It is however only used for KVM right now because MSHV does not need it
yet.
Nonetheless a stub MSHV constructor should be there and get/set
functions should be implemented for MSHV.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuwe@microsoft.com>
Previously, we were assuming that every time an eventfd notified us,
there was only a single event waiting for us. This meant that if,
while one API request was being processed, two more arrived, the
second one would not be processed (until the next one arrived, when it
would be processed instead of that event, and so on). To fix this,
make sure we're processing the number of API and debug requests we've
been told have arrived, rather than just one. This is easy to
demonstrate by sending lots of API events and adding some sleeps to
make sure multiple events can arrive while each is being processed.
For other uses of eventfd, like the exit event, this doesn't matter —
even if we've received multiple exit events in quick succession, we
only need to exit once. So I've only made this change where receiving
an event is non-idempotent, i.e. where it matters that we process the
event the right number of times.
Technically, reset requests are also non-idempotent — there's an
observable difference between a VM resetting once, and a VM resetting
once and then immediately resetting again. But I've left that alone
for now because two resets in immediate succession doesn't sound like
something anyone would ever want to me.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Ross <hi@alyssa.is>
It is not used anywhere outside of the hypervisor crate.
Signed-off-by: Dev Rajput <t-devrajput@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuwe@microsoft.com>
Some `arch_target = "arm"' usages on VCPU related code are not correct.
And we don't support 32-bit ARM architecture.
Signed-off-by: Michael Zhao <michael.zhao@arm.com>
Function `system_registers` took mutable vector reference and modified
the vector content. Now change the definition to `get/set` style.
And rename to `get/set_sys_regs` to align with other functions.
Signed-off-by: Michael Zhao <michael.zhao@arm.com>
On AArch64, the function `core_registers` and `set_core_registers` are
the same thing of `get/set_regs` on x86_64. Now the names are aligned.
This will benefit supporting `gdb`.
Signed-off-by: Michael Zhao <michael.zhao@arm.com>
For installing packages for the custom Ubuntu image, we
need to setup DNS inside the chroot.
Signed-off-by: Archana Shinde <archana.m.shinde@intel.com>
The VM specific signal (currently only SIGWINCH) should only be handled
when the VM is running.
The generic VMM signals (SIGINT and SIGTERM) need handling at all times.
Split the signal handling into two separate threads which have differing
lifetimes.
Tested by:
1.) Boot full VM and check resize handling (SIGWINCH) works & sending
SIGTERM leads to cleanup (tested that API socket is removed.)
2.) Start without a VM and send SIGTERM/SIGINT and observe cleanup (API
socket removed)
3.) Boot full VM, delete VM and observe 2.) holds.
4.) Boot full VM, delete VM, recreate VM and observe 1.) holds.
Fixes: #4269
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
In the original code:
If the first header was invalid and the second header had the same
sequence number (zero) then the invalid first header would be returned.
The new code is more Rust idiomatic and avoids this situation.
See: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48858
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
And along with virtio-queue, we must also bump vhost-user-backend from
0.3.0 to 0.5.0 (since it relies on virtio-queue 0.4.0).
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The vhost-user backend was always provided the maximum queue size but
this is incorrect. Instead it must be informed of the actual queue size
that has been negotiated with the virtio driver running in the guest.
This ensures proper functioning of vhost-user-block with the Rust
Hypervisor Firmware, which uses a hardcoded queue size of 16.
Partially fixes#4285
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The latest vhost-user specification describes VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER
command as deprecated with the following explanation:
This is no longer used. Used to be sent to request disabling all
rings, but some back-ends interpreted it to also discard connection
state (this interpretation would lead to bugs). It is recommended that
back-ends either ignore this message, or use it to disable all rings.
Also, it's been observed that when using either Rust Hypervisor Firmware
or EDK2 OVMF firmware with SPDK (using the block device as the boot
disk), the virtio reset that happens when the firmware no longer needs
to access the block device caused a failure by triggering the command
VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER.
For all these reasons, this patch simplifies the virtio reset
implementation by simply disabling the virtqueues and no longer calling
into VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER.
Partially fixes#4285
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
Enabling the TAP interface is only about the IFF_UP flag, meaning we
shouldn't be testing the presence of IFF_RUNNING, and therefore we
shouldn't set it when not present.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The Linux kernel now checks for this before marking CPUs as
hotpluggable:
commit aa06e20f1be628186f0c2dcec09ea0009eb69778
Author: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Date: Wed Sep 8 16:41:46 2021 -0500
x86/ACPI: Don't add CPUs that are not online capable
A number of systems are showing "hotplug capable" CPUs when they
are not really hotpluggable. This is because the MADT has extra
CPU entries to support different CPUs that may be inserted into
the socket with different numbers of cores.
Starting with ACPI 6.3 the spec has an Online Capable bit in the
MADT used to determine whether or not a CPU is hotplug capable
when the enabled bit is not set.
Link: https://uefi.org/htmlspecs/ACPI_Spec_6_4_html/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model/ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html?#local-apic-flags
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <robert.bradford@intel.com>
