It will be used in that file later on, plus it makes sense for all the
implementations to be in same place. Also comment each one of them nicely and
add a comment explaining why they all need to end with the same _LAST value.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
There is no need to have virResctrlGetInfo() when it must be called after
virResctrlInfoNew() anyway, otherwise it's just an unusable object. When we
wrap the logic inside the New() function we'll save some calls later as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
With this commit we finally have a way to read and manipulate basic resctrl
settings. Locking is done only on exposed functions that read/write from/to
resctrlfs. Not in functions that are exposed in virresctrlpriv.h as those are
only supposed to be used from tests.
More information about how resctrl works:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
This will make the current functions obsolete and it will provide more
information to the virresctrl module so that it can be used later.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
This way later patches can add another structures with virResctrl
prefix without the meaning being even more confusing than it needs to
be.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
It doesn't access anything from conf/ and ti will be needed to use
from other util/ places. This split makes the separation clearer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
