passt: Relicense to GPL 2.0, or any later version
In practical terms, passt doesn't benefit from the additional
protection offered by the AGPL over the GPL, because it's not
suitable to be executed over a computer network.
Further, restricting the distribution under the version 3 of the GPL
wouldn't provide any practical advantage either, as long as the passt
codebase is concerned, and might cause unnecessary compatibility
dilemmas.
Change licensing terms to the GNU General Public License Version 2,
or any later version, with written permission from all current and
past contributors, namely: myself, David Gibson, Laine Stump, Andrea
Bolognani, Paul Holzinger, Richard W.M. Jones, Chris Kuhn, Florian
Weimer, Giuseppe Scrivano, Stefan Hajnoczi, and Vasiliy Ulyanov.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
2023-04-05 18:11:44 +00:00
|
|
|
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
|
2021-10-19 10:43:28 +00:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2021 Red Hat GmbH
|
|
|
|
|
* Author: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-25 23:05:31 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifndef NDP_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define NDP_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
ndp: Send unsolicited Router Advertisements
Currently, our NDP implementation only sends Router Advertisements (RA)
when it receives a Router Solicitation (RS) from the guest. However,
RFC 4861 requires that we periodically send unsolicited RAs.
Linux as a guest also requires this: it will send an RS when a link first
comes up, but the route it gets from this will have a finite lifetime (we
set this to 65535s, the maximum allowed, around 18 hours). When that
expires the guest will not send a new RS, but instead expects the route to
have been renewed (if still valid) by an unsolicited RA.
Implement sending unsolicited RAs on a partially randomised timer, as
required by RFC 4861. The RFC also specifies that solicited RAs should
also be delayed, or even omitted, if the next unsolicited RA is soon
enough. For now we don't do that, always sending an immediate RA in
response to an RS. We can get away with this because in our use cases
we expect to just have passt itself and the guest on the link, rather than
a large broadcast domain.
Link: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues/13191
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
2024-11-14 03:33:10 +00:00
|
|
|
struct icmp6hdr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-14 03:33:03 +00:00
|
|
|
int ndp(const struct ctx *c, const struct icmp6hdr *ih,
|
|
|
|
|
const struct in6_addr *saddr, const struct pool *p);
|
ndp: Send unsolicited Router Advertisements
Currently, our NDP implementation only sends Router Advertisements (RA)
when it receives a Router Solicitation (RS) from the guest. However,
RFC 4861 requires that we periodically send unsolicited RAs.
Linux as a guest also requires this: it will send an RS when a link first
comes up, but the route it gets from this will have a finite lifetime (we
set this to 65535s, the maximum allowed, around 18 hours). When that
expires the guest will not send a new RS, but instead expects the route to
have been renewed (if still valid) by an unsolicited RA.
Implement sending unsolicited RAs on a partially randomised timer, as
required by RFC 4861. The RFC also specifies that solicited RAs should
also be delayed, or even omitted, if the next unsolicited RA is soon
enough. For now we don't do that, always sending an immediate RA in
response to an RS. We can get away with this because in our use cases
we expect to just have passt itself and the guest on the link, rather than
a large broadcast domain.
Link: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues/13191
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
2024-11-14 03:33:10 +00:00
|
|
|
void ndp_timer(const struct ctx *c, const struct timespec *now);
|
2022-03-25 23:05:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* NDP_H */
|
