Michal Privoznik 2ce20ba839 docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg
Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it
missed my patches: users should prefer <oemStrings/> over fwcfg.
The reason is that fwcfg is considered somewhat internal to QEMU
and it has limited number of slots and neither of these applies
to <oemStrings/>.

While I'm at it, I'm fixing the example too (because it contains
incorrect element name) and clarifying sysfs/ exposure.

1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2020-May/msg00957.html

Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
2020-09-08 14:19:51 +02:00
..
2020-08-25 07:04:41 +02:00
2020-07-03 11:00:51 +02:00
2020-08-04 15:49:12 +02:00