External/passt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://passt.top/passt synced 2024-12-22 13:45:32 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

netlink: Strip nexthop identifiers when duplicating routes

Browse Source 
If routing daemons set up host routes, for example FRR via OSPF as in
the reported issue, they might add nexthop identifiers (not objects)
that are generally not valid in the target namespace. Strip them off
as well, otherwise we'll get EINVAL from the kernel.

Link: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/22960
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
Stefano Brivio 2024-06-18 08:17:51 +02:00
parent 1544a43863
commit 62de6140d9
1 changed files with 16 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
netlink.c
View File

@ -600,13 +600,22 @@ int nl_route_dup(int s_src, unsigned int ifi_src,
if (discard)
break;
} else if (rta->rta_type == RTA_PREFSRC) {
/* Host routes might include a preferred source
* address, which must be one of the host's
* addresses. However, with -a pasta will use a
* different namespace address, making such a
* route invalid in the namespace. Strip off
* RTA_PREFSRC attributes to avoid that. */
} else if (rta->rta_type == RTA_PREFSRC ||
rta->rta_type == RTA_NH_ID) {
/* Strip RTA_PREFSRC attributes: host routes
* might include a preferred source address,
* which must be one of the host's addresses.
* However, with -a, pasta will use a different
* namespace address, making such a route
* invalid in the namespace.
*
* Strip RTA_NH_ID attributes: host routes set
* up via routing protocols (e.g. OSPF) might
* contain a nexthop ID (and not nexthop
* objects, which are taken care of in the
* RTA_MULTIPATH case above) that's not valid
* in the target namespace.
*/
rta->rta_type = RTA_UNSPEC;
}
}