The code historically skipped the 'format' field for 'raw' images as we
didn't output it when no format support was present. Stop misleading and
output the format also for 'raw' images.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
If the configuration explicitly requests a specific type of
firmware image, be it pflash or ROM, we should ignore all images
that are not of that type.
If no specific type has been requested, of course, any type is
considered a match and the selection will be based upon the
other attributes.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
This new test case covers the scenario in which the user
specifically asked for a read/write pflash image.
From the output files, we can see that the firmware selection
algorithm has picked a ROM image, which demonstrates the
presence of another bug. We're going to fix it with an upcoming
commit.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
