Right now, we only generate it after finding a matching entry
either among firmware descriptors or in the legacy firmware
list.
Even if the domain is configured to use a custom firmware build
that we know nothing about, however, we should still automatically
generate the NVRAM path instead of requiring the user to provide
it manually.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Most of these are just additional coverage, but a few demonstrate
bugs in libvirt:
* firmware-manual-efi-nvram-template-nonstandard sees the NVRAM
template path, which was explicitly provided in the XML,
being overridden by the firmware selection machinery;
* firmware-auto-efi-rw* and firmware-manual-efi-rw-legacy-paths
lose the loader.readonly=no setting and thus behave
differently than requested;
* firmware-manual-efi-loader-path-nonstandard fails because an
NVRAM path doesn't get generated.
We're going to address all these issues with upcoming changes.
Note that the firmware-auto-efi-nvram-template-nonstandard
failure is expected: firmware autoselection has been enabled, but
the NVRAM template points to a custom path that's not mentioned
in any of the firmware descriptors and so it can't succeed.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
