On some platforms the number of bits in the cbm_mask might not be
divisible by 4 (and not even by 2), so we need to properly count the
bits. Similar file, min_cbm_bits, is properly parsed and used, but if
the number is greater than one, we lose the information about
granularity when reporting the data in capabilities. For that matter
always report granularity, but if it is not the same as the minimum,
add that information in there as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Add info from yet another machine, this time with resctrl data so that
we can extend tests easily in a test-driven way.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
We're only adding only info about L3 caches, we can add more
later (just by changing one line), but for now that's more than enough
without overwhelming anyone.
XML snippet of how this should look like (also seen as part of the commit):
<cache>
<bank id='0' level='3' type='both' size='8192' unit='KiB' cpus='0-7'/>
</cache>
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
It is no longer needed thanks to the great virfilewrapper.c. And this
way we don't have to add a new set of functions for each prefixed
path.
While on that, add two functions that weren't there before, string and
scaled integer reading ones. Also increase the length of the string
being read by one to accompany for the optional newline at the
end (i.e. change INT_STRLEN_BOUND to INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND).
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
The mock, as well as the test, is only available on Linux. So skip
building it everywhere else, especially when it fails on mingw.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Instead of generating all of the capabilities, let's test more of our
code by probing sysfs data. This test needs quite some mocking for
now, but it paves the road for more future enhancements (hugepages
probing, for example).
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
So far, we only report an error if formatting the siblings bitmap
in NUMA topology fails.
Be consistent and always report error in virCapabilitiesFormatXML.
There are two places where you'll find info on page sizes. The first
one is under <cpu/> element, where all supported pages sizes are
listed. Then the second one is under each <cell/> element which refers
to concrete NUMA node. At this place, the size of page's pool is
reported. So the capabilities XML looks something like this:
<capabilities>
<host>
<uuid>01281cda-f352-cb11-a9db-e905fe22010c</uuid>
<cpu>
<arch>x86_64</arch>
<model>Westmere</model>
<vendor>Intel</vendor>
<topology sockets='1' cores='1' threads='1'/>
...
<pages unit='KiB' size='4'/>
<pages unit='KiB' size='2048'/>
<pages unit='KiB' size='1048576'/>
</cpu>
...
<topology>
<cells num='4'>
<cell id='0'>
<memory unit='KiB'>4054408</memory>
<pages unit='KiB' size='4'>1013602</pages>
<pages unit='KiB' size='2048'>3</pages>
<pages unit='KiB' size='1048576'>1</pages>
<distances/>
<cpus num='1'>
<cpu id='0' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='0'/>
</cpus>
</cell>
<cell id='1'>
<memory unit='KiB'>4071072</memory>
<pages unit='KiB' size='4'>1017768</pages>
<pages unit='KiB' size='2048'>3</pages>
<pages unit='KiB' size='1048576'>1</pages>
<distances/>
<cpus num='1'>
<cpu id='1' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='1'/>
</cpus>
</cell>
...
</cells>
</topology>
...
</host>
<guest/>
</capabilities>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
For now only one test is introduced. It's purpose in life
is to check we don't break NUMA host distances XML format.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
