Some failures of the post parse callback can be tolerated. This is
specifically desired when loading the configs of existing VMs. In such
case the post parse callback should not really be modifying anything
in the definition.
This patch adds a parse flag VIR_DOMAIN_DEF_PARSE_ALLOW_POST_PARSE_FAIL
which will allow the callbacks to report non-fatal failures by returning
a positive return value. In such case the field 'postParseFailed' in the
domain definition is set to true, to notify the drivers that the
callback failed and possibly needs to be re-run.
Rather than overload virObjectUnlock as commit id '77f4593b' has
done, create a separate virObjectRWUnlock API that will force the
consumers to make the proper decision regarding unlocking the
RWLock's. Similar to the RWLockRead and RWLockWrite, use the
virObjectGetRWLockableObj helper. This restores the virObjectUnlock
code to using the virObjectGetLockableObj.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Instead of making virObjectLock be the entry point for two
different types of locks, let's create a virObjectRWLockWrite API
which will only handle the virObjectRWLockableClass objects.
Use the new virObjectRWLockWrite for the virdomainobjlist code
in order to handle the Add, Remove, Rename, and Load operations
that need to be very synchronous.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Since the class it represents is based on virObjectRWLockableClass
and in order to make sure we differentiate just in case anyone somehow
believes they could use virObjectLockRead for a virObjectLockableClass,
let's rename the API to use the RW in the name. Besides the RW locks
refer to pthread_rwlock_{init|rdlock|wrlock|unlock|destroy} while the
other locks refer to pthread_mutex_{init|lock|unlock|destroy}.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
There is no reason why two threads trying to look up two domains
should mutually exclude each other. Utilize new
virObjectRWLockable that was just introduced.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
While searching for an element using a function it may be
desirable to know the element key for future operation.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
So far our code is full of the following pattern:
dom = virGetDomain(conn, name, uuid)
if (dom)
dom->id = 42;
There is no reasong why it couldn't be just:
dom = virGetDomain(conn, name, uuid, id);
After all, client domain representation consists of tuple (name,
uuid, id).
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
We want to pass the proper opaque pointer instead of NULL to
virDomainDefParse and subsequently virDomainDefParseNode too.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
In libxl driver we do virObjectRef in libxlDomainObjBeginJob,
If virCondWaitUntil failed, it goes to error, do virObjectUnref,
There's a chance that someone undefine the vm at the same time,
and refs unref to zero, vm is freed in libxlDomainObjBeginJob.
But the vm outside function is not Null, we do virObjectUnlock(vm).
That's how we overwrite the vm memory after it's freed. I fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufei <james.wangyufei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Until now we weren't able to add checks that would reject configuration
once accepted by the parser. This patch adds a new callback and
infrastructure to add such checks. In this patch all the places where
rejecting a now-invalid configuration wouldn't be a good idea are marked
with a new parser flag.
Our existing virHashForEach method iterates through all items disregarding the
fact, that some of the iterators might have actually failed. Errors are usually
dispatched through an error element in opaque data which then causes the
original caller of virHashForEach to return -1. In that case, virHashForEach
could return as soon as one of the iterators fail. This patch changes the
iterator return type and adjusts all of its instances accordingly, so the
actual refactor of virHashForEach method can be dealt with later.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
A pretty nasty deadlock occurs while trying to rename a VM in parallel
with virDomainObjListNumOfDomains.
The short description of the problem is as follows:
Thread #1:
qemuDomainRename:
------> aquires domain lock by qemuDomObjFromDomain
---------> waits for domain list lock in any of the listed functions:
- virDomainObjListFindByName
- virDomainObjListRenameAddNew
- virDomainObjListRenameRemove
Thread #2:
virDomainObjListNumOfDomains:
------> aquires domain list lock
---------> waits for domain lock in virDomainObjListCount
Introduce generic virDomainObjListRename function for renaming domains.
It aquires list lock in right order to avoid deadlock. Callback is used
to make driver specific domain updates.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Shirokovskiy <nshirokovskiy@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Our domain_conf.* files are big enough. Not only they contain XML
parsing code, but they served as a storage of all functions whose
name is virDomain prefixed. This is just wrong as it gathers not
related functions (and modules) into one big file which is then
harder to maintain. Split virDomainObjList module into a separate
file called virdomainobjlist.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
