In preparation libtool "-module" flag removal, add lib prefix to all
mock shared objects.
While at it, introduce VIR_TEST_MOCK macros that makes path out of mock
name to be used with VIR_TEST_PRELOAD or VIR_TEST_MAIN_PRELOAD. That,
hopefully, improves readability, reduces line length and allows to
tailor VIR_TEST_MOCK for specific platform if it has shared library
suffix different from ".so".
Signed-off-by: Roman Bolshakov <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>
In many files there are header comments that contain an Author:
statement, supposedly reflecting who originally wrote the code.
In a large collaborative project like libvirt, any non-trivial
file will have been modified by a large number of different
contributors. IOW, the Author: comments are quickly out of date,
omitting people who have made significant contribitions.
In some places Author: lines have been added despite the person
merely being responsible for creating the file by moving existing
code out of another file. IOW, the Author: lines give an incorrect
record of authorship.
With this all in mind, the comments are useless as a means to identify
who to talk to about code in a particular file. Contributors will always
be better off using 'git log' and 'git blame' if they need to find the
author of a particular bit of code.
This commit thus deletes all Author: comments from the source and adds
a rule to prevent them reappearing.
The Copyright headers are similarly misleading and inaccurate, however,
we cannot delete these as they have legal meaning, despite being largely
inaccurate. In addition only the copyright holder is permitted to change
their respective copyright statement.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Now that GnuTLS is a requirement, we can drop a lot of
conditionally built code. However, not all ifdef-s can go because
we still want libvirt_setuid to build without gnutls.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
If @client hasn't been opened, then don't call virNetServerClientClose
since that'll cause certain failure.
Found by Coverity
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Validate that the virNetServer(Client) RPC APIs are processing the
private data callbacks correctly by passing in non-NULL pointers.
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Direct leak of 104 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f904bfbe12b (/lib64/liblsan.so.0+0xe12b)
#1 0x7f904ba0ad67 in virAlloc ../../src/util/viralloc.c:144
#2 0x7f904bbc11a4 in virNetMessageNew ../../src/rpc/virnetmessage.c:42
#3 0x7f904bbb8e77 in virNetServerClientNewInternal ../../src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c:392
#4 0x7f904bbb9921 in virNetServerClientNew ../../src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c:440
#5 0x402ce5 in testIdentity ../../tests/virnetserverclienttest.c:55
#6 0x403bed in virTestRun ../../tests/testutils.c:180
#7 0x402c1e in mymain ../../tests/virnetserverclienttest.c:146
#8 0x404c80 in virTestMain ../../tests/testutils.c:1119
#9 0x4030d5 in main ../../tests/virnetserverclienttest.c:152
#10 0x7f9047f7f889 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20889)
Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f904bfbe12b (/lib64/liblsan.so.0+0xe12b)
#1 0x7f904ba0adc7 in virAllocN ../../src/util/viralloc.c:191
#2 0x7f904bbb8ec7 in virNetServerClientNewInternal ../../src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c:395
#3 0x7f904bbb9921 in virNetServerClientNew ../../src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c:440
#4 0x402ce5 in testIdentity ../../tests/virnetserverclienttest.c:55
#5 0x403bed in virTestRun ../../tests/testutils.c:180
#6 0x402c1e in mymain ../../tests/virnetserverclienttest.c:146
#7 0x404c80 in virTestMain ../../tests/testutils.c:1119
#8 0x4030d5 in main ../../tests/virnetserverclienttest.c:152
#9 0x7f9047f7f889 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20889)
SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 108 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Admin API needs a way of addressing specific clients. Unlike servers, which we
are happy to address by names both because its name reflects its purpose (to
some extent) and we only have two of them (so far), naming clients doesn't make
any sense, since a) each client is an anonymous, i.e. not recognized after a
disconnect followed by a reconnect, b) we can't predict what kind of requests
it's going to send to daemon, and c) the are loads of them comming and going,
so the only viable option is to use an ID which is of a reasonably wide data
type.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
The test case average timing code has not been used by any test
case ever. Delete it to remove complexity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Start a test case for the virNetServerClient object, which
initially checks the creation of a virIdentityPtr object.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
