Admin API needs a way of addressing specific clients. Unlike servers, which we
are happy to address by names both because its name reflects its purpose (to
some extent) and we only have two of them (so far), naming clients doesn't make
any sense, since a) each client is an anonymous, i.e. not recognized after a
disconnect followed by a reconnect, b) we can't predict what kind of requests
it's going to send to daemon, and c) the are loads of them comming and going,
so the only viable option is to use an ID which is of a reasonably wide data
type.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
The test case average timing code has not been used by any test
case ever. Delete it to remove complexity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Start a test case for the virNetServerClient object, which
initially checks the creation of a virIdentityPtr object.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
