The G_GNUC_NO_INLINE macro will eventually be marked as
deprecated [1] and we are recommended to use G_NO_INLINE instead.
Do the switch now, rather than waiting for compile time warning
to occur.
1: 15cd0f0461
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Internally we already collect x86 host family + model + stepping
numeric values. This exposed them in capabilities CPU output.
Example:
$ sudo virsh capabilities | grep -A1 -B1 signature
<microcode version='240'/>
<signature family='6' model='94' stepping='3'/>
<counter name='tsc' frequency='3408010000' scaling='no'/>
Users need to know these values to calculate an expected.
SEV-ES/SEV-SNP launch measurement.
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
While we don't want to aim for the shortest list of disabled features in
the baseline result (it would select a very old model), we want to do so
while looking at any of the input models for which we're trying to
compute a baseline CPU model. Given a set of input models, we always
want to take the least capable one of them (i.e., the one with shortest
list of disabled features) or a better model which is not one of the
input models.
So when considering an input model, we just check whether its list of
disabled features is shorter than the currently best one. When looking
at other models we check both enabled and disabled features while
penalizing disabled features as implemented by the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
For finding the best matching CPU model for a given set of features
while we don't know the CPU signature (i.e., when computing a baseline
CPU model) we've been using a "shortest list of features" heuristics.
This works well if new CPU models are supersets of older models, but
that's not always the case. As a result it may actually select a new CPU
model as a baseline while removing some features from it to make it
compatible with older models. This is in general worse than using an old
CPU model with a bunch of added features as a guest OS or apps may crash
when using features that were disabled.
On the other hand we don't want to end up with a very old model which
would guarantee no disabled features as it could stop a guest OS or apps
from using some features provided by the CPU because they would not
expect them on such an old CPU.
This patch changes the heuristics to something in between. Enabled and
disabled features are counted separately so that a CPU model requiring
some features to be disabled looks worse than a model with fewer
disabled features even if its complete list of features is longer. The
penalty given for each additional disabled feature gets bigger to make
longer list of disabled features look even worse.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851227
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
It will become more complicated and so it deserves to be separated into
a new function.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Checking the signature in two different places makes no sense since the
code in between can only mark the candidate as the best option so far,
which is what the second signature match does as well.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
These two pointers can never be NULL since they are initialised to a reference
of a struct. This became apparent when commit 210a19539447 added a VIR_DEBUG
which used both pointers because due to the concise condition the compiler saw
that if the "and" part of the condition did short-circuit (and it assumed that
can happen) the second variable would not be initialised, but it is used in the
debugging message, so the build failed with:
In file included from ../src/cpu/cpu_x86.c:27:
../src/cpu/cpu_x86.c: In function ‘virCPUx86DataIsIdentical’:
../src/util/virlog.h:79:5: error: ‘bdata’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
Fix this by just assigning the helper pointers and remove the condition
altogether.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
The function returns 'virCPUData' but doesn't do two important steps
which other code takes:
1) leaves with all-zero data is stripped from the XML output
2) the data is expected to be sorted in the array
Now the 'virHostCPUGetCPUID' helper returns both all 0 leaves and
doesn't order them as we expect.
If this is then used in conjunction with 'virCPUx86DataIsIdentical'
together with data which made a roundtrip to XML and back the result
will be always false even if the data itself is identical.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Without this it's impossible to debug scenarios when this function
returns a mismatch but the formatted data looks identical.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
There are couple of places where virTristateBoolTypeFromString()
is called. Well, the same result can be achieved by
virXMLPropTristateBool() and on fewer lines.
Note there are couple of places left untouched because those
don't care about error reporting and thus are shorter they way
they are now.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
There are couple of places (all of them in XML parsing) where
virTristateSwitchTypeFromString() is called. Well, the same
result can be achieved by virXMLPropTristateSwitch() and on fewer
lines.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
This will be needed directly in the QEMU driver in a later patch.
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
ppc64Compute() is used only once, by virCPUppc64Compare(), which
doesn't use the 'guest' parameter. It was last used by an API
called 'cpuGuestData' that was dropped by commit 03fa904c0c0cb2.
Removing the 'guest' parameter will not only remove unused code from
ppc64Compute() but also remove the ppc64MakeCPUData() entirely.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
x86Compute() is a static function called only by virCPUx86Compare()
which passes NULL to the 'guest' parameter of x86Compute().
The last caller of x86Compute() that used it with 'guest' != NULL
was an API called 'cpuGuestData'. This API was dropped by commit
03fa904c0c0cb2 a few years ago. Since then all callers of x86Compute()
uses it with 'guest' = NULL.
