ALLOC_VAR.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
In both cases we need memory for a 'struct sanlk_resource' followed by
one 'struct sanlk_disk', thus there's no risk of overflow.
Use g_malloc0 and sizeof() to allocate the memory instead of
VIR_ALLOC_VAR.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Use g_autofree to allow removal of 'cleanup:' and the 'ret' variable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Use g_autofree and remove the 'cleanup' section and 'ret' variable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Switch to the more common approach of having arrays allocated separately
rather than trailing the struct.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Users were replaced with virSecureEraseString with explicit freeing of
the memory.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
There are no users any more. The replacement is to use g_auto and
virSecureEraseString explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
In this instance attempting to be correct is really pointless since the
secret is formatted into another string which is not erased securely and
then put on the commandline.
Keep the secure handling for correctness.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The macros are unused now and callers who care about clearing the memory
they use should use memset() appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The VIR_DISPOSE* APIs will be phased out. Additionally the test isn't
really doing useful work in ensuring that the values are indeed cleared
thus there's no point in keeping it around.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Clear out the value using virSecureErase and free it with g_free so
that VIR_DISPOSE_N can be phased out.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Clear the key and IV structs using virSecureErase.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Clear out the value using virSecureErase and free it with g_free so
that VIR_DISPOSE_N can be phased out.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Switch the secret value to 'g_autofree' for handling of the memory and
clear it out using virSecureErase.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Switch the secret value to 'g_autofree' for handling of the memory and
clear it out using virSecureErase.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Phase out use of VIR_DISPOSE_N from the qemu driver. Use memset in the
appropriate cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Clear the secret right after use with virSecureErase.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The code pretends that it cares about clearing the secret values, but
passes the secret value to a realloc, which may copy the value somewhere
else and doesn't sanitize the original location when it does so.
Since we want to construct a string from the value, let's copy it to a
new piece of memory which has the space for the 'NUL' byte ourselves, to
prevent a random realloc keeping the data around.
While at it, use virSecureErase instead of VIR_DISPOSE_N since it's
being phased out.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Use a single buffer for the secret to make it easier to follow it's
lifecycle. For base64 decoding use a local temporary buffer which will
be cleared right away.
This also uses virSecureErase for clearing the bufer instead of
VIR_DISPOSE_N which is being phased out.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The module will provide functions for disposing secrets stored in
memory.
Note that for now it's implemented using memset, which is not really
secure.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Shuffle the code around to remove the need for temporary variables and
labels for cleaning them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The check whether @keyfile is non-NULL is before locking @sess, but uses
the 'error' label which unlocks '@sess'.
While touching the error path, update the error message to be on one
line.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Convert the conditions to else if so that it's obvious that only one of
the cases will ever be used.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
When virRandomBytes fails we don't get any random bytes and even if we
did they don't have to be treated as secret as they weren't used in any
way.
Add a temporary variable with automatic freeing for the secret buffer
and assign it only on success.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The list isn't secret which would need being disposed of. Just expand
the array and return failure when adding the NULL terminator similarly
to how we expand the list for adding devices in a loop.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The struct doesn't contain any secrets to clear before freeing and even
if it did VIR_DISPOSE_N wouldn't help as the struct contains only
pointers thus the actual memory pointing to isn't sanitized.
Just free the params array pointer and then the struct itself.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Pass the parameter clock rt to qemu to ensure that the
virtual machine is not synchronized with the host time
Signed-off-by: gongwei <gongwei@smartx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
The headers weren't removed after use of VIR_STRDUP was removed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Found by clang-tidy's "bugprone-not-null-terminated-result" check.
clang-tidy's finding is a false positive in this case, as the
memset call guarantees null termination. The assignment can be
simplified though, and this happens to silence the warning.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Found by clang-tidy's "clang-analyzer-optin.portability.UnixAPI" check.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
"f + 0.5" does not round correctly for values very close to
".5" for every integer multiple, e.g. "0.499999975".
Found by clang-tidy's "bugprone-incorrect-roundings" check.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
`udevGetIntSysfsAttr` does not necessarily write to the third parameter,
even when it returns 0.
This was found by clang-tidy's
"clang-analyzer-core.UndefinedBinaryOperatorResult" check.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
This was found by clang-tidy's
"clang-analyzer-security.insecureAPI.bzero" check.
bzero is marked as deprecated ("LEGACY") in POSIX.1-2001 and
removed in POSIX.1-2008.
Besides its deprecation, bzero can be unsafe to use under certain
circumstances, e.g. when used to zero-out memory containing secrects.
These calls can be optimized away by the compiler, if it concludes no
further access happens to the memory, thus leaving the secrets still
in memory. Hence its classification as "insecureAPI".
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
pthread_sigmask() returns 0 on success and "a non-zero value
on failure", but not neccessarily a negative one.
Found by clang-tidy's "bugprone-posix-return" check.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
This was found by clang-tidy's "readability-misleading-indentation"
check.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
This was found by clang-tidy's "readability-misleading-indentation"
check.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
This section is guarded by "#ifndef WIN32" in line 2109--2808.
Found by clang-tidy's "readability-redundant-preprocessor" check.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
