datatypes: Fix outdated function names in the documentation

This commit is contained in:
Matthias Bolte 2011-01-15 15:42:22 +01:00
parent b75fab32ec
commit f002e9218d

View File

@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ virUnrefInterface(virInterfacePtr iface) {
* Lookup if the storage pool is already registered for that connection,
* if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure,
* and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to
* virFreeStoragePool() is needed to not leak data.
* virUnrefStoragePool() is needed to not leak data.
*
* Returns a pointer to the network, or NULL in case of failure
*/
@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ virUnrefStoragePool(virStoragePoolPtr pool) {
* Lookup if the storage vol is already registered for that connection,
* if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure,
* and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to
* virFreeStorageVol() is needed to not leak data.
* virUnrefStorageVol() is needed to not leak data.
*
* Returns a pointer to the storage vol, or NULL in case of failure
*/
@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ virUnrefStorageVol(virStorageVolPtr vol) {
* Lookup if the device is already registered for that connection,
* if yes return a new pointer to it, if no allocate a new structure,
* and register it in the table. In any case a corresponding call to
* virFreeNodeDevice() is needed to not leak data.
* virUnrefNodeDevice() is needed to not leak data.
*
* Returns a pointer to the node device, or NULL in case of failure
*/
@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ virUnrefNodeDevice(virNodeDevicePtr dev) {
*
* Lookup if the secret is already registered for that connection, if so return
* a pointer to it, otherwise allocate a new structure, and register it in the
* table. In any case a corresponding call to virFreeSecret() is needed to not
* table. In any case a corresponding call to virUnrefSecret() is needed to not
* leak data.
*
* Returns a pointer to the secret, or NULL in case of failure