Having multiple addresses having same hostname is a common config either
to have IPv4 and IPv6 address for the same hostname or even for DNS
round robin. The validation in the network update code didn't allow
adding such entries despite the fact that it is possible to define a
network with them.
Don't check hostname duplicity when adding a DNS entry.
The update of the test case adds another entry for the 'pudding'
hostname which is added in one of the networkxml2xmlupdate test cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Having multiple addresses for the same hostname is a legitimate
configuration in DNS. Add test data to cover this case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
virSocketAddrGetRange() has been updated to take the network address
and prefix, and now checks that both the start and end of the range
are within that network, thus validating that the entire range of
addresses is in the network. For IPv4, it also checks that ranges to
not start with the "network address" of the subnet, nor end with the
broadcast address of the subnet (this check doesn't apply to IPv6,
since IPv6 doesn't have a broadcast or network address)
Negative tests have been added to the network update and socket tests
to verify that bad ranges properly generate an error.
This resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985653
The previous patch fixed "forwardPlainNames" so that it really is
doing only what is intended, but left the default to be
"forwardPlainNames='no'". Discussion around the initial version of
that patch led to the decision that the default should instead be
"forwardPlainNames='yes'" (i.e. the original behavior before commit
f3886825). This patch makes that change to the default.
