mirror of
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt.git
synced 2024-11-02 19:31:18 +00:00
2b510e4903
For a while we're have random failures of 'securityselinuxtest' which were not at all reproducible. Fortunately we finally caught a failure with VIR_TEST_DEBUG=1 enabled. This revealed TEST: securityselinuxtest 1) GenLabel "dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023" ... OK 2) GenLabel "dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023" ... OK 3) GenLabel "dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023" ... OK 4) GenLabel "dynamic virtd, s0, c0.c1023" ... OK 5) GenLabel "dynamic virtd, s0, c0.c10" ... OK 6) GenLabel "dynamic virtd, s2-s3, c0.c1023" ... OK 7) GenLabel "dynamic virtd, missing range" ... Category two 1024 is out of range 0-1023 FAILED FAIL: securityselinuxtest And sure enough we had an off-by-1 in the MCS range code when the current process has no range set. The test suite randomly allocates 2 categories from 0->1024 so the chances of hitting this in the test suite were slim indeed :-) Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
security_apparmor.c | ||
security_apparmor.h | ||
security_dac.c | ||
security_dac.h | ||
security_driver.c | ||
security_driver.h | ||
security_manager.c | ||
security_manager.h | ||
security_nop.c | ||
security_nop.h | ||
security_selinux.c | ||
security_selinux.h | ||
security_stack.c | ||
security_stack.h | ||
virt-aa-helper.c |