mirror of
https://passt.top/passt
synced 2024-11-09 22:29:56 +00:00
udp: Fix 16-bit overflow in udp_invert_portmap()
The code in udp_invert_portmap() is written based on an incorrect understanding of C's (arcane) integer promotion rules. We calculate '(in_port_t)i + delta' expecting the result to be of type in_port_t (16 bits). However "small integer types" (those narrower than 'int') are always promoted to int for expressions, meaning this calculation can overrun the rdelta[] array. Fix this, and use a new intermediate for the index, to make it very clear what it's type is. We also change i to unsigned, to avoid any possible confusion from mixing signed and unsigned types. Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=80 Reported-by: Laurent Jacquot <jk@lutty.net> Suggested-by: Laurent Jacquot <jk@lutty.net> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8954c4a91b
commit
1e6f92b995
5
udp.c
5
udp.c
@ -258,15 +258,16 @@ void udp_portmap_clear(void)
|
|||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static void udp_invert_portmap(struct udp_port_fwd *fwd)
|
static void udp_invert_portmap(struct udp_port_fwd *fwd)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int i;
|
unsigned int i;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta) == ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->rdelta),
|
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta) == ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->rdelta),
|
||||||
"Forward and reverse delta arrays must have same size");
|
"Forward and reverse delta arrays must have same size");
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta); i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta); i++) {
|
||||||
in_port_t delta = fwd->f.delta[i];
|
in_port_t delta = fwd->f.delta[i];
|
||||||
|
in_port_t rport = i + delta;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (delta)
|
if (delta)
|
||||||
fwd->rdelta[(in_port_t)i + delta] = NUM_PORTS - delta;
|
fwd->rdelta[rport] = NUM_PORTS - delta;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user