It's almost like we've anticipated this. Our XML parser and
formatter handles @address and @dev attributes of <portForward/>
element completely independent of each other. And as of commit
2023_03_29.b10b983~3 passt allows handling these two separately
too. All that's left is generate the cmd line according to this
new fact.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210287
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
We allow (some) domain devices to have a different <seclabel/>
than the top level domain one (this is mostly to allow access to
a resource for multiple domains). Now, we do couple of sanity
checks for such <seclabel/>, e.g. when the <label/> is specified,
but '@relabel' is set to no. But what we are missing is the
opposite: when '@relabel' is set, but no <label/> was provided.
Our schema already denies such combination. Make our parser
behave the same.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160356
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
In virNodeDeviceGetSCSIHostCaps, there is a pattern of reusing
a tmp value and stealing the pointer.
But in two case it is not stolen. Use separate variables for them
to avoid mixing autofree with manual free() calls.
Fixes: 8a0cb5f73a
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
In v9.3.0-98-g150ae3e62b two new macros were introduced:
VIR_MIGRATE_PARAM_COMPRESSION_ZLIB_LEVEL and
VIR_MIGRATE_PARAM_COMPRESSION_ZSTD_LEVEL. But both list 9.1.0 as
the version they were introduced in (this is because the patch
was sent in that release time frame). Change the version to the
current release.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
This is fairly trivial. Just set .memaddr attribute if a value
was set in the XML.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180679
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
After a QEMU domain is started, among other thing we query memory
device information. And while memory address is returned by QEMU
for all models, we store it only for DIMMs and NVDIMMs. Do store
it for VIRTIO_MEM and VIRTIO_PMEM too.
This effectively reports the address the virtio-mem/virtio-pmem
is mapped to in live XML.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Both virtio-mem and virtio-pmem devices have '.memaddr' attribute
which controls the address where they are mapped in the guest
memory. Ideally, users do not need to specify this as QEMU does
the right thing and computes addresses automatically on startup.
But soon, we will need to record this address as it is part of
guest ABI. And also, there might be some users that want to
control this value. Now, we are in a bit of a pickle, because
both these device types already have a PCI address, therefore we
can't just use <address/> blindly. But what we can do, is
introduce <address/> under the <target/> element. This is also
more conceptual, as knobs under <target/> control guest visible
config of memory device (and .memaddr surely falls into that
category).
NB, SgxEPCDeviceInfo struct in QMP definition also has .memaddr
attribute, but because of the way we build cmd line there's no
(easy) way to set the attribute. So ignore that for now.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Due to missed break; statement the virDomainInputDefPostParse()
is called not only for VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_INPUT but also
VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_LEASE and VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET, which can lead
to all sort of unpredictable results.
Fixes: c4bc4d3b82
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.
Translation: libvirt/libvirt
Translate-URL: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/libvirt/libvirt/
Co-authored-by: Weblate <noreply@weblate.org>
Signed-off-by: Fedora Weblate Translation <i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org>
This brings the tool's list of features in sync with qemu
commit 886c0453cbf10eebd42a9ccf89c3e46eb389c357.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
I was approached by a KubeVirt developer to clarify what value
does VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_STAT_DISK_CACHES report, whether it's from
the guest or the host POV. And since I didn't know the answer
even after reading the docs I think we can do better. Clarify the
POV then.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
There are/can be overall docs for enums (e.g.
virDomainModificationImpact) not just individual values. But
these never make it into the generated HTML which is a bit
unfortunate as they can contain valuable information for users.
Generate a block with overall enum documentation, just like we do
for functions.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
We have plenty of generic typedefs (that basically just alias a
struct, or our popular virXXXPtr). Because we do not generate
HTML docs for it, the documentation is placed at random places,
e.g.: comment from virDomainPtr typedef ("a virDomainPtr is
pointer to a virDomain private structure ...") ends up after
virDomainProcessSignal enum block.
There are some less weird occurrences of this problem (e.g.
virBlkioParameterPtr), but yet - the typedef appears in TOC.
Therefore, generate a block for each typedef and put its
description there.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Introduced in QEMU by commit v8.0.0-7eb061b06e.
