QEMU has possibility to call madvise(.., MADV_REMOVE) in some
cases. Expose this feature to users by new element/attribute
discard.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
The function returns true/false depending on distance
configuration being present in the domain XML.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Rename virDomainNumaDefCPUFormat to virDomainNumaDefCPUFormatXML,
matching its peer virDomainNumaDefCPUParseXML and the general
vir*{Format,Parse}XML conventions.
Signed-off-by: Wim ten Have <wim.ten.have@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Rename to avoid duplicate code. Because virDomainMemoryAccess will be
used in memorybacking for setting default behaviour.
NOTE: The enum cannot be moved to qemu/domain_conf because of headers
dependency
This function should return the greatest CPU number set in
/domain/cpu/numa/cell/@cpus. The idea is that we should compare
the returned value against /domain/vcpu value. Yes, there exist
users who think the following is a good idea:
<vcpu placement='static'>4</vcpu>
<cpu mode='host-model'>
<model fallback='allow'/>
<numa>
<cell id='0' cpus='0-1' memory='1048576' unit='KiB'/>
<cell id='1' cpus='9-10' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/>
</numa>
</cpu>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
So far, we are not reporting if numatune was even defined. The
value of zero is blindly returned (which maps onto
VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_STRICT). Unfortunately, we are making
decisions based on this value. Instead, we should not only return
the correct value, but report to the caller if the value is valid
at all.
For better viewing of this patch use '-w'.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
For historical reasons data regarding NUMA configuration were split
between the CPU definition and numatune. We cannot do anything about the
XML still being split, but we certainly can at least store the relevant
data in one place.
This patch moves the NUMA stuff to the right place.
As virDomainNumatuneSet now doesn't allocate the virDomainNuma object
any longer it's not necessary to pass the pointer to a pointer to store
the object as it will not change any longer.
While touching the parameter definitions I've also changed the name of
the parameter to "numa".
Since our formatter now handles well if the config is allocated and not
filled we can safely always-allocate the NUMA config and remove the
ad-hoc allocation code.
This will help in later patches as the parser will be refactored to just
fill the data.
It's easier to recalculate the number in the one place it's used as
having a separate variable to track it. It will also help with moving
the NUMA code to the separate module.
Name it virNumaMemAccess and add it to conf/numa_conf.[ch]
Note that to avoid a circular dependency the type of the NUMA cell
memAccess variable was changed to int. It will be turned back later
after the circular dependency will not exist.
For weird historical reasons NUMA cells are added as a subelement of
<cpu> while the actual configuration is done in <numatune>.
This patch splits out the cell parser code from cpu config to NUMA
config. Note that the changes to the code are minimal just to make it
work and the function will be refactored in the next patch.
For a while now there are two places that gather information about NUMA
related guest configuration. While the XML can't be changed we can at
least store the data in one place in the definition.
Rename the numatune_conf.[ch] files to numa_conf as later patches will
move the rest of the definitions from the cpu definition to this one.
