mirror of
https://passt.top/passt
synced 2024-12-22 05:35:23 +00:00
tcp: Unconditionally force ACK for all !SYN, !RST packets
Currently we set ACK on flags packets only when the acknowledged byte pointer has advanced, or we hadn't previously set a window. This means in particular that we can send a window update with no ACK flag, which doesn't appear to be correct. RFC 9293 requires a receiver to ignore such a packet [0], and indeed it appears that every non-SYN, non-RST packet should have the ACK flag. The reason for the existing logic, rather than always forcing an ACK seems to be to avoid having the packet mistaken as a duplicate ACK which might trigger a fast retransmit. However, earlier tests in the function mean we won't reach here if we don't have either an advance in the ack pointer - which will already set the ACK flag, or a window update - which shouldn't trigger a fast retransmit. [0] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc9293.html#section-3.10.7.4-2.5.2.1 Link: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/22146 Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=84 Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5894a245b9
commit
4988e2b406
6
tcp.c
6
tcp.c
@ -1593,8 +1593,6 @@ static void tcp_update_seqack_from_tap(const struct ctx *c,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32_t prev_ack_to_tap = conn->seq_ack_to_tap;
|
||||
uint32_t prev_wnd_to_tap = conn->wnd_to_tap;
|
||||
struct tcp4_l2_flags_buf_t *b4 = NULL;
|
||||
struct tcp6_l2_flags_buf_t *b6 = NULL;
|
||||
struct tcp_info tinfo = { 0 };
|
||||
@ -1675,9 +1673,7 @@ static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
|
||||
*data++ = OPT_WS_LEN;
|
||||
*data++ = conn->ws_to_tap;
|
||||
} else if (!(flags & RST)) {
|
||||
if (conn->seq_ack_to_tap != prev_ack_to_tap ||
|
||||
!prev_wnd_to_tap)
|
||||
flags |= ACK;
|
||||
flags |= ACK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
th->doff = (sizeof(*th) + optlen) / 4;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user