The 32-bit x86 binary is called qemu-system-i386, not
qemu-system-i686. This mistake across many test XML files was
not noticed because the mistake was also made in testutilsqemu.c
when mocking the capabilities.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Previously we were ignoring "nodeset" attribute for hugepage pages
if there was no guest NUMA topology configured in the domain XML.
Commit <fa6bdf6afa878b8d7c5ed71664ee72be8967cdc5> partially fixed
that issue but it introduced a somehow valid regression.
In case that there is no guest NUMA topology configured and the
"nodeset" attribute is set to "0" it was accepted and was working
properly even though it was not completely valid XML.
This patch introduces a workaround that it will ignore the nodeset="0"
only in case that there is no guest NUMA topology in order not to
hit the validation error.
After this commit the following XML configuration is valid:
<memoryBacking>
<hugepages>
<page size='2048' unit='KiB' nodeset='0'/>
</hugepages>
</memoryBacking>
but this configuration remains invalid:
<memoryBacking>
<hugepages>
<page size='2048' unit='KiB' nodeset='0'/>
<page size='1048576' unit='KiB'/>
</hugepages>
</memoryBacking>
The issue with the second configuration is that it was originally
working, however changing the order of the <page> elements resolved
into using different page size for the guest. The code is written
in a way that it expect only one page configured and always uses only
the first page in case that there is no guest NUMA topology configured.
See qemuBuildMemPathStr() function for details.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591235
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
We can safely validate the hugepage nodeset attribute at a define time.
This validation is not done for already existing domains when the daemon
is restarted.
All the changes to the tests are necessary because we move the error
from domain start into XML parse.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This use-case was broken by commit
<fa6bdf6afa878b8d7c5ed71664ee72be8967cdc5>.
We allowed this configuration and it was working as expected therefore
we can consider it as regression. We should have never allowed such
configuration so now the best solution is in case of non-numa guest
silently ignore the 'nodeset' attribute if it's set to '0'.
That will be fixed by following patches.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