Signed-off-by: Lin Yang <lin.a.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Instead of updating defined mdevs only add another update for active
devices as well to cover transient mdev devices as well.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143158
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@redhat.com>
Again, this fixes the same problem as one of previous commits,
but this time for memory hotplug. Long story short, if there's a
domain running and the emulator thread is restricted to a subset
of host NUMA nodes, but the memory that's about to be hotplugged
requires memory from a host NUMA node that's not in the set we
need to allow emulator thread to access the node, temporarily.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Consider a domain with two guest NUMA nodes and the following
<numatune/> setting :
<numatune>
<memory mode="strict" nodeset="0"/>
<memnode cellid="0" mode="strict" nodeset="1"/>
</numatune>
What this means is the emulator thread is pinned onto host NUMA
node #0 (by setting corresponding cpuset.mems to "0"), and two
memory-backend-* objects are created:
-object '{"qom-type":"memory-backend-ram","id":"ram-node0", .., "host-nodes":[1],"policy":"bind"}' \
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=ram-node0 \
-object '{"qom-type":"memory-backend-ram","id":"ram-node1", .., "host-nodes":[0],"policy":"bind"}' \
-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=ram-node1 \
Note, the emulator thread is pinned well before QEMU is even
exec()-ed.
Now, the way memory allocation works in QEMU is: the emulator
thread calls mmap() followed by mbind() (which is sane, that's
how everybody should do it). BUT, because the thread is already
restricted by CGroups to just NUMA node #0, calling:
mbind(host-nodes:[1]); /* made up syntax (TM) */
fails. This is expected though. Kernel was instructed to place
the memory at NUMA node "0" and yet, process is trying to place
it elsewhere.
We used to solve this by not restricting emulator thread at all
initially, and only after it's done initializing (i.e. we got the
QMP greeting) we placed it onto desired nodes. But this had its
own problems (e.g. QEMU might have locked pieces of its memory
which were then unable to migrate onto different NUMA nodes).
Therefore, in v5.1.0-rc1~282 we've changed this and set cgroups
upfront (even before exec()-ing QEMU). And this used to work, but
something has changed (I can't really put my finger on it).
Therefore, for the initialization start the thread with union of
all configured host NUMA nodes ("0-1" in our example) and fix the
placement only after QEMU is started.
NB, the memory hotplug suffers the same problem, but that will
be fixed in the next commit.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138150
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Inside of qemuProcessSetupPid() there's @numatune variable which
is set to vm->def->numa, but it lives only in one block. In the
rest of places the expanded form (vm->def->numa) is used instead.
Move the variable declaration at the beginning of the function
and use it instead of the expanded form.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
We cannot use host-nodes attribute for it, but there is no reason for us
to skip the preallocation optimisation using thread-context in such
case. Thankfully returning the proper nodemask from
qemuBuildMemoryBackendProps is enough to trigger this.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Commit 10b5e789c5 attempts to filter out the logical processor id
in the generated data to remove noise and irrelevant changes in the
output.
cpuid-leaf 0x0B may have more than two sub-leaves though. Filter out
logical processor id from all sub-leaves of 0x0B and 0x1F (superset
of the information in 0x0B).
Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The QEMU interface is still in a state of flux, and KVM support
has been pulled shortly after having been merged. Let's not
commit to a stable interface in libvirt just yet.
Reverts: 720e8f13ff
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The QEMU interface is still in a state of flux, and KVM support
has been pulled shortly after having been merged. Let's not
commit to a stable interface in libvirt just yet.
Reverts: 1347a19f75
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The QEMU interface is still in a state of flux, and KVM support
has been pulled shortly after having been merged. Let's not
commit to a stable interface in libvirt just yet.
Reverts: c6c9b5d251
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The QEMU interface is still in a state of flux, and KVM support
has been pulled shortly after having been merged. Let's not
commit to a stable interface in libvirt just yet.
Reverts: b10bc8f7ab
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
It's not used as part of the build process or searched for at
build time, and the QEMU driver detects its path at runtime,
so one could think that the BuildRequires is unnecessary. But
we actually need it to be present at build time in order to
run the full test suite.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
We already do check that if there's <memory mode='restrictive'/>
then all <memnode/> have to be of 'restrictive' mode too. But
what we are missing the reverse: if there is <memnode/> with
'restrictive' mode, then the <memory/> has to be of the same mode
too.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208946
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
