After running dhclient -6 we expect the DHCPv6 assigned address to be
immediately usable. That's true with the Fedora dhclient-script (and the
upstream ISC DHCP one), however it's not true with the Debian
dhclient-script. The Debian script can complete with the address still
in "tentative" state, and the address won't be usable until Duplicate
Address Detection (DAD) completes. That's arguably a bug in Debian (see
link below), but for the time being we need to work around it anyway.
We usually get away with this, because by the time we do anything where the
address matters, DAD has completed. However, it's not robust, so we should
explicitly wait for DAD to complete when we get an DHCPv6 address.
Link: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1085231
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
When we retrieve or copy host addresses we can include deprecated
addresses, which is not what we want. Adjust our logic to exclude them.
Similarly our tests can retrieve deprecated addresses, so exclude them
there too.
I hit this in practice because my router sometimes temporarily advertises
an fd00:: prefix before the real delegated IPv6 prefix. The deprecated
address can hang around for some time messing up my tests.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
If we run passt nested (a guest connected via passt to a guest
connected via passt to the host), the first guest (L1) typically has
two IPv6 addresses on the same interface: one formed from the prefix
assigned via SLAAC, and another one assigned via DHCPv6 (to match the
address on the host).
When we select addresses for comparison, in this case, we have
multiple global unicast addresses -- again, on the same interface.
Selecting the first reported one on both host and guest is not
entirely correct (in theory, the order might differ), but works
reasonably well.
Use the trick from 5beef08597 ("test: Only select a single
interface or gateway in tests") to ask jq(1) for the first address
returned by the query.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
In practical terms, passt doesn't benefit from the additional
protection offered by the AGPL over the GPL, because it's not
suitable to be executed over a computer network.
Further, restricting the distribution under the version 3 of the GPL
wouldn't provide any practical advantage either, as long as the passt
codebase is concerned, and might cause unnecessary compatibility
dilemmas.
Change licensing terms to the GNU General Public License Version 2,
or any later version, with written permission from all current and
past contributors, namely: myself, David Gibson, Laine Stump, Andrea
Bolognani, Paul Holzinger, Richard W.M. Jones, Chris Kuhn, Florian
Weimer, Giuseppe Scrivano, Stefan Hajnoczi, and Vasiliy Ulyanov.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
For example, passt/dhcp rather than dhcp/passt. This is more
consistent with the two_guests and other test groups, and makes some
other cleanups simpler.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
