When GIC support was introduced (QEMU 2.6 timeframe) we needed
to make sure both GICv2 hardware and GICv3 hardware were handled
correctly, and that was achieved by having separate capabilities
data for each.
Now that we have capabilities data for several QEMU versions we
can stop storing data for GICv2 and GICv3 hardware separately,
and instead have GICv2 data for QEMU <= 2.10 and GICv3 data for
QEMU >= 2.12, without losing any coverage.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Test cases in qemucapabilitiestest are ordered by architecture
first, then by QEMU version. Use the same order here.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
==25251== 5 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 81
==25251== at 0x4C2BEDF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==25251== by 0x967E379: strdup (in /lib64/libc-2.25.so)
==25251== by 0x5366F9F: virStrdup (virstring.c:941)
==25251== by 0x538BF1D: virDomainCapsNew (domain_capabilities.c:121)
==25251== by 0x10EACE: test_virDomainCapsFormat (domaincapstest.c:295)
==25251== by 0x10FBD2: virTestRun (testutils.c:180)
==25251== by 0x10F192: mymain (domaincapstest.c:457)
==25251== by 0x111C7F: virTestMain (testutils.c:1119)
==25251== by 0x10FA3C: main (domaincapstest.c:528)
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
The architecture itself is called ppc64, and it can run both in big
endian and little endian mode - the latter is known as ppc64le.
From the (virtual) hardware point of view, ppc64 is a more accurate
name so it should be used here.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Right-aligning backslashes when defining macros or using complex
commands in Makefiles looks cute, but as soon as any changes is
required to the code you end up with either distractingly broken
alignment or unnecessarily big diffs where most of the changes
are just pushing all backslashes a few characters to one side.
Generated using
$ git grep -El '[[:blank:]][[:blank:]]\\$' | \
grep -E '*\.([chx]|am|mk)$$' | \
while read f; do \
sed -Ei 's/[[:blank:]]*[[:blank:]]\\$/ \\/g' "$f"; \
done
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
When a hypervisor marks a CPU model as unusable on the current host, it
may also give us a list of features which prevent the model from being
usable. Storing this list in virDomainCapsCPUModel will help the CPU
driver with creating a host-model CPU configuration.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Move all the host CPU data into a separate file and rewrite qemucpumock
to not use passed @caps. This is preparation for following patch which
will replace virCaps argument with virArch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Add a path for UEFI VMs for AArch32 VMs, based on the path Debian is using.
libvirt is the de facto canonical location for defining where distros
should place these firmware images, so let's define this path here to try
and minimize distro fragmentation.
* Extract filling bhyve capabilities from virBhyveDomainCapsBuild()
into a new function virBhyveDomainCapsFill() to make testing
easier by not having to mock firmware directory listing and
hypervisor capabilities probing
* Also, just presence of the firmware files is not sufficient
to enable os.loader.supported, hypervisor should support UEFI
boot too
* Add tests to domaincapstest for the main caps possible flows:
- when UEFI bootrom is supported
- when video (fbus) is supported
- neither of above is supported
One of the main reasons for introducing host-model CPU definition in a
domain capabilities XML was the inability to express disabled features
in a host capabilities XML. That is, when a host CPU is, e.g., Haswell
without x2apic support, host capabilities XML will have to report it as
Westmere + a bunch of additional features., but we really want to use
Haswell - x2apic when creating a host-model CPU.
Unfortunately, I somehow forgot to do the last step and the code would
just copy the CPU definition found in the host capabilities XML. This
changed recently for new QEMU versions which allow us to query host CPU,
but any slightly older QEMU will not benefit from any change I did. This
patch makes sure the right CPU model is filled in the domain
capabilities even with old QEMU.
The issue was reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426456
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Tests domain capabilities on s390x using the Qemu 2.8 capabilities data.
Signed-off-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CPU models (and especially some additional details which we will start
probing for later) differ depending on the accelerator. Thus we need to
call query-cpu-definitions in both KVM and TCG mode to get all data we
want.
Tests in tests/domaincapstest.c are temporarily switched to TCG to avoid
having to squash even more stuff into this single patch. They will all
be switched back later in separate commits.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The domain capabilities XML is capable of showing whether each guest CPU
mode is supported or not with a possibility to provide additional
details. This patch enhances host-model capability to advertise the
exact CPU model which will be used as a host-model:
<cpu>
...
<mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
<model fallback='allow'>Broadwell</model>
<vendor>Intel</vendor>
<feature policy='disable' name='aes'/>
<feature policy='require' name='vmx'/>
</mode>
...
</cpu>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Host capabilities provide libvirt's view of the host CPU, but for a
useful support for host-model CPUs we really need a hypervisor's view of
the CPU. And since the view can be differ with emulator, qemu
capabilities is the best place to store the host CPU model.
This patch just copies the CPU model from host capabilities, but this
will change in the future.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
In case a hypervisor is able to tell us a list of supported CPU models
and whether each CPU models can be used on the current host, we can
propagate this to domain capabilities. This is a better alternative
to calling virConnectCompareCPU for each supported CPU model.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The patch adds <cpu> element to domain capabilities XML:
<cpu>
<mode name='host-passthrough' supported='yes'/>
<mode name='host-model' supported='yes'/>
<mode name='custom' supported='yes'>
<model>Broadwell</model>
<model>Broadwell-noTSX</model>
...
</mode>
</cpu>
Applications can use it to inspect what CPU configuration modes are
supported for a specific combination of domain type, emulator binary,
guest architecture and machine type.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Commit 2a58ed0b added support for creating guests with USB
hostdevs. Commit fc21d10 later added support for hotplut of
USB hostdevs. Advertise support for USB hostdevs in the
domcapabilities.
In addition add the appropriate caps for USB support on
domaincapstest when libvirt is built on a Xen with
LIBXL_HAVE_PVUSB. Otherwise domaincapstest would fail i.e.
testing the wrong domain capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
The virQEMUDriverConfig object contains lists of
loader:nvram pairs to advertise firmwares supported by
by the driver, and qemu_conf.c contains code to populate
the lists, all of which is useful for other drivers too.
To avoid code duplication, introduce a virFirmware object
to encapsulate firmware details and switch the qemu driver
to use it.
Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Requires adding the plumbing for <device><video>
The value is <enum name='modelType'> to match the associated domain
XML of <video><model type='XXX'/>
Wire it up for qemu too
The struct contains a single boolean field, 'supported':
the meaning of this field is too generic to be limited to
devices only, and in fact it's already being used for
other things like loaders and OSs.
Instead of trying to come up with a more generic name just
get rid of the struct altogether.
