Ever since commit c5a00350 the libxl parser invokes the emulator
to probe which device model to use.
Commit b90c4b5 introduced a workaround that used a stable path
which was very likely to result in the answer matching the default.
However the test is still affected by the host state and the binary
gets invoked if present.
Mock the libxlDomainGetEmulatorType function to stop wasting CPU
cycles every time a 'make check' is run on a system with xen installed.
For example xlconfigtest gets faster by 90 %
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Fixes: b90c4b5f50
Reviewed-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
No functional change, but this will allow us to mock out the function
in the test suite
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Require that all headers are guarded by a symbol named
LIBVIRT_$FILENAME
where $FILENAME is the uppercased filename, with all characters
outside a-z changed into '_'.
Note we do not use a leading __ because that is technically a
namespace reserved for the toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
In many files there are header comments that contain an Author:
statement, supposedly reflecting who originally wrote the code.
In a large collaborative project like libvirt, any non-trivial
file will have been modified by a large number of different
contributors. IOW, the Author: comments are quickly out of date,
omitting people who have made significant contribitions.
In some places Author: lines have been added despite the person
merely being responsible for creating the file by moving existing
code out of another file. IOW, the Author: lines give an incorrect
record of authorship.
With this all in mind, the comments are useless as a means to identify
who to talk to about code in a particular file. Contributors will always
be better off using 'git log' and 'git blame' if they need to find the
author of a particular bit of code.
This commit thus deletes all Author: comments from the source and adds
a rule to prevent them reappearing.
The Copyright headers are similarly misleading and inaccurate, however,
we cannot delete these as they have legal meaning, despite being largely
inaccurate. In addition only the copyright holder is permitted to change
their respective copyright statement.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