Removing the 'guest' parameter allow us to remove a good chunk of
logic that isn't being used for awhile.
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This makes it possible to call virCPUDataParse with a xmlNodePtr,
which will be required by a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
The function does not need a full xmlXPathContextPtr any longer and a
later patch will require a call to this function with only a xmlNodePtr
available.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Factor out duplicated code from x86FeatureParse and virCPUx86DataParse.
This also consolidates error messages.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
... by using virXMLProp*() helpers. These only require a xmlNodePtr and
do not need a xmlXPathContextPtr. Reflect that in the function signature.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
... by using virXMLProp*() helpers. These only require a xmlNodePtr and
do not need a xmlXPathContextPtr. Reflect that in the function signature.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Use virAppendElement instead of virInsertElementsN to implement
VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT which allows us to remove error handling as the
only relevant errors were removed when switching to aborting memory
allocation functions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Use virAppendElement instead of virInsertElementsN to implement
VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT_COPY which allows us to remove error handling as the
only relevant errors were removed when switching to aborting memory
allocation functions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
In a few places we take 1 and shift it left repeatedly. So much
that it won't longer fit into signed integer. The problem is that
this is undefined behaviour. Switching to 1U makes us stay within
boundaries.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
They were added mostly randomly and we don't really want to keep working
around of false positives.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Historically, we declared pointer type to our types:
typedef struct _virXXX virXXX;
typedef virXXX *virXXXPtr;
But usefulness of such declaration is questionable, at best.
Unfortunately, we can't drop every such declaration - we have to
carry some over, because they are part of public API (e.g.
virDomainPtr). But for internal types - we can do drop them and
use what every other C project uses 'virXXX *'.
This change was generated by a very ugly shell script that
generated sed script which was then called over each file in the
repository. For the shell script refer to the cover letter:
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-March/msg00537.html
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
The glib implementation doesn't tolerate NULL but in most cases we check
before anyways. The rest of the callers adds a NULL check.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Pre-allocate the list to the upper bound and fill it gradually. Since
the data is kept long-term and the list won't be populated much shrink
it to the actual size after parsing.
While using 'virStringListAdd' here wouldn't be as expensive as this
function is used just once, the removal will allow to remove
'virStringListAdd' altogether to discourage the antipattern it promotes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
The logic applied in the ppc64 case isn't quite correct, as the
interpretation of maximum mode depends on whether hardware virt
is used or not. This is information the CPU driver doesn't have.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
For hardware virtualization this is functionally identical to the
existing host-passthrough mode so the same caveats apply.
For emulated guest this exposes the maximum featureset supported by
the emulator. Note that despite being emulated this is not guaranteed
to be migration safe, especially if different emulator software versions
are used on each host.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
On platforms that lack both getauxval() and elf_aux_info(),
such as OpenBSD and macOS, host CPU detection can't work.
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/121
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
No need to fetch the same information twice.
As a side effect, this solves a bug where, on platforms where
elf_aux_info() is used instead of getauxval(), we would not
make sure the CPUID feature is available before attempting to
use it.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This header is not present on several non-Linux targets that
nonetheless support aarch64.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Glib provides g_auto(GStrv) which is in-place replacement of our
VIR_AUTOSTRINGLIST.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
For backward compatibility with older versions of libvirt CPU models in
our CPU map are mostly immutable. We only changed them in a few specific
cases after showing it was safe. Sometimes QEMU developers realize a
specific feature should not be part of a particular (or any) CPU model
because it can never be enabled automatically without further
configuration. But we couldn't follow them because doing so would break
migration to older libvirt.
If QEMU drops feature F from CPU model M because F could not be enabled
automatically anyway, asking for M would never enable F. Even with older
QEMU versions. Naively removing F from libvirt's definition of M would
seem to work nicely on a single host. Libvirt would consider M to be
compatible with hosts CPU that do not support F. However, trying to
migrate domains using M without explicitly enabling or disabling F could
fail, because older libvirt would think F was enabled (it is part of M
there), but QEMU reports it as disabled once started.
Thus we can remove such feature from a libvirt's CPU model, but we have
to make sure any CPU definition using the affected model will always
explicitly mention the state of the removed feature.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798004
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
The patch adds a new attribute for the 'feature' element in CPU model
specification to indicate that a given feature was removed from a CPU
model. In other words, older versions of libvirt would consider such
feature to be included in the CPU model.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
This is just a preparation for adding new functionality to
virCPUx86Update.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
