There's nothing x86 specific about this function. Rename the
function so that it has DMI suffix which enables it to be reused
on different arches (as using X86 from say ARM would look
suspicious).
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
This test case uses (anonimized) data pulled from a
GIGABYTE R120-T34 server.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
We have a single mock dmidecode script right now, but we're
going to add another one soon, so we need to make sure its
name contains the test case name as a prefix, just like we
already do with all data files.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Require that all headers are guarded by a symbol named
LIBVIRT_$FILENAME
where $FILENAME is the uppercased filename, with all characters
outside a-z changed into '_'.
Note we do not use a leading __ because that is technically a
namespace reserved for the toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
In many files there are header comments that contain an Author:
statement, supposedly reflecting who originally wrote the code.
In a large collaborative project like libvirt, any non-trivial
file will have been modified by a large number of different
contributors. IOW, the Author: comments are quickly out of date,
omitting people who have made significant contribitions.
In some places Author: lines have been added despite the person
merely being responsible for creating the file by moving existing
code out of another file. IOW, the Author: lines give an incorrect
record of authorship.
With this all in mind, the comments are useless as a means to identify
who to talk to about code in a particular file. Contributors will always
be better off using 'git log' and 'git blame' if they need to find the
author of a particular bit of code.
This commit thus deletes all Author: comments from the source and adds
a rule to prevent them reappearing.
The Copyright headers are similarly misleading and inaccurate, however,
we cannot delete these as they have legal meaning, despite being largely
inaccurate. In addition only the copyright holder is permitted to change
their respective copyright statement.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
All of the ones being removed are pulled in by internal.h. The only
exception is sanlock which expects the application to include <stdint.h>
before sanlock's headers, because sanlock prototypes use fixed width
int, but they don't include stdint.h themselves, so we have to leave
that one in place.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
It doesn't really make sense for us to have stdlib.h and string.h but
not stdio.h in the internal.h header.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Clang 6.0.0 complains when initializing structure with { NULL }:
conf/domain_addr.c:1494:38: error: missing field 'type' initializer [-Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers]
virDomainDeviceInfo nfo = { NULL };
Use { 0 } instead to make it happy.
Signed-off-by: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Let's add a test case for S390 with CPU frequency information available.
Test data is sampled from an IBM z13 system running kernel 4.14 on LPAR.
Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Due to a kernel commit (b4b8f770e), cpuinfo format has changed on
ARMs. Firstly, 'Processor: ...' may not be reported, it's
replaced by 'model name: ...'. Secondly, the "Processor" string
may occur in CPU name, e.g. 'ARMv7 Processor rev 5 (v7l)'.
Therefore, we must firstly look for 'model name' and then for
'Processor' if not found.
Moreover, lines in the cpuinfo file are shuffled, so we better
not manipulate the pointer to start of internal buffer as we may
lost some info.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Most of our code base uses space after comma but not before;
fix the remaining uses before adding a syntax check.
* tests/sysinfotest.c: Consistently use commas.
* tests/viratomictest.c: Likewise.
* tests/vircgroupmock.c: Likewise.
* tools/virsh-domain.c: Likewise.
* tools/virsh-volume.c: Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Implement the bare minimal sysinfo for AArch64 platforms by
reading the CPU models from /proc/cpuinfo.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>
The test case average timing code has not been used by any test
case ever. Delete it to remove complexity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Actually, I'm turning this function into a macro as filename,
function name and line number needs to be passed. The new
function virAsprintfInternal is introduced with the extended set
of arguments.
The source code base needs to be adapted as well. Some files
include virutil.h just for the string related functions (here,
the include is substituted to match the new file), some include
virutil.h without any need (here, the include is removed), and
some require both.
Implement the bare minimal sysinfo for ARM platforms by
reading the CPU models from /proc/cpuinfo
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Certain functions in the sysinfotest.c are not used unless
a whitelisted architecture is being built. Disable those
functions unless required to avoid warnings about unused
functions.
sysinfotest.c:93:1: warning: 'sysinfotest_run' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
sysinfotest_run(const char *test,
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
This patch is to enable virSysinfoRead test case for POWER,
and provide sysinfo data on POWER.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhlcindy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Test cases for virSysinfoRead. Initially, there are tests for
x86 (DMI based) and s390 (/proc/... based).
In lack of PPC data, I have stubbed out the test for it, but it
can be added with a minimal effort.
Signed-off-by: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
